Skip to main content

Multiple-biomarker approach in the assessment of bisphenol A effect on the grooved carpet clam Ruditapes decussatus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Abstract

Background

Bisphenol A (BPA), a plastic additive monomer, is among the most highly produced chemicals worldwide, and is broadly used in many industries, such as food and beverage containers, milk bottles, and paper products. Previous studies demonstrated that BPA has potential toxicity to aquatic organisms, causing endocrine disturbance and behavioural disorders. The current work aimed to determine the toxic impacts of BPA on the edible marine clam Ruditapes decussatus considering a multi-biomarker approach (mortality, biochemical studies, DNA strand breaks using comet assay, and histopathological examinations with semi-quantitative and quantitative histopathological analyses). The clams were exposed under laboratory conditions to three concentrations of BPA (0 “control”, 1, and 5 µg/L) for a period of 21 days. After the exposure period, BPA impacts were assessed in the digestive gland as a versatile and environmentally relevant organ for ecotoxicological studies.

Results

In BPA-treated clams, mortality (10%) occurred only at the highest BPA concentration (5 µg/L). Biochemical impairments were detected in a concentration-dependent manner as a consequence of BPA exposure. There were significant increases in malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GSH) levels, while catalase (CAT) activity was significantly reduced. Our results revealed that BPA induced neurotoxicity in R. decussatus, as evidenced by the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, DNA damage was strongly induced as BPA levels increased. Additionally, our results have been affirmed by alterations in digestive gland tissues at BPA treatments, which consequently can impair the clam’s ability for food absorption; these alterations included mainly atrophic and necrotic digestive tubules, epithelial cell vacuolization, hemocyte infiltration, and intertubular fibrosis. Based on the data obtained from the semi-quantitative and quantitative histopathological analyses, the exposure of the clam’s digestive gland to BPA with concentrations of 1 and 5 µg/L for 21 days showed significant histopathological alterations compared with the control clams.

Conclusion

The multi-biomarker approach used in the current study proved to be a useful tool for assessing the impact of diphenylmethane compounds, such as BPA. Water-borne BPA causes oxidative stress, neurotoxicity, genotoxicity, and deleterious effects on the clam digestive gland; all of these could deteriorate clam performance and health, causing tissue dysfunction.

Peer Review reports

Background

The grooved carpet shell clam Ruditapes decussatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Bivalvia: Veneridae) is a commercially valuable bivalve species inhabiting the Mediterranean Sea with high economic and ecological values [1, 2]. R. decussatus, like all bivalve species, is a sessile filter-feeder, making its tissues in direct contact with many chemical pollutants in the marine environment [3,4,5]. Due to its high capacity to tolerate these chemical pollutants, it can be used in ecotoxicological studies as a sensitive indicator species for pollution assessment [6].

Among the pollutants impacting the marine environment, bisphenol A (BPA; 2,2-bis-(4-hydroxyphenyl) propane) has achieved great interest. BPA is one of the world’s most widely used industrial pollutants [7, 8]. It is extensively used as a synthetic monomer in the production of polymeric materials, primarily polycarbonates and epoxy resins, that are introduced in plastics production, children’s toys, as well as used in food and beverage containers, like plastic bottles and baby feeding bottles [9,10,11]. Additionally, BPA is a dental sealant and thermal paper component and can be utilized as a stabilizer and antioxidant in manufacturing polyvinyl chloride plastics [12].

BPA poses detrimental biological impacts on marine organisms. It is one of aquatic systems’ most dominant phenolic pollutants [9, 13]. BPA is widely found in the marine ecosystem due to the continuous discharge of municipal and industrial wastes [14]. Although this compound slowly degrades in the environment, it can be leached from plastic products through photodegradation and biodegradation, and consequently, it can easily bioaccumulate in marine organisms, causing toxicity to these organisms [15,16,17]. Chronic exposure to BPA affects aquatic organisms, causing endocrine disruption, physiological alterations, behavioural and histological changes, cytotoxicity, immunotoxicity, neurotoxicity, genotoxicity, as well as reproductive toxicity [16, 18,19,20,21,22].

Ecotoxicological studies on bivalves use some potential tools to evaluate bivalve toxicity. These tools include estimation of oxidative damage, neurotoxic enzyme activity, and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage [23,24,25,26], in addition to examination of histopathological abnormalities [27].

The oxidative stress responses induced by chemicals were used as potential biomarkers to evaluate the effect of xenobiotics on aquatic animals [23]. The resulting oxidative damage can be assessed through the estimation of lipid peroxidation levels and enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in aquatic organisms [28]. However, the activities of antioxidant enzymes, like many other biochemical systems, are also influenced by various endogenous and exogenous factors [29], such as organism developmental stage and age [30], diet [31], reproductive cycle [32], temperature [33], salinity [34, 35], pH [35], and hypoxia/hyperoxia [36].

Reduced glutathione (GSH) and catalase (CAT) have been extensively used as defense antioxidant biomarkers and are involved in tissue redox balance [20, 37]. GSH is a non-enzymatic antioxidant involved in the second phase of metabolism and acts as an oxygen radical scavenger and an inhibitor of lipid peroxidation [38, 39]. It also acts as an important coenzyme for glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) [40, 41]. CAT is an enzyme antioxidant that widely serves as a sensitive oxidative stress biomarker [42]. CAT usually works in synergy with another antioxidant enzyme, superoxide dismutase (SOD) [43]. SOD protects cells by turning superoxide anion radicals into hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which is further disintegrated into water and oxygen through CAT. Thus, these antioxidant enzymes constitute the first line of defense against free radicals in cells to detoxify ROS [43, 44]. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity is a reliable indicator for assessing the neurotoxicity of environmental pollutants on aquatic bivalves [13, 26, 28]. This enzyme performs a vital function in cholinergic neurotransmission and is involved in maintaining the integrity and permeability of cell membranes during synaptic transmission and conduction [45]. It participates in breaking down acetylcholine (ACh) into choline and acetic acid at cholinergic synapses and neuromuscular junctions [26].

The identification of structural damage to DNA molecules within the bivalve genome serves as a significant biomarker for assessing the genotoxic consequences caused by environmental pollution. Destruction of the genome of the somatic cells can lead to progressive malfunction of tissues and organs, ultimately resulting in the death of the organism [46, 47]. The comet test is a commonly employed method for evaluating the genotoxicity of different pollutants in bivalves through the detection of DNA damage [24, 25].

Histopathology is an effective tool for evaluating the biological condition of coastal ecosystems through offering insights into the overall health of bivalves by examining their tissues [48,49,50]. The digestive gland is considered a primary site of homeostasis of the internal medium and is responsible for the bioaccumulation and detoxification of xenobiotics ingested with food particles. Also, it performs a vital role in intracellular digestion, hormone synthesis, and immunological defense [51, 52]. The digestive gland is rich in oxidizable substrates, such as fatty acids, which render this organ vulnerable to oxidative damage caused by free radicals [53]. Furthermore, it is widely recognized that the antioxidant defense system of the digestive gland aids in the elimination of excessive ROS caused by environmental pollutants [54]. The digestive gland is regarded as a primary organ of interest in toxicological studies due to the vulnerability of its epithelial cells to the deleterious effects of several contaminants in the marine environment [55].

Even though previous research has expressed worries about the adverse impacts of BPA on marine bivalve species [16, 56,57,58,59], there is a lack of available studies of BPA impact on R. decussatus clam. So, the current work was designed to explore the chronic toxic impact of BPA on R. decussatus clam through its survival, redox state, and detection of DNA damage in its digestive gland tissues. Moreover, it was conducted to identify the histopathological abnormalities in digestive gland tissues induced by chronic exposure to BPA.

Materials and methods

Collection and acclimation of the clam Ruditapes decussatus

About 200 individuals of the clam R. decussatus were collected in October 2023 in El-Anfoshy Bay (31° 12’ 24” N, 29° 52’ 18” E), Alexandria, Egypt (Fig. 1A&B). The selection of the collecting site as a reference area was based on prior ecotoxicological studies conducted on marine bivalves [16, 60, 61]. The collected clams were placed in plastic boxes in well-aerated seawater obtained at the collection site and immediately transported to the laboratory at the Faculty of Education, Alexandria University. Upon arrival at the laboratory, clams were separated into three 20-litre glass aquaria (31 × 21 × 36 cm) covered with ~ 1 cm of clean sieved sand. The clams were acclimated for a period of 7 days in constantly aerated natural seawater renewed daily and kept at room temperature of 32 ± 1.5 °C, salinity of 34 ± 0.5 psu, and photoperiod of 12 h:12 h (light: dark) before the beginning of the experiment. Over the acclimation period, clams were fed with fresh microalgae Nannochloropsis oculata (20,000 cells/ml) every two days.

Experimental design

Only healthy clams, with intact well-closed shells and uniform size, were used in this assay. One hundred twenty clams measured 34.11 ± 0.22 mm shell length, 44.96 ± 0.21 mm shell width, and 22.11 ± 0.26 g weight, were randomly distributed into three groups with 40 individuals per group. In total, 15 five-litre glass aquaria were used as experimental units, with five replicates per group and eight clams per aquarium. Each aquarium (25 × 15 × 16 cm) was filled with 3 L of naturally continuously aerated seawater. The desired concentrations of BPA (CAS-RN: 80-05-7, C15H16O2, MW: 228.29 g/mol, 99% purity, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) [0 (control), 1, and 5 µg/L] were freshly prepared daily by dissolving BPA in the filtered seawater. Clams were exposed to BPA concentrations for a period of 21 days. The BPA concentrations and exposure period used in this work were chosen based on prior research on aquatic bivalves [16, 61, 62]. These concentrations are environmentally relevant concentrations based on the studies of Hatef et al. [63] and Ozhan and Kocaman [64]. In order to maintain BPA concentrations and to ensure water quality, seawater in every experimental unit was fully exchanged daily, and the concentrations of BPA were re-established. Phytoplankton (~ 1.57 × 106 cells/L [65]) in the natural seawater, not removed by filtration, were the only food source for clams, and no additional food was added to clams during the exposure period [66,67,68].

