Skip to main content
Download PDF

Morphology of the male reproductive system and sperm ultrastructure of the green lacewing, Chrysopa pallens (Rambur, 1838) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)

BMC Zoology volume 8, Article number: 15 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chrysopa pallens is one of the most beneficial and effective natural predators, and is famous for its extensive distribution, wide prey spectrum, and excellent reproductive performance. This study examined the anatomy and fine structure of the C. pallens reproductive system and spermatogenesis.

Results

The male reproductive system of C. pallens comprises a pair of testes, a vas deferens, seminal vesicles, accessory glands, and short ejaculatory ducts. The testes were already mature on the day of emergence, but the accessory glands did not mature until 5 days post-emergence. In early spermatids, the flagellum had an axoneme on one side of the two mitochondrial derivatives. The nucleus was surrounded by parallel crystalline and paracrystalline materials. The spermatid envelope extends towards the paracrystalline material in a tail-shaped wing. In mature spermatids, the axoneme is located between the two accessory bodies and mitochondrial derivative sets. The parallel-crystalline and paracrystalline materials disappeared. In the testes, the wall of seminal cysts consists of a layer of epithelium, a muscular-connective sheath, and several vesicles of different sizes. The mature seminal cysts contained 128 spermatozoa. The accessory gland is composed of six parts: ventral papilla-like protuberance, anterior glandular lobe, lateral glandular lobe, seminal cyst, posterior kidney-shaped lobe, and posterior papilla-like protuberance. Muscle fibers and secretory granules are extensive.

Conclusions

This study provides information on the reproductive system of C. pallens and offers a resource for taxonomy and reproductive biology.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Insects are considered extremely successful animals, at least partly because of their efficient reproductive capacity [1]. The reproductive system of insects comprises a collection of genitalia and internal reproductive organs that play several roles in producing progeny. The genitalia reside in the appendage of the abdominal genital segments during copulation, insemination, and oviposition, and are known as copulatory organs for males or ovipositors for females [2]. In contrast to the genitalia, the internal reproductive organs are derived from the ectoderm or mesoderm and consist of several parts with sexual differences. In insects, male internal reproductive organs usually include a pair of testes, a pair of vas deferens, a pair of accessory glands, a pair of seminal vesicles, and an ejaculatory duct [3, 4]. However, the reproductive systems of insects vary in appearance, position, and number among different groups. Furthermore, the morphology of organs, tissues, and organelles in the reproductive system may vary among different orders and even among different species [3, 5,6,7,8,9,10,11].

Morphological and ultrastructural features of the genital system also offer convincing evidence for studies in systematics, reproductive biology, and evolutionary biology [2]. Over the past several decades, studies on insect reproductive systems have mainly focused on Diptera, Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, and rare insect orders such as Mecoptera and Zoraptera [2, 4, 6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Neuropterans include several important predatory species with a promising application potential in the biocontrol of insect pests. However, the phylogenetic analysis of this order is challenging because of the large number of families in Raphidioptera and Megaloptera. To date, the relationships among Hemerobiiformia, a suborder within the Neuropteran taxon, remain debated [15, 16]. Comparative analysis of the sperm structure of different insect orders has demonstrated that sperms have a series of features that are useful for elucidating the relationship between insect taxa. In the spermatozoa of Neuroptera species such as Eumantispa harmandi and Chrysopa formosa, the nucleus is encircled by a nuclear envelope that, in its anterior domain, fans out laterally into one wing. C. formosa has two large mitochondrial derivatives that encircle a conventional axoneme in a 9 + 9 + 2 microtubular pattern. The anterior sperm region is surrounded by dense external material [16, 17]. Lacewings are well-known for their symbiotic relationships with microbes, including bacteria and filamentous fungi. In the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea, all stages of microsporidium develop in direct contact with the host cell cytoplasm. Microsporidian spores were observed in cells of the proventriculus, diverticulum and in epithelial cells of the posterior midgut [18, 19].

The green lacewing, Chrysopa pallens, is one of the most beneficial and effective natural predators, famous for its extensive distribution, wide prey spectrum, and excellent reproductive performance [20, 21]. In the present study, we examined the development and morphology of the male C. pallens reproductive system using light transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Materials and methods

Insects

C. pallens was fed pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) and maintained at 25 ℃ and 70% relative humidity (RH) under a 16:8 (L:D) h photoperiod. The male and female adults were kept together after emergence to ensure complete mating.

