Skip to main content
Download PDF

The comparative aspects of hystricomorph subplacenta: potential endocrine organ

BMC Zoology volume 6, Article number: 16 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The placenta of hystricomorph rodents, lagomorphs and some primates includes an unusual structure, termed a subplacenta, which essentially consists of trophoblastic cells located deep to the central implantation site within the area of decidualization. It has been suggested that the subplacenta is functionally important, although considerable controversy remains on the issue. In this context, our objective was to compare the architecture and structure of the subplacentas of different hystricomorph species, to investigate the possibility that it is active in hormone synthesis.

Methods

In total, the placentas of 3 capybaras (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris), 2 pacas (Agouti paca), 5 agoutis (Dasyprocta leporina), 5 rock cavies (Kerodon rupestris) and 3 guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) at different stages of pregnancy (early, middle and near term) were used for gross and microscopic examination. This included the preparation of latex injection casts, immunohistochemistry for steroidogenic enzymes, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Tissue steroid concentrations were also determined.

Results

The gross morphology and microvascular arrangement of the subplacentas were similar among the hystricomorphs studied including ultra-structural verification of cytotrophoblast and syncytiotrophoblast in all species. In guinea pigs, trophoblast cells exhibited characteristics consistent with intense metabolic and secretory activity in general. However, immuno-histochemical evidence also indicated that subplacental trophoblast expressed key steroidogenic enzymes, mainly in the chorionic villus region, consistent with tissue steroid concentrations.

Conclusions

The subplacentas within placentas of hystricomorph rodent species are structurally similar and, in guinea pigs, have potential for steroid hormone secretion from, at least the early stages of pregnancy.

Background

The success of viviparity in eutherian mammals is dependent on the establishment of a fully functional chorioallantoic placenta in order to sustain successful embryonic and fetal development. In this context, placental development from trophoblast is mediated in part by interactions between maternal endometrial and extra-embryonic tissues during the implantation process [1,2,3,4,5]. The placenta is responsible for maternal-fetal metabolic exchange supporting the nutrition and respiration of, and excretion by, the fetus [6,7,8] and in some species, it elaborates hormones providing endocrine support for the pregnancy [9]. The structures associated with the placenta are complex and, depending on species, may consist of the amnion, chorion, allantois, yolk sac, and decidual elements [10,11,12,13]. In addition, these extra-embryonic membranes have substantive importance in ontogeny.

Some species within the Hystricomorph and Lagomorph sub-orders of the Rodentia have a specialized structure within their placentas, called a subplacenta [14,15,16,17,18], that is unusual among mammals. The structure is represented by zone of chorionic ectoderm, which is located in the central excavation of the placenta and is limited to the area of decidualization [19]. The functions of this placental specialization remain unclear [1]. While some have speculated that the subplacenta might play an endocrine role, possibly gonadotrophin secretion [15, 20, 21], no definitive evidence exists to date. Uptake of histotroph [20, 22] or lactogen secretion [21] have also been suggested as possible functions. However, according to [23] none of these hypotheses has been resolved to a sufficient degree.

It is presumed that the subplacenta plays an important, specialized role during pregnancy in hystricomorph rodents [18, 24,25,26]. However, despite the fact that this structure has been investigated in numerous morphological studies, there is a dearth of information in the literature in regard to the functions of this unusual placental structure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe and compare the subplacentas from different hystricomorph species using morphological techniques. In addition, other approaches including latex injections, immunohistochemistry, scanning and transmission electron microscopy and analysis of tissue steroid concentrations were also employed in order to determine if hormone synthesis was likely. These new data were discussed along with existing literature to better define functional correlates that might provide insight into the evolution of the subplacenta of hystricomorph rodents.

Methods

Animals and gross morphology

In total, placentae were analyzed from 3 capybaras (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris), 2 pacas (Agouti paca), 5 agoutis (Dasyprocta leporina), 5 rock cavies (Kerodon rupestris), and 3 guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) in different stages of pregnancy (early, middle and near term). The samples were collected from multiple mothers. The guinea pig pregnancy age estimation was performed based in [27, 28]. The animals were submitted to vaginal cytology to detect the onset of pregnancy, and ultrasound examination to monitor gestational development. The placentas were recovered after specific days of pregnancy (Table 1) and the euthanasia was carry out by ketamine (300 mg/kg) and xylazine (30 mg/kg) overdoses by intraperitonial administration. Samples were obtained from the Center for Experimental Breeding of Capybara, at São Paulo State University, Araçatuba-SP; Center for Experimental Breeding of Paca, at São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal-SP; Center for Experimental Breeding of Agouti, at Federal University of Piaui, Teresina-PI; and Center for the Breeding of Wild Animals, at Federal Rural do Semi-Árido University, Mossoró-RN, Brazil.