Survival status of the clam Ruditapes decussatus

Clams’ live or dead status was assessed daily during the experimental period. All clam individuals were gently checked. The presence of a gap between the two valves and no response to touch were considered as signs of death.

Biochemical analysis in the clam Ruditapes decussatus digestive gland

At the end of the 21-day experimental period, clams (n = 3 individuals/concentration), i.e., one clam was chosen randomly per aquarium (n = 3 true replicates), were dissected using a scalpel to separate the digestive gland from the soft tissues. The digestive gland samples were homogenized three times with buffer solution (20 mM Tris buffer, 0.5 M sucrose, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.6) (1:9 w/v) in ice water for 30 s, using an electric mixer at 6,000 rpm. The homogenate was centrifuged at 9,000 ×g for 30 min at 4 °C [69]. The supernatant was used for spectrophotometric evaluation of biochemical parameters utilizing a test kit obtained from Bio-Diagnostic Co. Dokki, Giza, Egypt. The protein content in samples was estimated following the Lowry et al. [70] method using bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma) as the standard. This analysis relied on reducing phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid in the folin reagent under alkaline conditions. The absorbance of the supernatant was detected using a spectrophotometer (Evolution 300, Thermo Scientific, USA), at a wavelength of 540 nm.

Determination of lipid peroxidation level

Lipid peroxidation was detected through the estimation of the malondialdehyde (MDA, CAT. NO. MD 25 29) level in the supernatant using the colorimetric method of Draper and Hadley [71]. This method relies on the MDA reaction with 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA) in an acidic medium for 30 min at 95 °C to form a TBA reactive product. The absorbance of the resulting pink-colored product can be determined at 534 nm. The MDA levels were presented as nmol/mg protein.

Determination of reduced glutathione (GSH) level

The level of reduced glutathione (GSH, CAT. No. GR 25 11) was determined using a method that relies on the reduction of 5,5′-dithio-bis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) by a sulfhydryl (-SH) group of glutathione, resulting in a yellow color. The reduced chromogen is directly proportional to the GSH level [72, 73]. The absorbance was recorded at 405 nm, and the GSH level was presented as µg/mg protein.

Determination of catalase (CAT) activity

Catalase (CAT, CAT. No. CA 25 17) activity was estimated following the colorimetric method of Aebi [74]. CAT reacted with a predetermined amount of H2O2, and the reaction was halted precisely after one minute using sodium azide (NaN3) as a CAT inhibitor [75, 76]. In the presence of horseradish peroxidase (HRP), the remaining H2O2 reacted with 3,5-Dichloro-2-hydroxybenzene sulfonic acid (DHBS) and 4-aminophenazone (AP) to form a chromophore with a color intensity inversely proportional to the amount of CAT in the original sample. The absorbance was conducted at a wavelength of 520 nm, and its activity was presented as U/mg protein, where one unit of CAT is the amount of CAT in the sample that catalyses the dismutation of 1 µmol of hydrogen peroxide per minute.

Determination of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity

The acetylcholinesterase (AChE, EC 3.1.1.7) activity was determined in the digestive gland homogenate supernatant following the Ellman et al. [77] method. AChE reacted with acetylcholine thioiodide (ACTI) as the first substrate and 5,5′-Dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) as a second substrate, giving a yellow-colored product. Absorbance was determined by spectrophotometer at 405 nm every two minutes. The AChE activity in the sample was presented as nmol of ACTI hydrolyzed/min/mg protein.

Assessment of DNA damage in the digestive gland of Ruditapes decussatus clam using comet analysis

The genotoxicity of cells obtained from the digestive glands of R. decussatus (5 individuals/concentration) after 21 days of BPA exposure was assessed by the comet assay under alkaline conditions following the Singh et al. [78] method. Using a small dissecting scissor, tissues were chopped into tiny pieces prior to being homogenized in a chilled buffer containing 0.075 M NaCl and 0.024 M Na2 EDTA. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 700 ×g for 10 min at 4 °C, re-suspended twice in a chilled buffer, and finally, cell pellets were obtained. Cells were mixed with low-melting-point agarose and then spread over a frosted slide. After that, slides were immersed for ~ 15 min in a neutralization buffer, dried, and stained with ethidium bromide. The slides were visualized by an epi-fluorescence microscope (Leitz Orthoplan, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with an excitation filter of 515–560 nm and a barrier filter of 590 nm. Randomly, ~ 100 cells per slide were selected to assess the comet cells. DNA damage was estimated as a percentage of tailed cells (%), tail length (µm), percentage of tail DNA (%), and tail moment (Arbitrary units) using a computer-based image analysis system (Comet Assay V software, Perspective Instruments).

Histological examination of the digestive gland of Ruditapes decussatus clam

The digestive gland (n = 5 individuals/concentration) was carefully removed and kept in Davidson’s solution for 48 h, followed by transfer to 70% ethanol. Afterwards, tissues were processed in ascending concentrations of ethanol (80, 85, 90, 95, and 100%), infiltrated with xylene, and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections, 5 μm thick, were cut using a rotary microtome (Leica Reichert Jung Biocut 2030, USA), mounted on glass slides, stained with Harris hematoxylin, and counterstained with acidic eosin for histopathological examination. Slides were examined using light microscopy (Olympus BX41, Japan) and photomicrographed with a digital microscope camera (Lecia MC170 HD) to identify the histopathological changes in digestive gland tissues [48, 79].

Semi-quantitative and quantitative histopathological analyses of the digestive gland of Ruditapes decussatus clams

For semi-quantitative analysis, the histopathological condition index was utilized based on the weighted indices approach stated by Joshy et al. [27], Costa et al. [48], and Cuevas et al. [49] to evaluate the health status of the R. decussatus clam’s digestive gland tissues. The histopathological condition index was estimated by the weight of each histopathological alteration (wj) (Table 1) and the degree of corresponding histopathological alteration (ajh) based on the following formula:

Table 1 The main histopathologies observed in the digestive gland of Ruditapes decussatus clams and their respective weights
$${\text{I}}_{\text{h}}=\frac{{\sum}_{1}^{j}{{\text{w}}_{\text{j}}\text{a}}_{\text{j}\text{h}}}{{\sum\:}_{1}^{j}{\text{M}}_{\text{j}}}$$

Where Ih: is the histopathological condition index for the individual h, wj: is the weight of the jth histopathological alteration, ajh: is the score attributed to the h individual for the jth alteration, Mj: is the attributable maximum value for the jth alteration (weight multiplied by the maximum score), and j: is the number of classified histopathological alterations in tissue. The weight value of the histopathological alteration ranges between 1 (minimum severity) and 3 (maximum severity) depending on its biological significance, and the score values are 0 (absent), 2 (infrequent), 4 (frequent), and 6 (diffuse). The denominator of the equation standardizes the value of the histopathological indices between 0 and 1 to allow comparisons between different groups [48]. The overall mean of the histopathological condition indices for five replicates from randomly selected areas of digestive gland sections per concentration (n = 5 replicates/concentration) was calculated and was classified as low (0.00–0.30), moderate (0.31–0.60), and high (0.61–1.0), according to Joshy et al. [27]. The precision of the histopathological analyses was verified by a series of blind reviews.

For quantitative analysis, the histomorphometry of the lumen and epithelial areas of the digestive gland tubules was analyzed through Image J software [80]. Different measurements from digestive gland tubular profiles were obtained from the average of five randomly selected digestive gland tubules of each animal’s section used per concentration (n = 5 individuals/concentration). These measurements include digestive tubule area (µm2), luminal area (µm2), and digestive tubule wall area (µm2), according to Tybinka et al. [81]. To indicate the changes in the digestive gland morphometry, both relative digestive tubule lumen area (%) and relative digestive tubule wall area (%) were calculated according to this equation:

$$\begin{aligned} & {\text{Relative digestive tubule lumen and}}/{\text{or wall area}} (\%) \\& \quad = \frac{{\text{Luminal and/or wall area}}\ (\mu {\text{m}}^2)}{{\text{Digestive tubule area}}\ (\mu {\text{m}}^2)} \times 100 \\\end{aligned}$$

Statistical analysis of data

All results were presented as means of three (for the biochemical analyses) or five (for the comet assay and the semi-quantitative and quantitative histopathological analyses) independent samples ± standard errors (SE). All analyses were conducted using the free statistical computing and graphics software R (version 4.3.1, R Core Team [82]). A Kaplan-Meier estimator of survival probability was calculated for each treatment to analyze clam survival status. A log-rank test was performed for relevant survival and treatment combinations. Probabilities were estimated at each time point when an event occurred, and the products of those probabilities were used to estimate the survival proportions. Clam mortality was defined as an ‘event’, and clams that survived to the end of the experiment were considered ‘censored’ data. Since non-parametric survival analyses cannot explicitly incorporate information from replication (such as differences in survival among replicate aquaria), and due to the small size of the experiment, clams were pooled across replicate aquaria to estimate overall survival curves for each treatment (i.e., n = 40 individuals/concentration).

