Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Subfamily hypostominae: similarities and differences in testicular structure of amazonian fish

Abstract

Background

Hypostominae is a subfamily of the family Loricariidae that has a great diversity of species. Accordingly, testicular studies in fish can contribute to the phylogeny and taxonomy of species and to the comparison of reproductive aspects between species. Thus, this work aimed to characterize the testicular morphology and spermatogenesis of the Hypostominae species Baryancistrus xanthellus, Peckoltia oligospila and Hypancistrus zebra.

Results

B. xanthellus, P. oligospila and H. zebra had an anastomosed tubular type of testis. The germinal epithelium was continuous with unrestricted spermatogonia, and the proliferative, meiotic and spermiogenic phases were defined in all species. In the spermiogenic phase, spermatids were classified as initial, intermediate and final. Only in B. xanthellus in the final phase was there nuclear rotation. The sperm for the three species had a head with an oval shape and a single flagellum composed of the short midpiece, principal piece and end piece. B. xanthellus and P. oligospila showed a cylindrical flagellum and H. zebra showed projections that produced a flattened appearance.

Conclusions

On the basis testicular structure and ultrastructural characteristics of the germ cells, there was a greater relationship between B. xanthelus and P. oligospila, while H. zebra had particular characteristics. These aspects show that despite belonging to the same subfamily, the species have distinct biological characteristics.

Background

For several decades, knowledge of the testicular structure and spermatogenesis of fish has been important to understand the reproductive biology of the species and the mechanisms involved in the maturation of sperm[1,2,3]. More recently, these data have established different reproductive strategies, evolutionary adaptations to aquatic environments[4,5,6,7] and a broad understanding of phylogenetic and systematic relationships [8, 9]. However, there are few studies that address the morphological differences between species of the same family [9,10,11], or between subfamilies [12, 13]. These characteristics can help to understand the relationships between species and support the permanence of a species in a family or its removal.

In general, fish testes can be classified according to morphology as filiform, fringed or lobular [4] and as types regarding the organization of the germinal epithelium, i.e., anastomosed tubular when seminiferous tubule anastomosis occurs, and lobular because the epithelium is in a closed compartment and because the seminiferous tubules end at the periphery of the testis [14]. However, during the development of the germinal epithelium, spermatogenesis is subdivided into three phases: proliferative, where there are successive mitotic divisions of type A and B spermatogonia; meiotic, where primary and secondary spermatocytes pass through meiotic divisions giving rise to spermatids; and spermiogenesis where spermatids give rise to spermatozoa [15].

The family Loricariidae is endemic to South America and widespread in the Amazon region, and it is made up of many species that are exploited due to their high value in the aquarium market [16]. This family is subdivided into the subfamilies Delturinae, Hypoptopomatinae, Hypostominae, Lithogeninae, Loricariinae and Neoplecostominae, where Hypostominae stands out because it contains a greater number of species, ecologically and morphologically diverse, which hinders a more comprehensive phylogeny revision [17]. The main studies that address the morphological differences in this subfamily have focused on the external anatomy of the digestive tract and osteology [18,19,20], and there is no information as to whether the testicular characteristics represent a relationship between species. Among the species of this subfamily are: Baryancistrus xanthellus Rapp Py-Daniel et al. 2011, Peckoltia oligospila Günther 1864 and Hypancistrus zebra Isbrücker & Nijssen 1991. All have a high value in the ornamental fish market, but H. zebra is the species that stands out for being on the Red List of species threatened with extinction, which confers greater vulnerability. This is even more so because of the anthropic influence in the Amazon region, such as the establishment of hydroelectric dams, which cause damage to natural habitats and interfere with the life cycle, resulting in a great loss of species diversity [21].

Although they are species of the same subfamily, there is no information as to whether there are differences or similarities in testicular structure and organization of the germ cells. These basic biology parameters are of fundamental importance because they help to understand the life history of the species [22]. On the basis of this thinking, the present study aimed to compare the testicular structure and spermatogenesis of three species belonging to the subfamily Hypostominae, namely B. xanthellus, P. oligospila and H. zebra, to establish the proximity relations.