Dissection and light microscopy

Male adults at different developmental stages were anesthetized with diethyl ether and dissected in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4). Optical microscopy of the testes, vas deferens, and accessory glands was performed on fresh samples at 20-fold magnification (VHX-2000; KEYENCE, Germany).

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Five days post-emergence, males were dissected in 0.1 M PBS. The testes and accessory glands were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde plus 3% sucrose in PBS buffer at 4 ℃ for 12 h. The samples were washed three times for 15 min each with PBS and fixed in 1% osmic acid for 2 h. The samples were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 95%) for 15 min each, then in 100% ethanol for 30 min, and finally 100% acetone for 30 min. The samples were infiltrated with a mixture of acetone and Spurr resin (1:1 v/v) for 1 h, followed by a 1:3 mixture for 3 h, and finally with Spurr resin for 5 h. The samples were embedded in fresh Spurr resin at 70 ℃ for 5 h. A Reichert-Jung Ultracut E ultramicrotome (Reichert, Vienna, Austria) was used to prepare ultrathin sections of 70–90 nm. After staining with 1% uranyl acetate for 15 min, ultrathin sections were examined under a Hitachi HT7700 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

Results

General morphology of male reproductive system

The male genital system of C. pallens consists of two symmetrical egg-shaped testes, a pair of vas deferens, seminal vesicles, accessory glands, and an ejaculatory duct (Fig. 1A). Each testis was kidney-shaped and approximately 1.2 mm in length and 440 μm in width. They were joined to the seminal vesicles by a long and slender vas deferens (approximately 2.5 mm) at the distal end. Seminal vesicles are located in the outermost ventral region of the abdomen. The accessory glands were milk-white in color, symmetrical and approximately 1.2 mm in diameter. Each half consists of six lobes on all sides, including the ventral papilla-like protuberance, anterior glandular lobe, lateral glandular lobe, seminal vesicle, posterior kidney-shaped lobe, and posterior papilla-like protuberance. The middle part of the accessory gland was thicker than the surrounding area. The ventral papilla-like protuberance, lateral glandular lobe, and posterior papilla-like protuberances are semi-transparent; however, the anterior gland lobe, seminal vesicle, and posterior kidney-shaped lobe are condensed. The seminal vesicle is ventral to and fused to the accessory gland. The ejaculatory duct was short and was embedded in the space between the two posterior ends of the accessory glands (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The male reproductive system of C. pallens and the structure of its accessory glands. A The male reproductive system of C. pallens (15-day-old). B Ventral view of the accessory glands (6-day-old). Bars = 500 μm

Full size image

The testes were fully developed 1 d post-emergence (DAE) and showed a similar size (approximately 1 mm long, 0.4 mm wide) and morphology to that of older male adults (Fig. 2A-E). However, the accessory glands exhibited marked differences in size and appearance between newly emerged and old males. The accessory glands at 1 DAE were in the initial developmental stage and smaller than those at 4 DAE. The 5-day-old accessory glands were fully mature (Fig. 2F-J).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Developmental process of C. pallens male reproductive system. The C. pallens male reproductive system at different developmental stages was shown. The testes in adults 0 days post-emergence (DAE) have a similar size and shape to that in older adults (A-E). The accessory glands in 0-day-old male adults were small in size and then grew gradually with the increase of age and became fully mature 5 DAE (F-J).

Full size image

Spermatogenesis

Early seminal cysts are filled with spermatids separated by a cytomembrane. Each cell envelope contained an axoneme consisting of a bundle of microtubules and two circular mitochondrial derivatives, which were about 0.5 μm in diameter and had good symmetry (Fig. 3A). The two mitochondrial derivatives are irregularly shaped and pressed close to each other to form narrow boundaries. The two far ends progressively condensed and initiated crystallization (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Cross-section through early spermatids of C. pallens. A Cross-section through early spermatids. Note two round mitochondrial derivatives (m) and the axoneme consisting of a bundle of microtubule (arrowhead). Arrows indicate plasma membrane. B Cross-section through early spermatids with partially condensed mitochondrial derivatives. Each shows microtubule triplets (arrowhead) and two mitochondrial derivatives (m) with a partial crystallization of the inner material (asterisk). Arrow indicates plasma membrane