Analyses were performed using the “survival” package [83], while the “survminer” package was used for plotting the survival curves [84].

Biochemical markers, DNA damage parameters, and semi-quantitative and quantitative histopathological parameters were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s honest significant difference (Tukey HSD) test. A significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05 for all analyses. Prior to the analysis, the normality of distributions was checked using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and the homogeneity of variances was explored by the Fligner-Killeen test and by a detailed visual inspection of the residuals’ plots. Package “ggplot2” was used to produce the final plots [85].

Results

Survival of Ruditapes decussatus clam

R. decussatus showed 100% survival under control laboratory conditions and after 21 days of exposure to 1 µg/L of BPA. However, 10% of the clam mortality was recorded during the experiment period in response to the 5 µg/L of BPA exposure (i.e., 4 clams died by the end of the experiment). Survival probabilities showed significant differences between treatments (log-rank test: χ2 = 8.3, df = 2, p = 0.02). With this so low mortality at 5 µg/L of BPA concentration, the medium time to death could not be calculated. No mortality occurred until the 17th day of the exposure period, when one clam died, followed by the death of two and one more individual on days 19 and 20, respectively (Fig. 2).

Biochemical marker responses of Ruditapes decussatus clam exposed to BPA

The chronic impacts of BPA on the oxidative stress (MDA) and antioxidant (GSH and CAT) biomarkers in the R. decussatus digestive gland were investigated and summarized in Table 2; Fig. 3A-C. The results showed that the chronic effect of BPA yielded highly significant differences (p < 0.001) between treatments in the three measured parameters (Table 2). The present results revealed significant increases (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01) in MDA and GSH levels, respectively, in animals subjected to 1 µg/L of BPA and highly significant increases (p < 0.001) in MDA and GSH levels in animals exposed to 5 µg/L of BPA in comparison to the control group (Fig. 3A&B). The MDA level increased in the R. decussatus digestive gland by change percentages of 135 and 197% after exposure to 1 and 5 µg/L of BPA, respectively, compared to the control group (Fig. 3A). At the same time, the GSH level was more highly induced in clams subjected to 1 and 5 µg/L of BPA, showing an increasing percentage of about 290 and 498%, respectively, compared to the control group (Fig. 3B). Additionally, highly statistical significant differences (p < 0.001) in MDA level between the two treatment groups of BPA (1 and 5 µg/L) were recorded (Fig. 3A) and a lesser degree of significant difference (p = 0.02) in GSH level between them (Fig. 3B).

Table 2 Statistical results of a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the biochemical parameters measured in Ruditapes decussatus digestive glands following exposure to bisphenol A (1 and 5 µg/L) concentrations for the experimental time of 21 days in comparing with a control group

On the contrary, the CAT activity showed significant statistical reductions (p < 0.01) in two BPA treatments (1 and 5 µg/L) compared to the control group (Fig. 3C). The CAT depletion levels revealed a concentration-dependent manner, where CAT levels decreased by about 40.25 and 62.42% in the R. decussatus digestive gland exposed to 1 and 5 µg/L of BPA, respectively, compared to the control group. The statistically significant difference (p = 0.04) in CAT level was recorded between the two treatment groups of BPA (1 and 5 µg/L) (Fig. 3C).

The neurotoxic impacts induced by the BPA in the digestive gland of R. decussatus were evaluated by determining the AChE activity (Fig. 3D). The highly significant variation (p < 0.001) in AChE activity was determined among all groups (Table 2). Highly significant inhibition (p = 0.001) in the AChE activity with 52% reduction was recorded in animals after exposure to 1 µg/L of BPA compared to the control group. However, exposure to 5 µg/L of BPA resulted in the most dramatic inhibition (p < 0.001), with an 80% reduction in the AChE activity compared to the control group. Moreover, a marginal statistical reduction (p = 0.03) in the AChE activity was recorded between the two BPA treatments (1 and 5 µg/L) (Fig. 3D).

Estimation of DNA damage in the digestive gland of Ruditapes decussatus clam by comet assay

To evaluate DNA integrity in the R. decussatus digestive gland cells after 21 days of BPA exposure, the present study conducted a comet assay. BPA instigated genotoxic consequences in R. decussatus digestive glands (Fig. 4A-C). A visual examination of microphotographs of comets clearly revealed that the DNA molecules extracted from R. decussatus digestive gland cells of the control group did not exhibit detrimental alterations. Instead, they exhibited a symmetrical bright nucleus surrounded by a thin halo (Fig. 4A). Conversely, the DNA of the clam groups subjected to concentrations of 1 and 5 µg/L exhibited a noticeable ‘comet’ formation after electrophoresis due to breakdown and migration of fragments of genomic DNA (Fig. 4B&C).

Data represented in Table 3 illustrate the highly significant differences (p < 0.001) among all groups in the four measured parameters, including the percentage of tailed cells, the length of the comet tail, the percentage of DNA in the comet tail, and the tail moment. In general, the control group showed slightly less than 5% of nuclei with DNA damage, while the mean percentages of the digestive gland cells with damaged DNA from the groups treated with 1 and 5 µg/L of BPA had about two (p = 0.005) and five times (p˂ 0.001), respectively, higher than that recorded in the control group. A highly significant variation (p˂ 0.001) was recorded between two treatment groups (1 and 5 µg/L) (Fig. 5A). Specifically, there were highly significant variations (p ≤ 0.001) in the digestive gland tissues of R. decussatus with DNA impairment, including length of comet tail, DNA percentage in comet tail, tail moment in the treated groups with 1 and 5 µg/L of BPA compared with a control group. At the same time, these parameters presented significant variations (p˂ 0.01) among the two treated groups (1 and 5 µg/L) (Fig. 5B-D).

Table 3 Statistical results of a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of DNA damage parameters in Ruditapes decussatus digestive glands following exposure to bisphenol A (1 and 5 µg/L) concentrations for the experimental time of 21 days in comparing with a control group

Histological alterations assessment of Ruditapes decussatus clam digestive gland

The histology of the digestive gland tissues of control and treated R. decussatus clams with BPA is presented in Figs. 6 and 7. Unexposed control R. decussatus clams showed the normal histological structure of the digestive gland, consisting of intact digestive tubules constituted by a single layer of epithelial cells of two main cell types: digestive and basophilic cells surrounding a narrow tubular lumen. Digestive cells are characterized by their columnar shape and small basal nuclei, while basophilic cells have a triangular shape and large nuclei. The normal intertubular connective tissue mainly consists of a low number of fibrocytes and a normal distribution of hemocytes (Figs. 6A and 7A-B). Exposure to different BPA concentrations (1 and 5 µg/L) for 21 days apparently damaged the structure of the R. decussatus digestive gland. The digestive glands subjected to 1 µg/L of BPA represented histological alterations, including a fusion in atrophic digestive gland tubules characterized mainly by a narrowing of the tubular lining with a low cuboidal appearance and dilation of the tubular lumen (Fig. 6B). Vacuolization in the digestive epithelial cells and the appearance of fibrosis and hemocyte infiltration, typically granulocytes in the damaged intertubular connective tissue, were the most commonly noticed histological alterations in the digestive glands subjected to 1 µg/L of BPA (Fig. 7C-D).

At the same time, severe lesions were recorded in digestive glands subjected to 5 µg/L of BPA. Atrophic and necrotic digestive tubules were mostly associated with a detachment of some epithelial cells within the digestive tubules’ lumen, resulting in occlusion of the lumen. Hemocyte infiltration and brown cells associated with lipofuscin-like pigments were observed in the intertubular connective tissue among the damaged digestive gland tubules, implying inflammatory responses. The vacuolation within the epithelial cells and intertubular fibrosis were also recorded. All these alterations destroy the digestive tubules of R. decussatus subjected to 5 µg/L of BPA (Figs. 6C-D and 7E-J).

Semi-quantitative and quantitative histopathological analyses of the digestive gland of Ruditapes decussatus clams

The analysis of the histopathological condition indices of the digestive gland of R. decussatus clams revealed that there was a significant variation (p < 0.001) between groups (Table 4). Exposure of clams to different BPA concentrations (1 and 5 µg/L) for 21 days showed significant differences (p < 0.001) compared with the control clams. The clams subjected to BPA with a 5 µg/L concentration attained the highest value of histopathological condition index (0.71 ± 0.01, high Ih), which was significantly different (p ≤ 0.001) from other clam groups, followed by clams subjected to BPA with a 1 µg/L concentration (0.53 ± 0.03, moderate Ih) and control clams (0.02 ± 0.005, low Ih) (Fig. 8A).

Table 4 Statistical results of a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of histopathological semi-quantitative and quantitative parameters in Ruditapes decussatus digestive glands following exposure to bisphenol A (1 and 5 µg/L) concentrations for the experimental time of 21 days in comparing with a control group

The histomorphometric data displayed in Fig. 8B indicate that there was a significant variation (p < 0.001) between groups (Table 4). The morphometric analysis of the digestive gland tubules showed that the two BPA-treated groups (1 and 5 µg/L) were atrophied in a concentration-dependent manner through significant increases (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001 for low and high concentrations, respectively) of the values of the relative digestive tubule lumen area and significant decreases (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001 for low and high concentrations, respectively) of the values of the relative digestive tubule wall area as compared with the control group.