Results

Testis morphology

Macroscopically, the testes of the species B. xanthellus, P. oligospila and H. zebra (Fig. 1a-c), showed a color that varied from transparent to whitish. The testes were paired, lobular organs of equal size, and they were fused caudally, forming a single sperm duct leading to the urogenital papilla (Fig. 1d). The organ was covered by the tunica albuginea, which produces septa in the organ, forming two compartments. The interstitial compartment had blood vessels, myoid cells, interstitial or Leydig cells and connective tissue. The germinal compartment consisted of two cell types, Sertoli or somatic cells and germinal cells (spermatogonia, spermatocytes, spermatids and spermatozoa) (Fig. 1 e,f).

Fig. 1
figure 1

species morphology and testicular structure. a,b,c External morphology of the species; d Schematic representation of the testicle of the species where the organ is paired and forms a spermatic duct that leads to the urogenital papilla; e Photomicrography of the mature B. xanthellus gonad showing germinal and intestinal compartments Scale bar: 25 μm; f Schematic representation of the interstitial compartment containing blood vessels (BV), myoid cells (MY), interstitial or Leydig (LE) cells. Seminiferous tubules formed by germinative compartment, containing Sertoli cells (S), spermatogonia (SgA/SgB), spermatocytes (Sc), spermatids (St) and spermatozoa (Sz)

In the mature stage, B. xanthellus, P. oligospila and H. zebra showed testicular organization of the tubular anastomosis type, where the tubules are previously separated and then anastomosed (Fig. 2a-c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Analysis and morphometry of the germ cell and seminiferous tubule. a,b,c Testis with anastomosed (*) seminiferous tubules (dotted line); d Mean and comparative diameter of the seminiferous tubules of A spermatogonia (SgA), B spermatogonia (SgB), spermatocytes (Sc) and spermatids (St) between the species B. xanthellus (BX), P. oligospila (PO) and H. zebra (HZ); e,f,g,h,i,j Photomicrography of the seminiferous tubule, showing spermatogonia (SgA, SgB), spermatocytes (Sc) and spermatids (St), and spermatozoa (Sz) in the tubule lumen (L). Scale bar: a-c:25 μm, e-j: 10 μm

According to the size of the seminiferous tubules, B. xanthellus had the largest diameter (174.37 ± 70 μm), followed by H. zebra (102.97 ± 33.68 μm) and P. oligospila (101.54 ± 46.59 μm), and significant differences were observed only between H. zebra and P. oligospila (H = 209.23; df = 2; p > 0.05) (Fig. 2d). The proliferative, meiotic and spermiogenic phases were defined according to the organization of the germinal epithelium.

Proliferative phase

When analyzing the germinal epithelium of B. xanthellus, P. oligospila and H. zebra, a continuous epithelium was observed with the presence of Sertoli cells and spermatogenic cells: spermatogonia, spermatocytes, spermatids and spermatozoa (Fig. 2e-j). Sertoli cells showed the characteristics of spermatogenic cells, forming spermatic cysts within the seminiferous tubule (Fig. 2e); they had an elongated body and irregular electron-dense nucleus (Fig. 3e).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Photomicrography of spermatogenic cells during the germinative phases. a,b,c,d,e,f,g Proliferative phase: a schematic design demonstrating the similarities of spermatogenesis between the species and differences in the spermatozoa; b,c,d spermatogonia (SgA) with mitochondria (Mi) and nuages (N); e,f,g B spermatogonia (SgB) forming cell nest and Sertoli cell (S) with presence of nucleus (n); h,i,j meiotic phase; h spermatocyte in pachytene (pa); i spermatocyte in leptotene (le); j spermatocyte in diplotene (di); k,l,m,n,o,p spermiogenic phase; k final spermatids (St), in detail, the presence of the proximal (p) and distal (d) centrioles and mitochondria (Mi); l initial spermatids (St), nest cell, nucleus (n), vesicles (v) and mitochondria (Mi); m intermediate spermatids with spherical nucleus (n); note intermediate spermatid showing deep nuclear fossa (arrowhead); n,o,p spermatozoa with head (h), midpiece (Ip) and flagellum (f),secretion (*); note, longitudinal view of Sz, showing a nuclear fossa; spermatozoa with oval nucleus (n), detail of head (h). Scale bar: light microscopy-b,f: 10 μm; TEM- c-e, g-j: 5 μm, k-m: 2 μm, insert: 500 nm; SEM—n,p: 2 μm, insert: 1 μm