Full size image

After meiosis, a seminal cyst containing approximately 128 spermatids tightly surrounded by a plasma membrane was observed (Fig. 4A). Crystallization at both ends of the expanded mitochondrial derivative. A gap appeared between the two mitochondrial derivatives, leaving room for the future insertion of the axoneme. The microtubules were arranged more regularly and the axoneme, located on one side of the two mitochondrial derivatives (approximately 1.1 μm in length), was well defined. Cross-sectioned sperm flagella exhibited pronounced bilateral symmetry (Fig. 4B). In mature spermatids, the cytoplasm was eliminated. The axoneme is surrounded by a layer of centriole adjunct material and forms two elongated accessory bodies. The axoneme was located along the middle region of the flagellum, in the space between two symmetrical accessory body/mitochondrial derivative sets (Fig. 4C). In the flagellum of mature spermatids, the axoneme exhibited a typical 9 + 9 + 2 pattern, including nine doublet microtubules (dm), nine accessory microtubules (am) and two central microtubules (cm). Two bridges linked the second and fifth axonemal doublets to the inner wall of mitochondrial derivatives (Fig. 4D).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Cross-section through tails of C. pallens spermatids. A Cross-section through a cyst showing about 128 flagellums of maturing spermatids. B Magnification of spermatids flagellums before maturation. C Cross-section through flagellums of matured spermatids. D Details of a matured spermatid. The axoneme showed a 9 + 9 + 2 pattern. m, mitochondrial derivative; ab, accessory body; ax, axoneme; dm, doublet microtubule; am, accessory microtubules; cm, central microtubule; ca., centriole adjunct. Asterisk indicates initial paracrystalline material. Arrows indicate plasma membrane. Note the bridges (arrowheads) anchoring the axonemal 2 and 5 to the mitochondrial derivatives

Full size image

In the heads of early spermatids, the nucleus had a cylindrical shape (0.4–0.5 μm in diameter) and tapered towards the anterior end. During this period, spermatid bundles were immersed in the cytoplasm of the cyst cells. The anterior spematid region is encircled by parallel crystalline waves and paracrystalline materials. In cross-section, the nucleus envelope extended towards the paracrystalline region in a tail-shaped wing (approximately 0.25 μm long), appearing tadpole-like morphology (Fig. 5A). Posteriorly, the parallel crystalline waves disappeared, but the paracrystalline materials remained adjacent to the nuclear wings (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, these two structures disappeared, whereas the tail-shaped wings were maintained (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Cross-section through spermatid nuclei of C. pallens. A Cross-section of spermatids surrounded by parallel waves (w) and paracrystalline materials (p). B Cross-section of a spermatid accompanied by triangular paracrystalline materials. C Cross-section of spermatid after individualization. N, nuclei. Arrowhead indicates tail-shaped wing

Full size image

The elongated spermatids were approximately 8 μm long, consisted of an elliptical head, a long flagellum, and a transition region between them (Fig. 6A). The axoneme and two mitochondrial derivatives in the flagellum were easily distinguishable in longitudinal sections (Fig. 6B). At regular intervals, many peripheral cristae were observed perpendicular to the axis of the mitochondrial derivatives (Fig. 6C).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Longitudinal section of the spermatids of C. pallens. A Longitudinal sections of a spermatid showing an elliptical nucleus and a long flagellum. B Magnification of a spermatid flagellum. C Mitochondrial derivatives with the arranged cristae (arrow). N, nucleus; m, mitochondrial derivative; ax, axoneme

Full size image

Ultrastructure of testis and microsporidian spores

In the cross-section of C. pallens testis, the seminal cysts were covered with a layer of extracellular fibers. There were many microsporidian spores in the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells (Fig. 7A). The wall of the seminal cysts consists of a layer of epithelium, a muscular-connective sheath, a basal lamina, and vesicles of different sizes. The lumens of the seminal cysts were filled with spermatozoa (Fig. 7B). Microsporidium is widely distributed throughout the testicular epithelium. The mature spores were rounded or oval (1.4–3 μm in diameter or length), with a lamellar polaroplast and an anchoring disk with relatively long arms. The isofilar polar tube was arranged into seven or eight coils in one row (Fig. 7C).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Ultra structure of C. pallens testis. A A seminal cyst covered with a layer of extracellular fibers (ef). B A cyst containing spermatids (s). C Mature spore with a well-developed wall consisting of an exospore (EX) and endospore (EN). V, vesicle. SP, spore. ep, epithelium. ms, muscular-connective sheath. AD, anchoring disk. PF, polar filament. PP, lamellar polaroplast. N, nucleus. Arrowhead indicates basal lamina