Table 1 Summary of species and the different techniques utilized on the tissue samples collected
Full size table

Material for data analysis was collected following primary fixation with 4 % paraformaldehyde injected in situ via the maternal and fetal systems for further analysis and samples preservation. (Table 1). Gross aspects of the placentae were photographed, and schematic diagrams were drawn for documentation.

Latex injections

As a further aid to understanding vessel distribution, some placentae in early/middle gestation were injected with coloured latex (Neoprene 650, DuPont, Brazil; Latex Stain, Suvinil, Glassurit do Brazil S/A, São Bernardo do Campo, S.P., Brazil). Different colours were injected in a uterine vein, a uterine artery, an umbilical artery and the umbilical vein. The placentae were then immersion fixed in 10 % formalin, dissected and analyzed.

Microscopic anatomy

Preparations of histological sections for light microscopy were performed at the University of São Paulo’s School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science. Fragments of the placentas collected at different stages of gestation were fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde solution. After fixation the material was washed in phosphate–buffered saline (PBS), followed by dehydration in a series of increasing concentrations of ethanol (from 70 to 100 %), followed by diaphanization in xylol and paraffin embedding (Histosec) [29]. Paraffin blocks were sectioned at 5 μm in an automatic microtome (Leica, RM2165, Germany). Sections were left to adhere overnight to glass slides in an incubator at 40 °C. After being deparaffinized, the sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, as well as toluidine blue using routine methods.

Immunohistochemistry (IM)

Tissues collected for immunohistochemistry were immersion fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde in 70 mM phosphate buffer for 48 h, and then washed in cold PBS for 72 h. The samples were embedded in paraffin, sectioned to 5 μm in a microtome (Leica RM2265) and transferred to silanized slides (Sigma, # p8920). The sections were rehydrated and washed in citrate buffer (1.83 mM citric acid hydrate and 8.9 mM tribasic sodium citrate, pH 6.0) for antigen recovery. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3 % hydrogen peroxide diluted in distilled water for 30 min in a darkroom. Tissue sections were blocked with 2 % bovine serum albumin (BSA) diluted in PBS for 30 min. Primary antibodies: cytokeratin (catalogue number RGE53, Novus, 1:100), vimentin (GTX35160, GeneTex, 1:100), 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17β-HSD, abcam, catalogue number ab97971, 1:100), 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD, Invitrogen, catalogue number FDO66Q 1:100), and aromatase cytochrome P450 (aromatase, Invitrogen, catalogue number PA1-21398 1:100) were incubated overnight in a dark, humid chamber at 4 °C. The reaction was revealed using Dako Advance HRP (Dako, catalogue number K6068) and stained with DAB (Dako, catalogue number K3468) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. Between each step prior to antibody incubation, slides were rinsed in PBS containing 0.2 % BSA. Negative controls included no primary antiserum.

Slides were then mounted, viewed, and photographed on the Nikon Eclipse 80I microscope.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

To study the microvasculature, term placentae were injected with Mercox™ CL-2R resin (Okenshoji Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) [30]. The procedures were similar to those applied by others to a wide range of placental types [31, 32]. A maternal and/or fetal vessel was cannulated and the resin injected under gentle pressure. Tissues were digested by immersion of the preparation in several changes of 20 % NaOH solution at 50–60 °C. The casts were rinsed thoroughly in distilled water, dried in an oven at 37 °C, and stored in 20 % gelatin at 4 °C. For scanning electron microscopy, pieces of the casts were rinsed in distilled water to remove the gelatin, dried, and mounted on stubs with conductive carbon cement (Neubauer, Münster, Germany). They were then coated with gold using a sputter coater (Model K550, Emitech Products Inc., Houston TX, USA) and examined in a scanning electron microscope (Model 435 VP, Leo Electron Microscopy Ltd, Cambridge, UK).

Tissue steroid concentrations

Fragments of guinea pig placental tissue were collected at different stages of gestation (middle and late). Samples of subplacenta and labyrinthine zones were frozen at -20 °C for hormonal analysis. Steroid hormone concentration were measured using enzyme-immunoassays (EIA), previously validated by [33]. Steroid hormones were detected using specific primary antisera (estradiol, E2: C6E91; testosterone, T: R156 and progesterone, P4: C914) developed in the Department of Animal Physiology (UCM, Spain) and the Clinical Endocrinology Laboratory (University of California, Davis).