Discussion

BPA is a highly prevalent environmental contaminant and hormonal disruptor [21]. The presence of BPA in aquatic ecosystems can cause harmful consequences for creatures at several biological levels [86, 87]. The present study was designed to assess the potential impact of chronic exposure to 1 and 5 µg/L of BPA on R. decussatus clam health. The duration of BPA exposure in this study was 21 days, which allowed enough time to manifest the impacts of harmful substances in clams [62, 88].

In the current work, the clam R. decussatus showed 100% survival in the control treatment and response to a low dose of BPA (1 µg/L) after 21-day exposure. Low mortality (10%) was only observed at 5 µg/L of BPA. Similarly, as a result of the BPA genotoxic effect, freshwater invertebrates like Daphnia magna and Chironomus riparius demonstrated a reduction in survival rate after exposure to 0.3 µg/L and 500 µg/L of BPA, respectively, for a period of 24 h [89]. Moreover, the blood clam Tegillarca granosa showed a mortality rate of ~ 24% after 2 weeks of exposure to 100 ng/L of BPA [90]. Survival impairment at a high BPA concentration in this study might be considered as a consequence of serious progress of level toxicities that are discussed below in detail.

An extensively recognized mechanism of BPA’s toxic effect in aquatic animals is its capacity to induce oxidative stress damage by producing elevated levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) interacting with biomolecules, such as cellular lipids, carbohydrates, proteins, and DNA [16, 17, 89]. This interaction results in diverse cellular and tissue impairments in aquatic bivalve species, including mitochondrial dysfunction and the formation of lipid peroxidation, resulting in a decrease in cell viability [16, 91]. Also, BPA can impair the natural defense system of these organisms, including endogenous enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants involved in the maintenance of tissue redox balance, and induce adverse effects by inhibiting antioxidant enzyme activities [19, 92, 93].

The current results showed that the chronic impact of BPA revealed significant elevations in MDA levels in the R. decussatus digestive gland subjected to 1 and 5 µg/L of BPA when compared to the control group, and these increases exhibited a concentration-dependent manner. The significant increase in MDA levels indicated that BPA induced oxidative stress and lipid oxidation damage in the R. decussatus digestive gland. Hence, the excessive production of cellular ROS can lead to the oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids in membrane lipids through radical reactions. This process causes alterations in membrane permeability and fluidity, in addition to the accumulation of oxidized lipid products like MDA, which is commonly used as a reliable biomarker to assess the extent of membrane lipid peroxidation in the presence of BPA pollution [94, 95]. This result is consistent with the previous findings in bivalves subjected to different levels of BPA concentration [16, 93, 96]. Moreover, Jenzri et al. [17] observed a significant elevation in MDA levels in the tissues of the respiratory tree and digestive tube of the sea cucumber Holothuria poli exposed to BPA.

Herein, the elevated stimulation of GSH levels in the R. decussatus digestive gland by BPA is an attempt to mitigate the harmful oxidative stress resulting from the excessive ROS produced during BPA metabolization. According to Abd Elkader and Al-Shami [16], the rise in GSH levels is probably due to an enhancement in antioxidant defenses caused by an increase in ROS production generated by BPA. This finding aligns with the findings of Jenzri et al. [17], who recorded a notably elevated GSH level in the respiratory tree and digestive tube tissues of sea cucumbers subjected to BPA compared to the control group.

Even though the level of GSH increased in the R. decussatus digestive gland exposed to 1 and 5 µg/L of BPA, the level of MDA remained high, indicating the high toxicity of BPA and the antioxidant capacity of R. decussatus clams was inadequate to eliminate the ROS produced during the metabolism of BPA efficiently and to prevent the damage caused by lipid oxidation. Therefore, the present results recorded significant reductions of CAT activity in the R. decussatus digestive gland exposed to 1 and 5 µg/L of BPA when compared to the control group in a concentration-dependent manner. This reduction emphasizes the difficulty in countering and neutralizing ROS induced by BPA, causing damage to clam tissues and reducing the clam’s ability to produce antioxidants that mitigate the toxicity [28, 97].

In the current work, the neurotoxicity of BPA on the R. decussatus digestive gland was evaluated by quantifying the AChE activity in order to investigate its connection with oxidative stress. Herein, a highly significant inhibition in the AChE activity was reported, with 52 and 80% reduction percentages in clams subjected to 1 and 5 µg/L of BPA, respectively, as compared to the control group. This finding is corroborated by prior studies conducted on several organisms, which observed a decrease in AChE activity when subjected to BPA [17, 81, 98, 99]. The neurotoxic effects of BPA on AChE can be explained by its interactions with amino acids in the enzyme’s active site, mainly in the peripheral anionic binding site and acyl binding site, as revealed in a previous study by Yilmaz et al. [100]. The inhibition of AChE by neurotoxic bisphenols caused inhibition in ACh hydrolysis, resulting in an overabundance of ACh, which in turn stimulates cholinergic receptors and disrupts nerve function [101, 102].

BPA-induced DNA change in the clam digestive glands was evidenced in this study by a significant increase in the percentage of tailed cells, tail length, tail DNA percentage, and tail moment, with BPA concentration-dependent.

Our findings are in complete agreement with the earlier works on aquatic invertebrates, for example, the genotoxicity potential of BPA that was detected in the somatic cells of D. magna and C. riparius [89], the sperm cells and hemocytes of the amphipods Echinogammarus veneris and Gammarus aequicauda [103], and the adductor muscles of the bivalve Lithophaga lithophaga [16]. Dose-dependent DNA damage might be related to a surplus of ROS production, causing malfunction of the antioxidant defense system [60]. BPA enhances redox imbalance and participates in the free radical cascade, which is likely the reason for DNA impairments [16, 89].

Due to its lipophilic nature, BPA has the ability to accumulate in the digestive gland, making it a possible organ susceptible to the damaging effects of BPA. The high sensitivity of epithelial cells lining the digestive gland tubules to the deleterious impacts of numerous marine contaminants is directly attributed to their role in metabolism as well as the detoxification process [104]. Herein, the histological examination of R. decussatus digestive gland subjected to 1 and 5 µg/L of BPA for 21 days revealed distinct histological alterations. Under exposure to 1 µg/L of BPA, hemocyte infiltration and fibrosis were observed in the damaged intertubular connective tissues, and the atrophied digestive tubules with vacuolization in the digestive epithelial cells were also recorded. BPA exposure induced an inflammatory response in the R. decussatus digestive gland through the mediation of the recruitment of hemocytes in damaged tissue. As hemocyte infiltration is the main internal immune defense of bivalves for detoxification, it has been associated with significant histopathological damage produced by hazardous substances [105, 106]. In bivalves, intertubular connective tissue fibrosis is a common pathological feature of digestive gland tissue under chronic exposure to pollutants. It occurs through the proliferation of fibroblasts inside connective tissue, destroying tissue structure and function. Thus, fibrosis is considered a good biomarker of environmental quality [48]. Digestive tubule atrophy is a commonly observed lesion in bivalves subjected to environmental contamination [48, 49]. It appears as a dilation of the tubular lumen and diminution of the tubular lining, leading to failure of digestive gland functions [107]. The vacuoles of digestive cells are normally connected to a system of heterophagosomes and lysosomes responsible for intracellular digestion [108,109,110]. However, the increase in vacuolization in digestive gland cells is related to a sudden increase in the lysosome volume in bivalves when exposed to xenobiotics of both organic and inorganic origins [111,112,113].

In addition to previous histological aberrations, severe lesions were recorded in digestive glands subjected to 5 µg/L of BPA, including the presence of necrotic digestive tubules and the presence of brown cells associated with lipofuscin-like pigments in the intertubular connective tissue. Exposure to harmful chemicals induces necrosis, eliciting a pro-inflammatory reaction in the neighbouring cells [114]. BPA was recorded to cause a necrotic pathway, as reported by Benjamin et al. [62], under continued exposure to 3 µg/L of BPA. The accumulation of lipofuscin granules, byproducts of lipid peroxidation consisting of lipids and proteins, in the digestive gland tissues of bivalves exposed to environmental contamination resulted from the alteration in the lysosomes of digestive gland epithelial cells [115]. It is a good indicator of tissue deterioration through the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids in the digestive gland by free oxygen radicles [116,117,118].

The qualitative histopathological assessment with semi-quantitative and quantitative histopathological analyses presents valuable information for the health status of marine organisms [119, 120]. Therefore, this study used a histopathological condition index approach in the digestive gland of R. decussatus clams to enable the integration of all alterations into a single value to facilitate the comparison between the health statuses of clams and detect the extent and severity of histopathological changes after exposure to different concentrations of BPA. Based on the histopathological condition indices of the digestive gland, exposure of clams to different BPA concentrations (1 and 5 µg/L) for 21 days showed significant differences compared with the control clams. The highest value of the histopathological condition index was recorded in clams exposed to BPA of 5 µg/L concentration, which was significantly different from other clam groups, followed by clams subjected to BPA with 1 µg/L concentration (moderate Ih) and control clams (low Ih). These results indicate that the digestive gland of clams exposed to BPA of 5 µg/L concentration was more impacted than the digestive gland of clams exposed to BPA of 1 µg/L concentration. Consistently, previous studies on metals and nanoparticles’ impact on the digestive glands of Mytilus galloprovincialis revealed a similar histopathological condition index pattern, as high pollutant doses showed significant differences compared to the control group [119, 121].