Full size image

Across sections of the accessory glands showed many longitudinal and circular muscle fibers (Fig. 8A, B). A large number of secretory granules are visible in the secretory epithelium. They were scattered or closely arranged, round or irregularly shaped, and varied in size from 0.2 to 8 μm (Fig. 8C, D). Numerous tiny vesicles were dispersed in the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells, forming a network (Fig. 8E). In some sections, moderately electron-dense secretory materials were closely aligned with strips of heavy electron-dense secretory materials (Fig. 8F).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Ultrastructure of C. pallens accessory glands. A Cross-section of accessory glands, showing circular muscle fibers (CM). B Details of longitudinal muscle fibers (LM). C Closely arranged secretory granules (Sg) of big size. D Scattered secretory granules (Sg). E Secretory epithelium (ep) with a network structure. F Densely packed secretory materials characterized by compaction of the moderated (asterisk) and heavy electron-dense materials (star). V, vesicle; L, lumen; N, nucleus

Full size image

Discussion

The features of the insect reproductive system may offer additional taxonomic characteristics and assist in elucidating the phylogenetic relationships between various groups. In addition, they may reflect physiological, ecological, and behavioral differences, none of which have been thoroughly clarified in Chrysopidae. To date, the morphology of the male reproductive system has been described in only a few Chrysopidae species. However, its fine structure remains unclear, as most studies were performed before the 1970s, when reliable technical approaches such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were not available [22]. In the present study, we comprehensively described the anatomy and ultrastructure of the C. pallens male reproductive system and its spermatogenesis using light microscopy and TEM. We aim to lay the foundation for future systematic, phylogenetic, and reproductive physiological studies.

Previous studies have demonstrated that the general structure of insect reproductive systems is consistent across the same family. However, morphological details may vary among species, particularly in attributes such as the size, number, shape, and structure of reproductive organs and organelles [23, 24]. This phenomenon was also observed in this study. The male reproductive system of C. pallens is morphologically similar to that of Chrysopa oculata, another species of Chrysopidae, with a pair of testes, slim vas deferens, seminal vesicles, accessory glands, and a short ejaculatory duct [22]. Furthermore, the sperm ultrastructure of C. pallens resembles that of C. formosa and Dichochrysa prasina [16]. However, obvious differences in the macrostructure of the accessory glands and the ultrastructure of spermatids also exist between C. pallens and other Chrysopidae species. For example, in the accessory glands of C. pallens, the anterior glandular lobe was triangular, and the seminal vesicle is irregular. Nevertheless, these two components in C. oculata are virgulate and elliptical, respectively [22].

The sperm ultrastructure of C. pallens resembles that of D. prasina and C. formosa, with the following similarities:1. a single axoneme; 2. pairs of bilateral accessory bodies, 3. a pair of bilateral mitochondrial derivatives, 4. a circular nucleus accompanied by a triangular paracrystalline layer, and a 5. nucleus envelope expansion in thin wings. However, the sperm of C. pallens also have unique features. First, in mature spermatids of C. pallens, both mitochondrial derivatives and their extensions towards each other are condensed. However, in mature spermatids of D. prasina and C. formosa, the two mitochondrial derivatives are condensed and their extensional areas are not[16]. Second, in C. pallens, the spermatid nucleus was surrounded by linear material that appeared as parallel waves (Fig. 5A), whereas in D. prasina and C. formosa, the corresponding material consisted of discontinuous granules separated from each other [16]. Finally, in C. pallens spermatids, both the parallel waves and paracrystalline materials progressively diminish and are eventually eliminated from the sperm. Nevertheless, at sperm maturity in D. prasina and C. formosa, the granule material disappears and the crystallized material still adheres to the nuclear wings [16]. Structures surrounding the sperm nucleus in neuropterans have also been described in other species. For example, during the elongation of spermatids in Kolla paulula, the nucleus is encircled by microtubules that shape the nucleus in hemipteran species [13]. In the species studied here, the parallel waves surrounding the nucleus may play similar roles.

In Drosophila melanogaster, spermatogonia produced by germline stem cells undergo four mitotic and two meiotic divisions to generate cysts containing 64 spermatids [25, 26]. In the present study, we found that C. pallens spermatogonia underwent one or more mitotic divisions to produce cysts with 128 spermatids, which corresponded to 27 spermatogonial divisions.