Spermatogonia were observed as two types, A and B, in all species, and were not restricted to a single position in the seminiferous tubule, characterizing an unrestricted spermatogonial epithelium (Fig. 3 a-g). Type A spermatogonia (SgA) were observed isolated in the germinal epithelium (Fig. 3 a-d). Ultrastructurally, they had a clear cytoplasm, with the presence of mitochondria and electron-dense structures known as nuages close to the nuclear envelope, and they had a nucleus with a condensed chromatin and a single nucleolus (Fig. 3c, d). In relation to the nuclear envelope, this structure was more evident in P. oligospila (Fig. 3c). The cell diameter of SgA in B. xanthelus, P. oligospila and H. zebra was 6.59 ± 0.97, 7.59 ± 0.86 and 8.21 ± 0.92 μm, respectively, and significant differences were observed between the three species. (H = 511.71; df = 2; p < 0.05) (Fig. 2d).

Type B spermatogonia (SgB) appeared smaller and formed cell nests, and the cytoplasm had few mitochondria. The nucleus contained condensed chromatin with heterochromatin adhered to the nuclear envelope, and a central or peripheral nucleolus (Fig. 3 e–g), and these spermatogonia showed a cell diameter for B. xanthelus, P. oligospila and H. zebra of 4.99 ± 0.54, 5.75 ± 0.67 and 6.05 ± 0.56 μm, respectively, with significant differences being observed between the three species. (H = 297,13; df = 2; p < 0.05). Overall, for spermatogonia A and B, H. zebra displayed the largest spermatogonia (Fig. 2d).

Meiotic phase

The primary spermatocytes formed nests near the wall of the seminiferous tubules, which are seen in different phases of prophase I (Fig. 3 h-j): leptotene is characterized by an ovoid nucleus with little condensed chromatin, showing some points of compaction and cytoplasm with little delimitation (Fig. 3i); in pachytene, the delimitation of the nucleus and nucleolus is not visible, and the condensed chromatin has a filamentous appearance (Fig. 3h); and in diplotene, chromosomes appear compacted with spots evident in the nucleus (Fig. 3j). Secondary spermatocytes were not seen. The diameter of the spermatocytes in B. xanthelus, P. oligospila and H. zebra was 3.92 ± 0.45, 4.35 ± 0.43 and 4.43 ± 0.47 μm, respectively, with no differences being observed between H. zebra and P. oligospila (H = 283.15; df = 2; p > 0.05) (Fig. 2d).

Spermiogenic phase

In the three species, spermatids showed specific cellular characteristics that revealed a subdivision into phases, i.e., initial, intermediate and final (Fig. 3 k-m). The initial spermatids formed cysts, in which the cells are connected by cytoplasmic bridges, and have a spherical nucleus, with condensed chromatin and nuclear fossa, and cytoplasm with vesicles and mitochondria (Fig. 3l). The intermediate ones had a nucleus with condensed chromatin with electron-lucid regions and nuclear fossa, and there was little cytoplasm (Fig. 3m). In the final spermatids, the nucleus was spherical, and there was sparse cytoplasm and mitochondria in the midpiece. In this phase, nuclear rotation was observed only in B. xanthellus, and the proximal centriole was located in the nuclear fossa, while the distal centriole was perpendicular to the proximal one (Fig. 3k). The diameter of the spermatids in B. xanthelus, P. oligospila and H. zebra was 1.81 ± 0.29, 2.09 ± 0.20 and 2.21 ± 0.22 μm, respectively, where significant differences were observed between the three species. (H = 302,15; df = 2; p < 0.05) (Fig. 2d).