The present study also used the morphometric analysis of the digestive gland tubules to detect the variations between groups in the areas of the digestive tubule lumen and wall. The present result revealed atrophy in tubules in the two BPA-treated groups (1 and 5 µg/L) in a concentration-dependent manner through significant increases in the values of the relative digestive tubule lumen area and significant decreases in the values of the relative digestive tubule wall area as compared with the control group. Overall, the present study indicated that chronic exposure of R. decussatus clams to BPA (1 and 5 µg/L) led to an increase in the prevalence of histopathological alterations in the digestive gland tissues compared to the control clams.

In line with the current results, Benjamin et al. [62] indicated similar histological responses like hemocyte infiltration in the intertubular spaces with tubular atrophy, vacuolations, necrosis, fibrosis, and lipofuscin aggregation in the tissues of Corbicula fluminea at different concentrations of BPA (1, 2, and 3 µg/L) under a 21-day exposure. Jenzri et al. [17] documented an inflammatory reaction characterized by a significant infiltration of dark nucleated cells in the sea cucumber respiratory tree subjected to BPA. Also, similar histological alterations have been recorded in the digestive glands of bivalves subjected to different environmental xenobiotics [27, 48, 49, 110, 122,123,124,125]. The variation in histological alterations proves that R. decussatus clams are good indicators of BPA. As histopathological lesions, including tubular atrophy, necrosis of digestive tubules and intertubular tissue, fibrosis, and inflammation, can potentially serve as biomarkers for assessing environmental quality [48].

Conclusion

To summarize, the current results revealed the toxic effects of chronic BPA exposure on R. decussatus. 21-day treatment with BPA caused significant impairments to the clam digestive gland, which might be the basis of a series of subsequent body responses. Survival analysis showed that minimal mortality occurred only at an elevated BPA concentration (5 µg/L), emphasizing that the effect of BPA on clam survival was dose-dependent. Our study demonstrated that exposure to BPA impacted the R. decussatus antioxidant defense system due to its toxic effect. Furthermore, there is a significant reduction in AChE activity, indicating a disturbance in the cholinergic function. Genotoxicity and histological alterations in the digestive gland tissues were also detected. More in-depth, this work highlighted the importance of a multi-marker approach to draw a complete picture of the chemical toxicity of marine bivalves since each single biomarker offers different types of complementary information, which is a primary asset in this study type. Finally, in our holistic approach, the clam R. decussatus has shown its usefulness as a biomonitor species for detecting the impact of BPA pollution in marine ecosystems.

Fig. 1
figure 1

(A) The study organism, the grooved carpet clam Ruditapes decussatus (scale = 1 cm; the length between two successive long lines) and (B) Map showing the sampling site, El-Anfoshy Bay (red circle) in Alexandria city, Egypt, from which Ruditapes decussatus individuals were collected during October 2023. Small map (upper left corner) showing lower Egypt and the sampling site (red square)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curves showing cumulative survival probabilities of Ruditapes decussatus exposed to bisphenol A (1 µg/L “blue, solid line” and 5 µg/L “yellow, dashed line”) in comparing with a control group “grey, dotted line” for a period of 21 days. Marks (/) indicate censored data, i.e., clams at the respective treatment levels survived till the end of the experiment (pooled analysis, n = 40 individuals/concentration)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Average of biomarker responses estimated in Ruditapes decussatus digestive gland after exposure to water-borne bisphenol A (1 and 5 µg/L) for 21 days in comparing with a control group. (A) malondialdehyde (MDA) level (nmol/mg protein), (B) reduced glutathione (GSH) level (µg/mg protein), (C) catalase (CAT) activity (U/mg protein), and (D) acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity (nmol/min/mg protein). Values are represented as mean ± SE; n = 3. Different letters (a, b, and c) indicate significant variations (p ≤ 0.05) among groups based on a one-way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey’s HSD test. Treatments vs. control group: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, and *** p ≤ 0.001

Fig. 4
figure 4

Photomicrographs of comet assay (DNA damage) in Ruditapes decussatus cells isolated from digestive gland tissues following exposure to different bisphenol A concentrations (1 and 5 µg/L) for a period of 21 days of experimental time comparing with a control group. (A) control, (B) 1 µg/L, and (C) 5 µg/L. Abbreviations: H: head and T: tail

Fig. 5
figure 5

Average DNA damage by comet assay measured in Ruditapes decussatus cells isolated from digestive gland tissues after 21 days of exposure to water-borne bisphenol A (1 and 5 µg/L) in comparing with a control group. (A) percentage of tailed cells (%), (B) tail length (µm), (C) DNA percentage in the comet tail (%), and (D) tail moment (Arbitrary units). Values are represented as mean ± SE; n = 5. Different letters (a, b, and c) indicate significant variations (p ≤ 0.05) among groups based on a one-way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey’s HSD test. Treatments vs. control group: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, and *** p ≤ 0.001

Fig. 6
figure 6

Light photomicrographs of transverse sections, 5 μm in thickness and stained with H&E, through the Ruditapes decussatus digestive glands showing histopathological alterations in the digestive gland structure after exposure to different concentrations of bisphenol A (BPA) for 21 days in comparing with the normal structure of a control group. (A) Digestive glands of the control group showing normal structure with digestive tubules that are composed of a single layer of digestive (white wide arrow) and basophilic (black wide arrow) epithelial cells surrounding a narrow tubular lumen and normal intertubular connective tissue connecting these tubules, (B) Digestive glands subjected to 1 µg/L of BPA showing fused and atrophied digestive tubules represented by a diminution in the thickness of the epithelial cell layer and widening of the tubular lumen, and (C-D) Digestive glands subjected to 5 µg/L of BPA showing necrotic tubules, necrotic intertubular connective tissue, and the presence of lipofuscin pigment (black arrowhead). (dt) digestive tubule, (ec) epithelial cells, (tl) tubule lumen, (it) intertubular tissue, (ft) fused tubules, (at) atrophied tubules, (nt) necrotic tubules, and (ni) necrotic intertubular tissue

Fig. 7
figure 7

Light photomicrographs of transverse sections, 5 μm in thickness and stained with H&E, through the Ruditapes decussatus digestive glands showing histopathological alterations in the digestive gland structure after exposure to different concentrations of bisphenol A (BPA) for 21 days in comparing with the normal structure of a control group. (A-B) Digestive glands of the control group showing normal structure with digestive tubules that are composed of a single layer of digestive (white wide arrow) and basophilic (black wide arrow) epithelial cells, surrounding a narrow tubular lumen, and normal intertubular connective tissue connecting these tubules, (C-D) Digestive glands subjected to 1 µg/L of BPA showing atrophied digestive tubules, represented by a diminution in the thickness of the epithelial cell layer and widening of the tubular lumen, hemocyte infiltration around the damaged digestive gland tubules, fibrosis in the intertubular connective tissue, and tubular vacuolation with disorganization of the lining epithelium, and (E-J) Digestive glands subjected to 5 µg/L of BPA showing atrophied and necrotic tubules and necrotic intertubular connective tissue with heavy hemocyte infiltration, especially granulocytes, tubular vacuolation, and the presence of brown cells associated with lipofuscin-like pigments (black arrowhead). (dt) digestive tubule, (ec) epithelial cells, (tl) tubule lumen, (it) intertubular tissue, (at) atrophied tubules, (hi) hemocyte infiltration, (f) fibrosis, (v) vacuoles, (nt) necrotic tubules, and (ni) necrotic intertubular tissue

Fig. 8
figure 8

Semi-quantitative and quantitative analyses of the histopathological alterations of the digestive gland of Ruditapes decussatus clams after exposure to water-borne bisphenol A (1 and 5 µg/L) for 21 days in comparing with a control group. (A) The semi-quantitative histopathological condition indices (Ih) of the digestive gland and (B) Histomorphometric changes of the lumen and epithelial areas of the digestive gland tubules. Values are represented as mean ± SE; n = 5. Different letters (a, b, and c) indicate significant variations (p ≤ 0.05) among groups of the same parameter based on a one-way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey’s HSD test. Treatments vs. control group: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, and *** p ≤ 0.001

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Awad ME, Shaltout NA, Madkour FF, El-Regal MA, El-Sayed HS, El-Wazzan E. Ocean acidification impact on the grooved carpet shell clam (Ruditapes decussatus). Egypt J Aquat Biol Fish. 2019;23(5):169–82. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejabf.2019.63255.

  2. Sami M, Mohammad DA, Sallam AED, Mohammed SZ. Seed rearing of Ruditapes decussatus (Bivalvia: Mollusca) using two culture techniques. Azhar Bull Sci. 2016;27(2):51–66.

  3. Cravo A, Pereira C, Gomes T, Cardoso C, Serafim A, Almeida C, Rocha T, Lopes B, Company R, Medeiros A, Norberto R, Pereira R, Araújo, Bebianno MJ. A multibiomarker approach in the clam Ruditapes decussatus to assess the impact of pollution in the Ria Formosa lagoon, South Coast of Portugal. Mar Environ Res. 2012;75:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2011.09.012.

  4. Esposito G, Meloni D, Abete MC, Colombero G, Mantia M, Pastorino P, Prearo M, Pais A, Antuofermo E, Squadrone S. The bivalve Ruditapes decussatus: a biomonitor of trace elements pollution in Sardinian coastal lagoons (Italy). Environ Pollut. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.098.

  5. De Marchi L, Rocha RJM, Rodrigues AC, Soares AM, Pretti C, Chiellini F, Freitas R. Environmental fate of multistressors on carpet shell clam Ruditapes decussatus: Carbon nanoparticles and temperature variation. Sustainability. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124939.