Results

Morphology and immuno-histochemistry

The gross morphology and microvascular arrangements of the subplacenta of these hystricomorph rodents were observed during pregnancy (Fig. 1A-D). The subplacentas in pacas appeared to regress in size from the middle of pregnancy to full term (Fig. 1C) and the subplacenta of the rock cavy was entirely absent by full term (Fig. 1DII). However, a major gross vasculature structure was formed by maternal veins (Fig. 1DII).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Gross morphology and microvascular architecture of the hystricomorph subplacenta. AI – AIII Capybara (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris) around 90–140 days of gestation. AI Sagittal section through the placenta showing the relationship among the chorioallantoic placenta (P), the subplacenta (Sp) and the basal deciduous (Bd) and the mesometrial side (Mes); AII Schematic drawing illustrating the relationship between the fetus (F), umbilical cord (Uc), yolk sac (Ys), Sp and Bd, and anti-mesometrial (Ant) of the uterus; AIII Corrosion model of the capybara which the different types of microvascularization of the placental lobes (PL) and Sp are observed. Placental vessels were injected with methacrylate and subjected to the corroding process. The relationship between Sp microvessels and larger vessels is verified (arrow), which possibly carry products produced by the subplacenta during this gestation phase - PP (placental peduncle) FU (umbilical funiculum). B Rock cavy (Kerodon rupestris) around 76 days: Placenta injected with methacrylate submitted to corrosion showing the central vessels (CV) and peripheral vessels (PV) in relation to the chorioallantoic placenta (P) and Sp. C Paca (Agouti paca) around 45–70 days: In C, the paca placenta injected with latex, the maternal vein injected with green, maternal artery with white, fetal vein with yellow and fetal artery with red. Note, the Sp appeared to have regressed in size at term compared with mid-gestation. DI – DII Agouti (Dasyprocta leporine) around 35–50 days: In DI, model of microvascularization of the agouti subplacenta, showing the central vessels injected in blue latex and the subplacenta in white latex. DII Showing the P and Sp and also the umbilical cord (Uc)

Full size image

Fetal and maternal blood vessels were prominent in the labyrinth layer and near the junctional zone of the capybara subplacenta (Fig. 2A). Giant cytotrophoblast cells were interspersed with syncytotroblast cells, which were in turn surrounded by vessels (Fig. 2AII). The giant cells of the cytotrophoblastic region showed a positive reaction to cytokeratin, however there was no immuno-staining in the fetal mesenchyme (Fig. 2BI − II). There was positive actin labeling in the cells of the muscle layer of the fetal vessels, but no evidence of actin immuno-staining in the syncytotrophlast region (Fig. 2CI − II). Vimentin-positive labeling was observed on vessel walls and giant cells (Fig. 2DI − II).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Capybara subplacenta (H. hydrochaeris) around 90–140 days of gestation. AI Section through the subplacenta showing the junctional zone (Jz) with fetal (arrow) and maternal (*) vessels in the labyrinth layer. AII Subplacenta showing the cytotrophoblast (Ct, arrow) interspersed by the cells of the syncytiotrophoblast (*St) surrounded by vessels (vs.). BI Subplacenta capybara cytokeratin 20X. Observe a positive reaction present in giant trophoblastic cells in the cytotrophoblast region (arrow) and negative reaction in the fetal mesenchyme. BII Subplacenta capybara cytokeratin 60X. Observe a positive reaction present in giant trophoblastic cells in the cytotrophoblast region (arrow) and negative reaction in the fetal mesenchyme (Mf). CI Subplacenta capybara actin 20X. CII Subplacenta capybara actin 60X. Positive marking on the muscular layer of the wall of fetal vessels (Fv) of Capybara Subplacenta (arrow) and cytotrophoblast (Ct-asterisk) cells and negative reaction in the region of the syncytiotrophoblast (St). DI Subplacenta capybara vimentin 20X - Observe the deciduous region (Dc) of the placenta of the capybara and junctional zone (Jz). DII Subplacenta capybara vimentin 60X - Observe positive marking for vimentin in the wall of vessels (arrow) and giant cells (asterisks) surrounded by cytotrophoblast (Ct) cells around the vessels, interspersed by the syncytiotrophoblast (St) region of the Capybara placenta

Full size image

In guinea pig placentae, there was positive immuno-reactivity consistent with steroidogenesis, mainly in the region of chorionic villi and, in the labyrinth region, only in the blood vessel region. Among the enzymes tested, 17β-HSD expression was especially evident in the trophoblastic cells of the villi (Fig. 3A, AI). Evidence of expression of 3β-HSD was also evident in the same region but was not as extensive expression (Fig. 3B, BI). The expression of aromatase (P450) was positive around the peripheral membrane protein of the labyrinth region (Fig. 3C, CI). No labeling was observed in the absence of the primary antisera, the negative controls (Fig. 3D, DI), in any of the sections.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Immunohistochemistry (IM) from guinea pig (C. porcellus) subplacenta (early gestation). In A, AIand B, BI, positive labeling of 17β-HSD and 3β-HSD respectively in the villi (arrows) and in the labyrinth region (asterisks). In C, CI positive expression of aromatase (P450). In D, DI, no labeling was observed in the negative control