The spermatozoa were characterized as having compact chromatin, absence of acrosome, loss of residual bodies and formation of a single flagellum (Fig. 3 n-p). In B. xanthellus, the head of the spermatozoa was oval, with a single flagellum consisting of a short midpiece with the presence of mitochondria, long principal piece and short end piece (Fig. 3n). In P. oligospila, the nucleus had an oval shape and showed the presence of electron-lucid zones, and the midpiece was elongated and possessed mitochondria, while the principal piece was cylindrical (Fig. 3o). In H. zebra, the nucleus was half-sphere shaped and showed electron-lucid regions, and the midpiece appeared bulky and possessed mitochondria (Fig. 3p), while the principal piece displayed lateral projections which gave it a flattened shape (Fig. 4 b-e). In P. oligospila and B. xanthellus lateral projections were not observed in principal piece of the flagellum (Fig. 4f, g) In all species, the principal piece of the flagellum showed a 9 + 2 axonemal pattern and the end piece 9 + 0 pairs of microtubules (Fig. 3a). TEM and SEM demonstrated that the sperm of B. xanthellus (Fig. 3n: insert) and H. zebra (Fig. 3p: insert and 4a) were immersed in a secretion. The diameter of the spermatozoa head in B. xanthelus, P. oligospila and H. zebra was 1.63 ± 0.13, 1.78 ± 0.13 and 1.82 ± 0.12 μm, respectively, and significant differences were observed between the three species. (H = 168.28; df = 2; p < 0.05). Overall, H. zebra had the largest spermatozoa head (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Photomicrography of sperm in the tubule lumen. a-e H. zebra: a Sperm immersed in secretion (*); b schematic design of sperm; c detail of the flagellum showing lateral projections (arrowhead) by SEM; d and e detail of the cross-section of the flagellum showing the lateral projections(arrowhead). f B. xanthellus g P. oligospila. Detail of the cross-section of the flagellum in both species. Scale bar: SEM- a: 2 μm, c: 3 μm; TEM- d,e: 1 μm

The testicular structure and the organization of the cells established the similarities and differences between the species studied in the subfamily (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Relation of loricarid species based on differences and similarities in organization of germinative cells. a H. zebra; b P. oligospila; c B. xanthellus (C)

Discussion

In this study, we compared testicular structure and spermatogenesis in three species of the family Loricariidae, subfamily Hypostominae. Despite the morphological diversity of testicular structures among the neotropical teleosts [23], B. xanthellus, P. oligospila and H. zebra have paired, lobular or saculiform testes, with color varying according to the gonadal stage. These characteristics are similar to those observed in the family Loricariidae [24,25,26].

The testicular structure for all species is of the anastomosed tubular type. This observed testicular structure is considered to be more basal within the phylogenetic classification of Teleostei [14]. Anastomosed tubular has also been seen in Pterygoplichthys disjunctivus [25], Hypostomus francisci [27], and Harttia torrenticola [28], species that belong to the order Siluriforme, family Loricariidae.

Here, we emphasize that the development of the germinal cells of the three species occurs within cysts present throughout the seminiferous tubule. This characteristic considered as continuous epithelium is in accordance with the literature [29] and has been observed in other species of the family Loricariidae, belonging to different subfamilies: Loricariinae (Loricaria lentiginosa [30] and Harttia torrenticola [28]), Hypoptopomatinae (Pseudotocinclus tietensis [31], and Hypostominae (Hypostomus francisci [27]. It is worth mentioning that this characteristic of the epithelium varies according to the degree of development of the testis, where a species can have both types of epithelium as seen in Rachycentron canadum (L.) [32], Padogobius martensi [33] and Serrasalmus spilopleura [8]. We believe that this characteristic is related to the capacity to renew the gametogenic lineage; considering the species studied, because they have a continuous epithelium, it is possible to observe in the whole reproductive cycle the presence of germinal cells occupying the entire wall of the seminiferous tubule.

In the present study, types A and B spermatogonia differed in size between species, where the largest diameter was found in H. zebra. Although the spermatogenesis process is similar among fish, characteristics such as cell diameter differ between species, and in the case of the subfamily Hypostominae, this difference is even more evident when compared with species such as Pterygoplichthys disjunctivus, which have A spermatogonia with a diameter of 14.87 ± 0.22 μm [25] and Hypostomus francisci with a diameter of 8.2 ± 1.1 µm [27]. Possibly this characteristic may be associated with the reproductive biology of each species.

We found that B. xanthelus, P. oligospila and H. zebra had a distribution of spermatogonia along the seminiferous tubule, being characterized as unrestricted spermatogonial. According to the literature [15], this type is common in anastomosed testes, whereas restricted spermatogonia are often seen in lobular testes. Only primary spermatocytes with chromatin at different levels of condensation have been observed. Similar results have been reported for other teleosts, showing that at this stage of division, secondary spermatocytes are difficult to visualize due to rapid cell division [5, 34].