  6. Sellami B, Khazri A, Louati H, Boufahja F, Dellali M, Sheehan D, Aissa P, Ridha Driss M, Mahmoudi E, Beyrem H. Effects of permethrin on biomarkers in Mediterranean clams (Ruditapes decussatus). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2014;5(92):574–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-014-1225-6.

  7. Michałowicz J, Bisphenol A. Sources, toxicity and biotransformation. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014;37(2):738–. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2014.02.003.  58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorini F, Bustaffa E, Coi A, Iervasi G, Bianchi F. Bisphenols as environmental triggers of thyroid dysfunction: clues and evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082654.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Corrales J, Kristofco LA, Steele WB, Yates BS, Breed CS, Williams ES, Brooks BW. Global assessment of bisphenol A in the environment: review and analysis of its occurrence and bioaccumulation. Dose-Response. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559325815598308.

  10. Almeida S, Raposo A, Almeida-González M, Carrascosa C, Bisphenol A. Food exposure and impact on human health. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2018;17(6):1503–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Manoli E, Voutsa D. Food containers and packaging materials as possible source of hazardous chemicals to food. Hazardous Chemicals Associated with Plastics in the Marine Environment. Hdb Environ Chem. 2019;78:19–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma Y, Liu H, Wu J, Yuan L, Wang Y, Du X, Wang R, Marwa PW, Petlulu P, Chen X, Zhang H. The adverse health effects of bisphenol A and related toxicity mechanisms. Environ Res. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108575.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu J, Zhang L, Lu G, Jiang R, Yan Z, Li Y. Occurrence, toxicity and ecological risk of Bisphenol A analogues in aquatic environment: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111481.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Czarny-Krzymińska K, Krawczyk B, Szczukocki D. Bisphenol A and its substitutes in the aquatic environment: occurrence and toxicity assessment. Chemosphere. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Canesi L, Fabbri E. Environmental effects of BPA: Focus on aquatic species. Dose-Response. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559325815598304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Abd Elkader HTAE, Al-Shami AS. Microanatomy and behaviour of the date mussel’s adductor and foot muscles after chronic exposure to bisphenol A, with inhibition of ATPase enzyme activities and DNA damage. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2023.109684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jenzri M, Gharred C, Bouraoui Z, Guerbej H, Jebali J, Gharred T. Assessment of single and combined effects of bisphenol-A and its analogue bisphenol-S on biochemical and histopathological responses of sea cucumber Holothuria poli. Mar Environ Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.106032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Canesi L, Betti M, Lorusso LC, Ciacci C, Gallo G. In vivo’effects of Bisphenol A in Mytilus hemocytes: modulation of kinase-mediated signalling pathways. Aquat Toxicol. 2005;71(1):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2004.10.011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Canesi L, Borghi C, Ciacci C, Fabbri R, Vergani L, Gallo G. Bisphenol-A alters gene expression and functional parameters in molluscan hepatopancreas. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007;276(1–2):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2007.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Balbi T, Franzellitti S, Fabbri R, Montagna M, Fabbri E, Canesi L. Impact of bisphenol A (BPA) on early embryo development in the marine mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis: effects on gene transcription. Environ Pollut. 2016;100(218):996–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.050.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheir SK, Mohamad AH, Osman GY, Abd Elhafez AR. Acute and chronic effects of Bisphenol A on hormonal disruption and histological alterations in the freshwater clam, Caelatura nilotica (Cailliaud, 1827). Egypt J Aquat Biol Fish. 2020;24(7):397–426. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejabf.2020.120508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang Y, Zhou W, Sun S, Du X, Han Y, Shi W, Liu G. Immunotoxicity and neurotoxicity of bisphenol A and microplastics alone or in combination to a bivalve species, Tegillarca granosa. Environ Pollut. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115115.

  23. Rodrıguez-Ariza A, Rodrıguez-Ortega MJ, Marenco JL, Amezcua O, Alhama J, Lopez-Barea J. Uptake and clearance of PCB congeners in Chamaelea gallina: response of oxidative stress biomarkers. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003;134(1):57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1532-0456(02)00207-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Slobodskova VV, Solodova EE, Chelomin VP. DNA damage (Comet assay) as biomarker of cd exposure in marine seed scallops Mizuhopecten yessoensis age 1 year. J Environ Sci Eng. 2010;4(10):63–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Slobodskova VV, Solodova EE, Slinko EN, Chelomin VP. Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cadmium in gill cells of the clam Corbicula japonica using the comet assay. Russ J Mar Biol. 2010;36(4):311–15. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074010040103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Munari M, Marin MG, Matozzo V. Effects of the antidepressant fluoxetine on the immune parameters and acetylcholinesterase activity of the clam Venerupis philippinarum. Mar Environ Res. 2013;94:32–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.11.007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Joshy A, Sharma SK, Mini KG, Gangadharan S, Pranav P. Histopathological evaluation of bivalves from the southwest coast of India as an indicator of environmental quality. Aquat Toxicol. 2022;243:106076 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2022.106076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. El Ayeb N, Béjaoui M, Muhr H, Touaylia S, Mahmoudi E. Behaviour and biochemical responses of the marine clam Ruditapes decussatus exposed to phosphogypsum. Environ Technol. 2021;42(23):3651–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2020.1740332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Livingstone DR. Contaminated-stimulated reactive oxygen species production and oxidative damage in aquatic organisms. Mar Pollut Bull. 2001;42(8):656–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00060-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Correia AD, Costa MH, Luis OJ, Livingstone DR. Age-related changes in antioxidant enzyme activities, fatty acid composition and lipid peroxidation in whole body Gammarus locusta (Crustacea: Amphipoda). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2003;289(1):83–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(03)00040-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Peters LD, Porte C, Albaigés J, Livingstone DR. 7-Ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase (EROD) activity and antioxidant enzyme activities in larvae of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) from the north coast of Spain. Mar Pollut Bull. 1994;28(5):299–04. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-326X(94)90154-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ringwood AH, Conners DE. The effects of glutathione depletion on reproductive success in oysters, Crassostrea virginica. Mar Environ Pollut. 2000;50(1–5):207–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-1136(00)00069-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Abele D, Burlando B, Viarengo A, Pörtner HO. Exposure to elevated temperatures and hydrogen peroxide elicits oxidative stress and antioxidant responses in the Antarctic intertidal limpet Nacella concinna. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1998;120B(2):425–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0491(98)10028-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Paital B, Chainy GBN. Antioxidant defenses and oxidative stress parameters in tissues of mud crab (Scylla serrata) with reference to changing salinity. Comp Biochem Physiol. 2010;151 C(1):142–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2009.09.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dai Y, Dong Y, Yang F, Chen Z, Jia J, Wu H, Chen Z. Effects of pH and salinity on survival, growth, and enzyme activities in juveniles of the sunray surf clam (Mactra chinensis Philippi). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsirep.2023.100114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Abele-Oeschger D, Oeschger R. Hypoxia-induced autoxidation of hemoglobin in the benthic invertebrates Arenicola marina (Polychaeta) and Astarte borealis (Bivalvia) and the possible effects of sulphide. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 1995;187(1):63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(94)00172-A.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lagadic L, Caquet T, Amiard JC, Ramade F. Use of biomarkers for environmental quality assessment. 1st ed. Paris: CRC; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Owen JB, Butterfield DA. Measurement of oxidized/reduced glutathione ratio. Methods Mol Biol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-756-3_18. 648:269 – 77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pisoschi AM, Pop A. The role of antioxidants in the chemistry of oxidative stress: a review. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;97:55–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.040.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Telahiguea K, Rabeha I, Hajjib T, Trabelsia W, Bejaouia S, Choubac L, El Cafsia M’, Soudani N. Effects of acute mercury exposure on fatty acid composition and oxidative stress biomarkers in Holothuria forskali body wall. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019;169:516–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.051.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kaptaner B, Yılmaz C, Aykut H, Doğan E, Fidan C, Bostancı M, Yıldız F, Bisphenol S leads to cytotoxicity-induced antioxidant responses and oxidative stress in isolated rainbow trout (Oncorhyncus mykiss) hepatocytes. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(12):7657–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06771-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Vlahogianni T, Dassenakis M, Scoullos MJ, Valavanidis A. Integrated use of biomarkers (superoxide dismutase, catalase and lipid peroxidation) in mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis for assessing heavy metals’ pollution in coastal areas from the Saronikos Gulf of Greece. Mar Pollut Bull. 2007;54(9):1361–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.05.018.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rilievo G, Fabrello J, Roverso M, Bogialli S, Matozzo V. Effects of the fragrance galaxolide on the biomarker responses of the clam Ruditapes philippinarum. J Mar Sci Eng. 2021;9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9050509.