Prior to this study, there have been no reports on the ultrastructure of the male reproductive organs of Neuroptera species. Therefore, we could only compare the testis and accessory gland ultrastructures of C. pallens with those of non-Neuroptera species. A typical feature of C. pallens testes is the extensive distribution of microsporidian spores in the testicular epithelium (Fig. 7A). Lacewings are known for their symbiotic association with yeasts, bacteria and microsporidium [18]. Microsporidian spores have also been observed in the digestive organs of C. carnea. In this study, they were identified in the testicular epithelium of C. pallens. In most insects, the male accessory gland assists in the shift of sperms from male to female by secreting seminal fluid and producing spermatophores [19]. In keeping with their functions, insect accessory glands have evolved to possess common structural features. In the present study, we found that the accessory gland ultrastructure, consisting of muscular fibers, basal lamina, epithelium, and lumen in C. pallens, was similar to that in leafhoppers (Hemiptera) [13]. In addition, the epithelial cells in both species contained several types of secretory granules of diverse sizes that were stained. A similar constitution led us to conclude that secretion in C. pallens accessory gland belongs to a common apocrine mechanism in insects, which is pooled from epithelial cells to the tubular lumen backed by the apical membrane [27,28,29]. However, insect accessory glands may vary strikingly among taxa based on their detailed structures [2, 5,6,7,8,9,10,11, 13, 14, 30, 31]. In the present study, the C. pallens accessory gland showed distinctive traits, particularly the presence of many circular and longitudinal muscle fibers (Fig. 8A, B). We speculate that this is structural compensation for the lack of a long common ejaculatory duct. This reflects the reliability of C. pallens accessory glands in spermiation.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Gillott C. Arthropoda, insecta. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyodi RG, editors. Reproductive biology of invertebrates. New York, USA: Wiley; 1998. p. 319–71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu NY, Wu GX, Ze SZ, Yang B, Zhu JY. Morphology and ultrastructure of the male reproductive system of the jewel wasp, Nasonia vitripennis (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). J Asia Pac Entomol. 2017;20:577–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapman RF. Reproductive system: male. In: Chapman RF, editor. The insects: structure and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 268–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferreira A, Abdalla FC, Kerr WE, Cruz-Landim CD. Comparative anatomy of the male reproductive internal organs of 51 species of bees. Neotrop Entomol. 2004;33:569–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Özyurt N, Candan S, Suludere Z. Ultrastructure of the male reproductive system of Eurydema ventrale Kolenati 1846 (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Microsc Res Tech. 2015;78:643–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Özyurt Koçakoğlu N, Candan S, Güllü M. The histomorphological structure of the male reproductive system of maize leaf weevil Tanymecus dilaticollis Gyllenhal, 1834 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Microsc Res Tech. 2019;82(8):1345–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Özyurt Koçakoğlu N, Candan S, Güllü M. Anatomy and histology of reproductive system of adult male mint leaf beetle Chrysolina herbacea (Duftschmid, 1825) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Microsc Res Tech. 2021;84(3):512–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Çağlar Ü, Özyurt Koçakoğlu N, Candan S. Histomorphological structure of male reproductive system in Capnodis tenebrionis (Linnaeus, 1761) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Comm J Biol. 2020;4(2):140–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Erbey M, Özyurt Koçakoğlu N, Candan S. Histomorphology of the male reproductive system and spermatogenesis of Phyllobius (Ectomogaster) fulvago Gyllenhal, 1834 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae): a light and scanning electron microscope study. Entomol Rev. 2021;101(1):23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Özyurt Koçakoğlu N. Structural and histological observations on the male reproductive system of adult red poplar leaf beetle Chrysomela populi Linnaeus, 1758 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Microsc Res Tech. 2022;85(2):429–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Özyurt Koçakoğlu N, Candan S. Notes of the internal adult male reproductive system of Pimelia subglobosa (Pallas, 1781) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Zool Anz. 2022;301:106–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaiwong T, Sukontason K, Olson JK, Kurahashi H, Chaithong U, Sukontason KL. Fine structure of the reproductive system of Chrysomya megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae): the external sexual organ. Parasitol Res. 2008;102:973–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang B, Zhang C, Dietrich C, Dai W. Anatomy and ultrastructure of male reproductive system in two leafhoppers, Cicadella viridis and Kolla paulula (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2016;109:447–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lyu QH, Hua BZ. Ultrastructure of male accessory glands in the scorpionfly Sinopanorpa tincta (Navás, 1931) (Mecoptera: Panorpidae). Arthropod Struct Dev. 2017;46:627–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aspöck U. Phylogeny of the Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola). Zool Scr. 2002;31:51–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zizzari ZV, Lupetti P, Pantaleoni RA, Letardi A, Dallai R. Sperm structure of some Neuropterans and phylogenetic considerations. Ital J Zool. 2011;78:35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zizzari ZV, Machida R, Tsutsumi K, Reynoso-Velasco D, Lupetti P, Dallai R. Ultrastructural studies on euspermatozoa and paraspermatozoa in Mantispidae (Insecta, Neuroptera). Tissue Cell. 2010;42:81–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bjørnson S, Steele T, Hu Q, Ellis B, Saito T. Ultrastructure and molecular characterization of the microsporidium, Nosema chrysoperlae sp. nov., from the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) used for biological pest control. J Invertebr Pathol. 