In spermiogenesis, we showed peculiarities in spermatid development. The nuclear fossa was evident in B. xanthellus, P. oligospila and H. zebra. The presence of the nuclear fossa was observed in the Loricariidae in the subfamilies Hypoptopomatinae (Hypoptopoma guentheri and Schizolecis guntheri), Neoplecostominae (Kronichthys heylandi and Neoplecostomus paranensis) and Loricariinae (Farowella oxyrryncha and Loricaria lata) [13]. This suggests that most of the members of the family Loricariidae have this biological characteristic.

In general, the spermatids from B. xanthelus, P. oligospila and H. zebra also showed similarities and differences related to the head and flagellum. In the observations reported in literature [35], characteristics such as round or oval head, short midpiece with few mitochondria and single or double flagellum are observed in the spermatozoa of the aquasperm type, considered primitive, adapted to external fertilization. In most fish with external fertilization, spermatozoa without an acrosome penetrates the oocyte, which is facilitated by the presence of the micropyle [36,37,38].

The flagellum had a standard 9 + 2 microtubular arrangement, but in H. zebra, lateral projections were observed, which gave the flagellum a flatter shape. These projections have also been observed in other species of loricariids [13]. The morphology of the flagellum as well as its molecular structure accounts for spermatic motility [39], and differences in spermatid morphology are useful tools for systematic analysis of different habitats and reproductive modes in fish [34]. We believe that these lateral projections help in the efficiency of motility in relation to energy expenditure, in view of the different characteristic habitats of the species. As an example, spermatozoa of H. zebra have intermediate vigor and a long sustained motility that provides less energy expenditure [40]. This condition can help in reproduction since this species is endemic to the Xingu River and lives in stream rapids.

A relevant fact was the presence of a secretion in the lumen of the seminiferous tubules of H. zebra and B. xanthelus, which made it difficult to visualize the plasma membrane of these sperm. This result differs from Pterygoplichthys disjunctivus [25], subfamily Hypostominae. However, for other Loricariidae subfamilies such as Hypoptopomatinae and Otothyrinae [13], the same difficulty in visualization the sperm membrane has been reported due to the presence of this secretion. According to the literature [41], these substances for fish can assist in the fertilization process and in increasing seminal volume.

Conclusions

On the basis of gonadal morphology, testicular structure, spermatozoa location and germ cell ultrastructural characteristics, we found that there is a greater relationship between B. xanthelus and P. oligospila. H. zebra has characteristics that differ from the others, although they are in the superorder Ostariophysia, in the same subfamily (Hypostominae) and are endemic species in the Amazon region. These results contribute to the understanding of spermatogenesis of neotropical species, Therefore, these findings are important for understanding the phylogeny of this very diverse group for enabling biotechnological studies such as cryopreservation of semen and induced reproduction of species in captivity, to guarantee a better strategy to survive in their environment.

Methods

Sample collection

The samples were collected between January 2019 and July 2019 in the middle Xingu River (3°12′52″ S, 51°11′23″). We collected 30 specimens of each species, namely B. xanthellus, P. oligospila, H. zebra, with the help of local fishermen, who sampled the fish by scuba diving. Captured fish were anesthetized with benzocaine hydrochloride (0.1 g.L–1) and euthanized with sodium pentobarbital solution (60–100 mg/kg). Subsequently, gonads were removed by ventral incision.

Light microscopy

Fragments of gonads in the maturing and mature stage of B. xanthelus, P. oligospila and H. zebra were fixed in Bouin’s solution for 24 h. The samples were then dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, cleared in xylene and infiltrated and embedded in paraffin [42]. Sections 5 μm thick were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), and stained sections were examined under a Carl Zeiss light microscope (AxioStar Plus 1,169,151).