  44. Duca G, Travin S. Reactions’ mechanisms and applications of hydrogen peroxide. Am J Phys Chem. 2020;9(2):36–44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpc.20200902.13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Schmatz R, Mazzanti CM, Spanevello R, Stefanello N, Gutierres J, Corrêa M, da Rosa MM, Rubin MA, Schetinger MRC, Morsch VM. Resveratrol prevents memory deficits and the increase in acetylcholinesterase activity in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009;610(1–3):42–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.03.032.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Slobodskova VV, Kukla SP, Chelomin VP. An analysis of the quality of the marine environment based on determination of the genotoxicity of DNA in the gill cells of the Yesso Scallop, Mizuhopecten yessoensis (Jay, 1856). Russ J Mar Biol. 2015;41(6):495–98. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074015060139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Slobodskova VV, Zhuravel EV, Kukla SP, Chelomin VP. Evaluation of DNA damage in the marine mussel Crenomytilus grayanus as a genotoxic biomarker of pollution. J Ocean Univ China. 2019;1(18):159–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-019-3573-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Costa PM, Carreira S, Costa MH, Caeiro S. Development of histopathological indices in a commercial marine bivalve (Ruditapes decussatus) to determine environmental quality. Aquat Toxicol. 2013;126:442–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2012.08.013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cuevas N, Zorita I, Costa PM, Franco J, Larreta J. Development of histopathological indices in the digestive gland and gonad of mussels: integration with contamination levels and effects of confounding factors. Aquat Toxicol. 2015;162:152–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.03.011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Arrighetti F, Landro SM, Lambre ME, Penchaszadeh PE, Teso V. Multiple-biomarker approach in the assessment of the health status of a novel sentinel mussel Brachidontes rodriguezii in a harbor area. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019;140:451–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Moore MN, Allen JI. A computational model of the digestive gland epithelial cell of marine mussels and its simulated responses to oil-derived aromatic hydrocarbons. Mar Environ Res. 2002;54(3–5):579–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-1136(02)00166-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dimitriadis VK, Domouhtsidou GP, Cajaraville MP. Cytochemical and histochemical aspects of the digestive gland cells of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis (L.) in relation to function. J Mol Histol. 2004;5(35):501–09. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:hijo.0000045952.87268.76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Faggio C, Tsarpali V, Dailianis S. Mussel digestive gland as a model tissue for assessing xenobiotics: an overview. Sci Total Environ. 2018;636:220–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.264.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang X, Huang W, Wei S, Shang Y, Gu H, Wu F, et al. Microplastics impair digestive performance but show little effects on antioxidant activity in mussels under low pH conditions. Environ Pollut. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113691.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Cajaraville MP, Diez G, Marigómez JA, Angulo E. Responses of basophilic cells of the digestive gland of mussels to petroleum hydrocarbon exposure. Dis Aquat Org. 1990;9(3):221–28. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao009221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Aarab N, Lemaire-Gony S, Unruh E, Hansen PD, Larsen BK, Andersen OK, Narbonne JF. Preliminary study of responses in mussel (Mytilus edilus) exposed to bisphenol A, diallyl phthalate and tetrabromodiphenyl ether. Aquat Toxicol. 2006;78(1):S86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.02.021.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ji C, Wei L, Zhao J, Wu H. Metabolomic analysis revealed that female mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis was sensitive to bisphenol A exposures. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014;37(2):844–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2014.02.015.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang Y, Wang Q, Ji Y, Zhang Q, Wu H, Xie J, Zhao J. Identification and mRNA expression of two 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase genes in the marine mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis following exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014;37(3):1243–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2014.04.027.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Juhel G, Bayen S, Goh C, Lee WK, Kelly BC. Use of a suite of biomarkers to assess the effects of carbamazepine, bisphenol A, atrazine, and their mixtures on green mussels, Perna viridis. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017;36(2):429–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3556.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Essawy AE, El Sherif SS, Osman GY, El Morshedy RM, Al-Nasser AS, Sheir SK. Immune responses, DNA damage and ultrastructural alterations of gills in the marine mussel Lithophaga lithophaga exposed to CuO nanoparticles. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(11):15800–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16889-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Abd Elkader HTAE, Al-Shami AS. Chronic exposure to bisphenol A induces behavioural, neurochemical, histological, and ultrastructural alterations in the ganglia tissue of the date mussels Lithophaga lithophaga. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29853-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Benjamin KB, Co EL, Competente JL, de Guzman DGH. Histopathological effects of bisphenol A on soft tissues of Corbicula fluminea Mull. J Toxicol Environ Health Sci. 2019;11:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-019-0386-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hatef A, Alavi SMH, Abdulfatah A, Fontaine P, Rodina M, Linhart O. Adverse effects of bisphenol A on reproductive physiology in male goldfish at environmentally relevant concentrations. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012;76:56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.09.021.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Ozhan K, Kocaman E. Temporal and spatial distributions of bisphenol A in marine and freshwaters in Turkey. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2019;76:246–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-018-00594-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Zaghloul FA, Khairy HM, Hussein NR. Assessment of phytoplankton community structure and water quality in the Eastern Harbour of Alexandria, Egypt. Egypt J Aquat Res. 2020;46(2):145–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2019.11.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Rocha TL, Gomes T, Pinheiro JP, Sousa VS, Nunes LM, Teixeira MR, Bebianno MJ. Toxicokinetics and tissue distribution of cadmium-based Quantum Dots in the marine mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Environ Pollut. 2015;204:207–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.05.008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Gonçalves JM, Sousa VS, Teixeira MR, Bebianno MJ. Chronic toxicity of polystyrene nanoparticles in the marine mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Chemosphere. 2021;287:132356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132356.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Vilke JM, Fonseca TG, Alkimin GD, Gonçalves JM, Edo C, d’ Errico G, Seilitz FS, Rotanderf A, Benedetti M, Regoli F, Lüchmann KH, Bebianno MJ. Looking beyond the obvious: the ecotoxicological impact of the leachate from fishing nets and cables in the marine mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. J Hazard Mater. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Liang J, Bi X, Dai W, Deng Y. Particulated microalgae composite (PMC) as substitute for live microalgae in culture of juvenile Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum (A. Adams and Reeve, 1850): a feasibility analysis. Indian J Fish. 2021. https://doi.org/10.21077/ijf.2021.68.3.114197-07.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Lowry O, Rosebrough N, Farr AL, Randall R. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193(1):265–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Draper H, Hadley M. Malondialdehyde determination as index of lipid peroxidation. Meth Enzymol. 1990;186:421–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(90)86135-I.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Beutler E, Duron O, Kelly BM. Improved method for the determination of blood glutathione. J Lab Clin Med. 1963;61:882–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Aykaç G, Uysal M, Yalçin AS, Koçak-Toker N, Sivas A, Öz H. The effect of chronic ethanol ingestion on hepatic lipid peroxide, glutathione, glutathione peroxidase and glutathione transferase in rats. Toxicol. 1985;36(1):71–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-483X(85)90008-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. In: Methods in enzymology, Academic press, New York, 1984;105(5):121 – 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3.

  75. Klots MG, Kim YC, Katsuwon J, Anderson AJ. Cloning, characterization and phenotypic expression in Escherichia coli of catF, which encodes the catalytic subunit of catalase isozyme CatF of Pseudomonas syringae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1995;43:656–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ogino K, Kodama N, Nakajima M, Yamada A, Nakamura H, Nagase H, Maekawa T. Catalase catalyzes nitrotyrosine formation from sodium azide and hydrogen peroxide. Free Radic Res. 2001;35(6):735–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715760100301241.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Ellman GL, Courtney KD Jr, Featherstone VA. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol. 1961;7(2):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res. 1988;175(1):184–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(88)90265-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Added A, Khalloufi N, Khazri A, Harrath AH, Mansour L, Nahdi S, Boufahja F, Aldahmash W, Alrefaei AF, Dellali M. Effects of an endocrine disruptor triclosan on Ruditapes decussatus: Multimarker and histological approaches. Animals. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030402.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Rasband WS, Image J. Image processing and analysis in Java. Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl-1206. 2012.

  81. Tybinka AM, Zaitsev OO, Zakrevska MV, Blishch HI, Shchebentovska OM. Morphometry of the digestive glands of terrestrial mollusk Cornu aspersum (Gastropoda, Helicidae). Zoodiversity. 2020;54(1):75–88. https://doi.org/10.15407/zoo2020.01.075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing; R foundation for statistical computing: Vienna, Austria. Available online: https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 21 Sep 2023.

  83. Therneau T. A package for survival analysis in S. R package version 2.38. 2015. https://cran.r-project.org/package=survival. Accessed 29 Nov 2023.

  84. Kassambara A, Marcin KM, Przemyslaw BP, Survminer. Drawing survival curves using ‘ggplot2’. R package version 0.4.6. 2019. http://www.sthda.com/english/rpkgs/survminer/ Accessed 12 Dec 2023.

  85. Wickham H, Chang W, Henry L, Pedersen TL, Takahashi K, Wilke C, Woo K, Yutani H, Dunnington D. ggplot2: Create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics. 2019. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/reference/ggplot2-package.html.

  86. Yamazaki E, Yamashita N, Taniyasu S, Lam J, Lam PK, Moon HB, et al. Bisphenol A and other bisphenol analogues including BPS and BPF in surface water samples from Japan, China, Korea and India. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015;122:565–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.09.029.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Li D, Chen Q, Cao J, Chen H, Li L, Cedergreen N, Xie H, Xie L. The chronic effects of lignin-derived bisphenol and bisphenol A in Japanese medaka Oryzias latipes. Aquat Toxicol. 2016;100(170):199–07. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.11.024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Lehmann DW, Levine JF, Law JM. Polychlorinated biphenyl exposure causes gonadal atrophy and oxidative stress in Corbicula fluminea clams. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(3):356–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926230701230288.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Park SY, Choi J. Genotoxic effects of nonylphenol and bisphenol A exposure in aquatic biomonitoring species: freshwater crustacean, Daphnia magna, and aquatic midge, Chironomus riparius. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2009;83:463–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-009-9745-1.