2013;114:53–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaulenas MS. Insect accessory reproductive structure: function, structure and development. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Tauber MJ, Tauber CA, Daane KM, Hagen KS. Commercialization of predators: recent lessons from green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrosoperla). Am Entomol. 2000;46:26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Han B, Zhang T, Feng Y, Liu X, Zhang L, Chen H, Zeng F, Wang M, Liu C, Li Y, Cui J, Li Z, Mao J. Two insulin receptors coordinate oogenesis and oviposition via two pathways in the green lacewing Chrysopa pallens. J Insect Physiol. 2020;123:104049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pitnick S, Wolfner MF, Suarez SS. Ejaculate-female and sperm-female interactions. In: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S, editors. Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. London: Academic Press; 2009. p. 247–304.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Dallai R, Gottardo M, Mercati D, Machida R, Mashimo Y, Matsumura Y, Rafael JA, Beutel RG. Comparative morphology of spermatozoa and reproductive systems of Zorapteran species from different world regions (Insecta, Zoraptera). Arthropod Struct Dev. 2014;43:371–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hwang JC, Bickley WE. The reproductive system of Chrysopa oculata (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1961;54:422–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hardy RW, Tokuyasu KT, Lindsley DL, Garavito M. Germinal proliferation center in the testes of Drosophila melanogaster. J Ultrastruct Res. 1979;69:180–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fuller M. Spermatogenesis. In: Martinez-Arias A, editor. The development of Drosophila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1993. p. 71–174.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Freitas SPC, Gonçalves TCM, Serrão JE, Santos-Mallet JR. Fine structure of the male accessory glands of Triatoma rubrofasciata (De Geer, 1773) (Hemiptera, Triatominae). Microsc Res Tech. 2007;70:355–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Freitas SPC, Gonçalves TCM, Serrão JE, Costa J, Santos-Mallet JR. Male reproductive system structure and accessory gland ultrastructure of two species of Triatoma (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae). Micron. 2010;41:518–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Xie S, Hua BZ. Ultrastructure of the seminal vesicle and sperm storage in Panorpidae (Insecta: Mecoptera). Micron. 2010;41:760–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Marchini D, Del Bene G, Cappelli L, Dallai R. Ultrastructure of the male reproductive accessory glands in the medfly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) and preliminary characterization of their secretions. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2003;31:313–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sukontason KL, Chaiwong T, Chaisri U, Vogtsberger RC, Sukontason K. Ultrastructure of male accessory glands of Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). J Vector Ecol. 2009;34:294–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the assistance of Mrs. Yanli Sun and Mrs. Ying Wang in the Electron Microscope Center of the National Key Laboratory of Agro-products Processing, MARA, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, for their technical support during electronic microscopy analysis.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Nos. 2021YFD100102) and 2021YFD1400803), the Projects of Guizhou Tobacco Corporation (201936, 201937, 201941), and the Major Projects of China National Tobacco Corporation [110202001032 (LS-01)].

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiaoping Liu and Xingkai Guo contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Key Laboratory of Natural Enemy Insects, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2 West Yuanmingyuan Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, P. R. China

    Xiaoping Liu, Xingkai Guo, Yanjiao Feng, Lisheng Zhang, Mengqing Wang, Yuyan Li & Jianjun Mao

Authors
  1. Xiaoping Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xingkai Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanjiao Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lisheng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mengqing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuyan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jianjun Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jianjun Mao made a major contribution to the conception and design of the study. All authors contributed to data acquisition. Xiaoping Liu and Xingkai Guo performed the experiments. Jianjun Mao has written the first draft of the manuscript and all authors revised it critically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianjun Mao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Guo, X., Feng, Y. et al. Morphology of the male reproductive system and sperm ultrastructure of the green lacewing, Chrysopa pallens (Rambur, 1838) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). BMC Zool 8, 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-023-00175-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-023-00175-8

Keywords

BMC Zoology

ISSN: 2056-3132

Contact us