Morphometry and statistical analysis

For morphometry only, testes in the mature stage of B. xanthelus, P. oligospila and H. zebra were evaluated, because this stage has the largest seminiferous tubules. A total of five specimens/species were analyzed, and for each specimen, the mean diameter of the 58 seminiferous tubules were measured. In each specimen, the mean diameter (n = 200) for each germ cell type (spermatogonia A and B, spermatocytes, spermatids and spermatozoa) were analyzed. Only cells that contained a nucleus were measured. Serial sections were cut, and the slides were evaluated under a photomicroscope with the software NIS-elements BR (4.00.07-bit), and measurements were made at 40X magnification. Each cell was overlaid with two dashed lines crossing at right angles in the middle of the cell, and the length of the segment of the line over that diameter of the cell was measured. The mean length of the two measurements was taken as the approximate diameter of the cell. Means were assessed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test and analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test (P < 0.05) (Zar, 1999). All analyses were performed using the R Development Core Team Program (2016).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Fragments of testis were fixed in Karnovsky’s solution (4% paraformaldehyde, 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4) for 24 h. After fixation, the fragments were washed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4 and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4 for 2 h. For TEM analysis, the fragments were dehydrated in an ascending acetone series and embedded in Epon 812. Ultra-thin sections were cut in a microtome and contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, followed by examination in a JEOL (JEM -100CX II) electron microscope. For SEM analysis, testicular sections and 500-µl aliquots of raw semen were fixed in Karnovsky’s solution and Then, a drop of the fixed semen sample was placed on a poly-L-lysine-coated coverslip.The samples were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (30 to 100%) and critical-point dried using CO2 and mounted on stubs, coated with gold and examined using a LEO 1430 SEM.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BV:

Blood vessels

LE:

Leydig cells

L:

Lumen

Mi:

Mitochondria

MY:

Myoid cells

N:

Nuages

n:

Nucleus

S:

Sertoli cells

Sc:

Spermatocytes

pa:

Spermatocyte in pachytene

le:

Spermatocyte in leptotene

di:

Spermatocyte in diplotene

SgA:

Spermatogonia A

SgB:

Spermatogonia B

St:

Spermatids

Sz:

Spermatozoa

h:

Head

Ip:

Midpiece

f:

Principal piece

v:

Vesicles

References

  1. Billard R. Spermatogenesis and spermatology of some teleost fish species. Reprod Nutr Développement. 1986;26:877–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang L, Li Y, Wu Y, Sun S, Song Q, Wei J, et al. Rln3a is a prerequisite for spermatogenesis and fertility in male fish. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2020;197: 105517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105517.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta S. The development of carp gonads in warm water aquaria. J Fish Biol. 1975;7:775–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Melo RMC, Arantes FP, Sato Y, dos Santos JE, Rizzo E, Bazzoli N. Comparative morphology of the gonadal structure related to reproductive strategies in six species of neotropical catfishes (Teleostei: Siluriformes). J Morphol. 2011;272:525–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gonçalves LAB, Silva GMF, Viana IKS, Hainfellner P, Ferreira MAP, Batlouni SR, Testicular structure and development of germ cells of Hypophthalmus marginatus Valenciennes, et al. Siluriformes: Pimelodidae. Anim Reprod Sci. 1840;2019:211.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martins YS, Arantes FP, Sato Y, dos Santos JE, Rizzo E, Bazzoli N. Comparative analysis of gonadal morphology in six fish species of the Incertae Sedis genera in Characidae of occurrence in the São Francisco River Basin. BRA Acta Zool. 2012;93:48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Melo Dias GC, Cassel M, Oliveira De Jesus LW, Batlouni SR, Borella MI. Spermatogonia, Germline Cells, and Testicular Organization in the Characiform Prochilodus lineatus Studied Using Histological, Stereological, and Morphometric Approaches. Anat Rec. 2017;300:589–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nóbrega RH, Quagio-Grassiotto I. Morphofunctional changes in Leydig cells throughout the continuous spermatogenesis of the freshwater teleost fish, Serrasalmus spilopleura (Characiformes, Characidae): An ultrastructural and enzyme study. Cell Tissue Res. 2007;329:339–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arantes FP, Silva FA, Santos JE, Rizzo E, Sato Y, Bazzoli N. Comparative morphology of gonads from six species of fish belonging to the family Anostomidae (Characiformes: Anostomidae). Rev Biol Trop. 2017;65:713–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fishelson L, Gon O, Holdengreber V, Delarea Y. Comparative spermatogenesis, spermatocytogenesis, and spermatozeugmata formation in males of viviparous species of clinid fishes (Teleostei: Clinidae, Blennioidei). Anat Rec. 2007;290:311–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fishelson L, Delarea Y, Gon O. Testis structure, spermatogenesis, spermatocytogenesis, and sperm structure in cardinal fish (Apogonidae, Perciformes). Anat Embryol (Berl). 2006;211:31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fishelson L. Comparison of testes structure, spermatogenesis, and spermatocytogenesis in young, aging, and hybrid cichlid fish (Cichlidae, Teleostei). J Morphol. 2003;256:285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spadella MA, Oliveira C, Quagio-Grassiotto I. Spermiogenesis and sperm ultrastructure in ten species of Loricariidae (Siluriformes, Teleostei). Zoomorphology. 2012;131:249–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Parenti LR, Grier HJ. Evolution and phylogeny of gonad morphology in bony fishes. Integr Comp Biol. 2004;44:333–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grier HJ. Cellular organization of the testis and spermatogenesis in fishes. Am Zool. 1981;21:345–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prang G. an Industry Analysis of the Freshwater Ornamental Fishery With Particular Reference To the Supply of Brazilian Freshwater Ornamentals To the Uk Market. Sci Mag UAKARI. 2008;3:7–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lujan NK, Armbruster JW, Lovejoy NR, López-Fernández H. Multilocus molecular phylogeny of the suckermouth armored catfishes (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) with a focus on subfamily Hypostominae. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015;1(82):269–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Armbruster J. The genus Peckoltia with the description of two new species and a reanalysis of the phylogeny of the genera of the Hypostominae (Siluriformes: Loricariidae). Zootaxa. 2008;1822:1–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Armbruster JW, Taphorn DC. A New Genus and Species of Weakly Armored Catfish from the Upper Mazaruni River, Guyana (Siluriformes: Loricariidae). Copeia. 2011;2011:46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Armbruster JW. Phylogenetic relationships of the suckermouth armoured catfishes (Loricariidae) with emphasis on the Hypostominae and the Ancistrinae. Zool J Linn Soc. 2004;141:1–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Winemiller KO, McIntyre PB, Castello L, Fluet-Chouinard E, Giarrizzo T, Nam S, Baird IG, Darwall W, Lujan NK, Harrison I, Stiassny ML. Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong. Science. 2016;351(6269):128–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bayona Perez IL, Mazzoni TS, Quagio-Grassiotto I. Cellular development of the germinal epithelium during the female and male gametogenesis of Chaetodon striatus (Perciformes: Chaetodontidae). Zygote. 2020;28(4):291–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Siqueira-Silva DH, da Silva RM, Nóbrega RH. Testis structure, spermatogonial niche and Sertoli cell efficiency in Neotropical fish. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2018;2019(273):218–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2018.09.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Duarte S, Araújo FG, Sales A, Bazzoli N. Morphology of gonads, maturity and spawning season of Loricariichthys spixii (siluriformes, loricariidae) in a subtropical reservoir. Brazilian Arch Biol Technol. 2007;50:1019–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jumawan JC, Herrera AA. Histological and ultrastructural characteristics of the testis of the invasive suckermouth sailfin catfish Pterygoplichthys disjunctivus (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from Marikina River. Philippines Tissue Cell. 2015;47:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2014.10.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Duarte S, Araújo FG, Bazzoli N. Reproductive plasticity of Hypostomus affinis (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) as a mechanism to adapt to a reservoir with poor habitat complexity. Zoologia. 2011;28:577–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sales CF, Domingos FFT, Brighenti LS, Ribeiro RIMA, Santos HB, Thomé RG. Biological variables of Hypostomus francisci (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from Itapecerica river, Minas Gerais state. Brazil An Acad Bras Cienc. 2016;88:1603–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Melo RMC, Gomes DD, Moreira DP, Gomes MR, Bazzoli N, Rizzo E. Comparative morphology of the reproductive system of seven species of ostariophysan fishes from the upper Das Velhas River. Brazil J Morphol. 2017;278:170–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Grier HJ. The germinal epithelium: its dual role in establishing male reproductive classes and understanding the basis for indeterminate egg production in female fishes. In: RL Creswell (ed) Proceedings of the Fifty-third Annual Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, November 2000, pp. 537– 552. Mississippi/Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, Fort Pierce.