  90. Tang Y, Han Y, Zhang W, Yu Y, Huang L, Zhou W, Shi W, Tian D, Liu G. Bisphenol A and microplastics weaken the antimicrobial ability of blood clams by disrupting humoral immune responses and suppressing hemocyte chemotactic activity. Environ Pollut. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Ďurovcová I, Kyzek S, Fabová J, Makuková J, Gálová E, Ševčovičová A. Genotoxic potential of bisphenol A: a review. Environ Pollut. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Kaur K, Chauhan V, Gu F, Chauhan A. Bisphenol A induces oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in lymphoblasts from children with autism and unaffected siblings. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014;25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.07.030.

  93. Esperanza M, Seoane M, Servia MJ, Cid Á. Effects of Bisphenol A on the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and the clam Corbicula fluminea. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Abdel-Tawwab M, Hamed HS. Effect of bisphenol A toxicity on growth performance, biochemical variables, and oxidative stress biomarkers of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L). J Appl Ichthyol. 2018;34(5):1117–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13763.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Uçkun M. Assessing the toxic effects of bisphenol A in consumed crayfish Astacus leptodactylus using multi biochemical markers. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;29(17):25194–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17701-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Gnatyshyna L, Falfushynska H, Horyn O, Khoma V, Martinyuk V, Mishchuk O, et al. Biochemical responses of freshwater mussel Unio tumidus to titanium oxide nanoparticles, Bisphenol A, and their combination. Ecotoxicol. 2019;28(8):923–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-019-02090-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Viarengo A, Lowe D, Bolognesi C, Fabbri E, Koehler A. The use of biomarkers in biomonitoring: a 2-tier approach assessing the level of pollutant-induced stress syndrome in sentinel organisms. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007;146(3):281–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2007.04.011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Chen Q, Yin D, Jia Y, Schiwy S, Legradi J, Yang S, Hollert H. Enhanced uptake of BPA in the presence of nanoplastics can lead to neurotoxic effects in adult zebrafish. Sci Total Environ. 2017;609:1312–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Bellas J, Rial D, Valdés J, Vidal-Liñán L, Bertucci JI, Muniategui S, et al. Linking biochemical and individual-level effects of chlorpyrifos, triphenyl phosphate, and bisphenol A on sea urchin (Paracentrotus lividus) larvae. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(30):46174–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19099-w.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Yılmaz C, Khorsheed WM, Babat CF. In vitro and in silico evaluation of inhibitory effects of bisphenol derivatives on acetylcholinesterase of electric eel (Electrophorus electricus L). Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2022.109416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Jebali J, Khedher SB, Sabbagh M, Kamel N, Banni M, Boussetta H. Cholinesterase activity as biomarker of neurotoxicity: utility in the assessment of aquatic environment contamination. J Integr Coast Zone Manag. 2013;13(4):525–37. https://doi.org/10.5894/rgci430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Vidal-Liñán L, Bellas J, Salgueiro-González N, Muniategui S, Beiras R. Bioaccumulation of 4-nonylphenol and effects on biomarkers, acetylcholinesterase, glutathione-S-transferase and glutathione peroxidase, in Mytilus galloprovincialis mussel gills. Environ Pollut. 2015;200:133–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.02.012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Cosentino S, Aureli F, Iannilli V. Bisphenols A and its analogues induce genotoxic damage in marine and freshwater amphipods. Environ Adv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Kanapala VK, Arasada SP. Histopathological effect of paraquat (Gramoxone) on the digestive gland of freshwater snail Lymnaea luteola (Lamarck: 1799) (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Int J Sci Res Environ Sci. 2013;1(9):224–30. https://doi.org/10.12983/ijsres-2013-p224-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Villalba A, Carballal MJ, López C. Disseminated neoplasia and large foci indicating heavy haemocytic infiltration in cockles Cerastoderma edule from Galicia (NW Spain). Dis Aquat Org. 2001;46(3):213–16. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao046213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Sheir SK, Handy RD. Tissue injury and cellular immune responses to cadmium chloride exposure in the common mussel Mytilus edulis: modulation by lipopolysaccharide. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010;59(4):602–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-010-9502-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Wu Y, Gu E, Li H, Tian C, Feng C. Oxidative stress and histological changes in Corbicula fluminea exposed to nano-Al13 and monomeric Al coagulants. Environ Sci Nano. 2019;6(9):2736–48. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EN00320G.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Owen G. Lysosomes, peroxisomes and bivalves. Sci Progr. 1972;60(239):299–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Owen G. Feeding and digestion in the Bivalvia. Adv Comp Physiol Biochem. 1974;5:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-011505-1.50007-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Usheva LN, Vaschenko MA, Durkina VB. Histopathology of the digestive gland of the bivalve mollusk Crenomytilus grayanus (Dunker, 1853) from southwestern Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Russ J Mar Biol. 2006;32(3):166–72. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074006030047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Gold-Bouchot G, Sima-Alvarez R, Zapata-Perez O, Güemez-Ricalde J. Histopathological effects of petroleum hydrocarbons and heavy metals on the American oyster (Crassostrea virginica) from Tabasco, Mexico. Mar Pollut Bull. 1995;31(4–12):439–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-326X(95)00171-I.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Lowe DM, Fossato VU. The influence of environmental contaminants on lysosomal activity in the digestive cells of mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) from the Venice Lagoon. Aquat Toxicol. 2000;48(2–3):75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-445X(99)00054-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Zupan I, Kalafatic M. Histological effects of low atrazine concentration on zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha Pallas). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003;70(4):688–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-003-0039-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Zong WX, Thompson CB. Necrotic death as a cell fate. Genes Dev. 2006;20(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1376506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Moore MN, Livingstone DR, Widdows J, Lowe DM, Pipe RK. Molecular, cellular and physiological effects of oil-derived hydrocarbons on molluscs and their use in impact assessment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1987;316(1181):603–23. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1987.0041.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Lomovasky BJ, Morriconi E, Brey T, Calvo J. Individual age and connective tissue lipofuscin in the hard clam Eurhomalea exalbida. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2022;276(1–2):83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(02)00240-X.

  117. Vaschenko MA, Zhadan PM, Aminin DL, Almyashova TN. Lipofuscin-like pigment in gonads of Sea Urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius as a potential biomarker of marine pollution: a field study. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012;62(4):599–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-011-9733-4.

  118. Landro SM, Teso V, Arrighetti F. The panpulmonate limpet Siphonaria Lessonii Blainville, 1827 as a sentinel of contamination in coastal areas of Argentina. Ecol Indic. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Gürkan SE, Gürkan M. Toxicity of gamma aluminum oxide nanoparticles in the Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis): histopathological alterations and antioxidant responses in the gill and digestive gland. Biomarkers. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354750X.2021.1878558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Qu M, Xu J, Yang Y, Li R, Li T, Chen S, Di Y. Assessment of sulfamethoxazole toxicity to marine mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis): combine p38-MAPK signaling pathway modulation with histopathological alterations. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023;249:114365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114365.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Pinto J, Costa M, Leite C, Borges C, Coppolac F, et al. Ecotoxicological effects of lanthanum in Mytilus galloprovincialis: biochemical and histopathological impacts. Aquat Toxicol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.03.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Katalay S, Yavasoglu A, Yigitturk G, Oltulu F, Sari G, Yavasoglu N, Karabay U. Histological effects of pollution on gill and hepatopancreas tissues of black mussels (M. Galloprovincialis L.) from Izmir Bay of Turkey. Fresenius Environ Bull. 2016;25(5):1461–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Rocha TL, Sabóia-Morais SMT, Bebianno MJ. Histopathological assessment and inflammatory response in the digestive gland of marine mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis exposed to cadmium-based quantum dots. Aquat Toxicol. 2016;100(177):306–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.06.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Radwan EH, Mawgood AA, Ghonim AZ, El Nagar R. The possibility of using the fresh water bivalve, Spathopsis rubens, in the Nile River, El Mahmoudia water stream as bioindicator for pollution. J Limnol. 2018;1(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2691-3208.ijli-18-2476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Leis M, Noya Abad T, Martinez MF, Calcagno JA, Sabatini SE, Genovese G. Histological alterations as a recommended biomarker in the mussel Mytilus platensis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae) to study anthropic impact on seaports. Bivalvia; 2023. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4431813.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr. Mahmoud Meselhey, the technician at the Department of Biology and Geology, Faculty of Education, Alexandria University, for assistance and support with lab work. Dr. Claudia Bommarito (ISEM, University of Montpellier, France) for statistical advice, and the valuable help provided by Prof. Dr. Pedro Costa (NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal) concerning the histopathological analysis approach. We thank the editors and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and advice, which greatly improved the manuscript.

Funding

Open-access funding will be provided by the Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with the Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). The study did not obtain any particular funding from finance organizations in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. This work was all self-funded by the authors.

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ola Mohamed Nour and Aml Z.Ghoneim designed the study. Ola Mohamed Nour performed the experiments. Ola Mohamed Nour prepared Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8, and Salwa A. El-Saidy prepared Figs. 6 and 7. Ola Mohamed Nour and Salwa A. El-Saidy analysed and visualized the data. Salwa A. El-Saidy wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All co-authors contributed to the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ola Mohamed Nour.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Review Committee at Faculty of Education, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (ALEXU-IACUC), Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt (approval number AU102310020304). All methods were performed in accordance to the relevant guidelines and regulations, as stated in the ethical approval. All possible actions were taken to reduce animal suffering and stress during handling, sampling, and killing.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nour, O.M., El-Saidy, S.A. & Ghoneim, A.Z. Multiple-biomarker approach in the assessment of bisphenol A effect on the grooved carpet clam Ruditapes decussatus (Linnaeus, 1758). BMC Zool 9, 19 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-024-00211-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-024-00211-1

Keywords