  30. Guimarães-Cruz RJ, dos Santos JE, Santos GB. Gonadal structure and gametogenesis of Loricaria lentiginosa Isbrücker (Pisces, Teleostei, Siluriformes). Rev Bras Zool. 2005;22:556–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rodrigues-Filho JA, Honji RM, Mello PH, Borella MI, Hilsdorf AWS, Moreira RG. Reproductive biology of Pseudotocinclus tietensis (Siluriformes: Loricariidae: Hypoptopomatinae), a threatened fish species. Int J Aquat Biol. 2017;5:218–27.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brown-Peterson NJ, Grier HJ, Overstreet RM. Annual changes in germinal epithelium determine male reproductive classes of the cobia. J Fish Biol. 2002;60:178–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cinquetti R, Dramis L. Ultrastructural investigations of the testis of Padogobius martensi between annual breeding seasons. J Fish Biol. 2003;63:1402–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Senarat S, Jiraungkoorskul W, Kettratad J. Testicular structure and spermatogenesis of short mackerel, Rastrelliger brachysoma (Bleeker, 1851) in upper Gulf of Thailand. Asia-Pacific J Mol Biol Biotechnol. 2018;26:30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jamieson BG, Leung LP. Fish Evolution and Systematics: evidence from spermatozoa: with a survey of lophophorate, echinoderm and protochordate sperm and an account of gamete cryopreservation. Cambridge University Press, 1991.

  36. Brandão L, Arantes FP, Santos JE, Rizzo E, Bazzoli N. Reproductive variables of Brycon nattereri Günther, 1864 (Pisces: Characidae), an endangered commercial species. Anim Reprod Sci. 2020;213: 106272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yanagimachi R, Cherr G, Matsubara T, Andoh T, Harumi T, Vines C, et al. Sperm Attractant in the Micropyle Region of Fish and Insect Eggs1. Biol Reprod. 2013;88:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yanagimachi R, Harumi T, Matsubara H, Yan W, Yuan S, Hirohashi N, et al. Chemical and physical guidance of fish spermatozoa into the egg through the micropyle. Biol Reprod. 2017;96:780–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Saggiorato G, Elgeti J, Alvarez L, Jikeli JF, Kaupp UB, Gompper G. Human sperm steer with second harmonics of the flagellar beat. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1415. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01462-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Caldas JS, Godoy L. Sperm characterization of the endangered Amazonian fish Hypancistrus zebra: Basic knowledge for reproduction and conservation strategies. Anim Reprod Sci. 2019;204:117–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lahnsteiner F, Patzner RA. Spermiogenesis and structure of mature spermatozoa in blenniid fishes (Pisces, Blenniidae). J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 1990;22:565–76.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Prophet, E.B., Mills, B., Arrington, J.B., Sobin LH. Métodos Histotecnológicos. Inst Patol las Fuerzas Armadas los Estados Unidos América y Regist Patol los Estados Unidos América (arp).washingt DC. 1995.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Federal University of Para and Institute of Biological Science for physical support. I.K.S. Viana was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). Rossineide Martins da Rocha received a productivity grant from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (307688/2019-4). The authors gratefully acknowledge Institute Evandro Chagas (IEC) and Biologia Estrutural (UFPA) for use of the transmission electron microscope. The biological material was authorized by a permit from IBAMA-Instituto Brasileiro de Meio Ambiente e de Recursos Naturais Renováveis and FAO/MMA.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

I.K.S.V., M.A.P.F. and R.M.R. conceived and designed the study. I.K.S.V., Y.A.M and R.S.O. carried out the field and laboratory activities. I.K.S.V. planned the study, analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. J.C.D.P., G.M.F.S. and J.L.G.N. reviewed data analysis and contributed to the revision of the manuscript. M.A.P.F. and R.M.R. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. All authors read and approved the final paper.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivana Kerly S. Viana.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All applicable institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed per National Council for Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) and were performed in accordance with approved guidelines, CEUA No. 5557211118 (ID 001065).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viana, I.K.S., S., G.M.F., Pantoja, J.C.D. et al. Subfamily hypostominae: similarities and differences in testicular structure of amazonian fish. BMC Zool 7, 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-021-00106-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-021-00106-5

Keywords