Full size image

Microvascular arrangements

Vascular molds examined by the scanning electron microscopy technique demonstrated evidence of larger branches supplying the subplacenta. The division of these larger branches allows the branching of smaller vessels, which become tortuous with sinus dilations and constrictions in the vessel lumen as they course through the tissue (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images of Capybara (H. hydrochaeris) subplacenta vascular molds around 90–140 days (A-AIII) and Agouti (D. leporine) around 35–50 days (B-BIII). In mid to late gestation, the subplacenta is supplied exclusively by fetal vessels. A large branch of the umbilical artery follows the central band of fetal mesenchyme to the base of the main placenta and then large central vessel (CV) insert to supply the subplacenta. The subplacental vessels pursue a tortuous course forming a vascular network (VN) with sinusoidal dilatations and constrictions (full arrow) in both species at different stages of pregnancy, which demonstrates that the vascular supply remains for the transportation of the products necessary for organ development

Full size image

Ultra-structure

In capybara the nuclei of the cytotrophoblast cells were large in relation to the amount of cytoplasm and nucleoli were prominent (Fig. 5). The basal membrane of the cytotrophoblast layer was seen to be in contact with the connective tissue lamellae and often close to the fetal vessels. The syncytiotrophoblast enclosed many lacunae into which microvilli projected from the plasma membrane and, as gestation advanced, these lacunae formed an extensive inter-connected system.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of Subplacenta of the Paca (a-d). Observe the presence of cytotrophoblast (Ct) giant cells interspersed with the syncytiotrophoblast (St), basal lamina (arrow) and intercellular spaces (double arrow) are present

Full size image

Tissue steroid content

To verify the capacity for hormonal production by the subplacenta, samples of guinea pig subplacenta were analyzed for progesterone, testosterone and estradiol content and compared with the labyrinth region. In general, for all steroids, samples from mid-gestation had higher steroid concentrations when compared to samples collected from late gestation. In addition, the subplacenta region showed higher hormone levels than labyrinthine samples (Table 2).

Table 2 Median concentrations (ng/mg of tissue) of progesterone, testosterone and estradiol extracted and measured in 3 differentes samples from guinea pig labyrinth and subplacenta tissue samples
Full size table

Discussion

The subplacenta, as a structure found only on hystricomorph rodents, lagomorphs, and some primates, has attracted interest, especially in terms of comparative morphology. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have yet established an endocrine function for the subplacenta during conceptus development. The results of early studies investigating the potential for progesterone synthesis by the guinea pig placenta indicated that the spongy trophoblast was a likely source [34, 35]. However, these investigators did not examine the subplacenta. To explore the potential for endocrine function, we investigated the comparative morphology of the subplacenta of several Hystricomorph rodents, with a particular focus on cell structures typical of secretory activities, as well as the presence of steroid hormones and enzymes involved in their synthesis.

The subplacenta has been described in several species among the Hystricomorph rodents [1, 14, 15, 24, 25, 36,37,38,39,40]. In these species, the development of subplacenta is marked by an increase in the thickness of the cytotrophoblast lamellae forming the floor of the central excavation. This occurs during the early development of the viscacha (Lagostomus maximus) subplacenta [41] and was observed at later stages in the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) and coypu (Myocastor coypus) [42]. All caviomorph rodents exhibit a subplacenta located deep within the disc of the main placenta [43], which appears at the beginning of pregnancy and regresses during the later stages of development. Certain aspects related to the vascularization of the subplacenta remain to be defined. In nutria (Myocastor coypus) [42], the majority of maternal arteries are diverted from the subplacenta. Some of these arteries were observed to traverse the lobes of the subplacenta, but most were located outside of the subplacental area and thus between the adjacent lobes of the chorioallantoic placenta toward the central zone of each lobe. However, previous studies of rodent placentation [23, 43, 44] have provided scant evidence of the function of the subplacenta, suggesting only that it is a region contributing to cytotrophoblast growth and possible endocrine secretion.

Prior indirect evidence supports a possible endocrine role for the subplacenta. Recent work resulted in the creation of a library of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the subplacenta of the beaver (Castor fiber) carrying twin versus triplet fetuses. The transcripts identified were consistent with functions related to cellular processes, biological regulation, response to stimuli and metabolism but, compared to other parts of the placenta or even compared to other species, there appeared to be little difference in functional terms [45]. The subplacenta is known to be responsive to the amount of oxygen available, and its area is increased when oxygen is restricted [46]. The fact that we have observed vesicles and secretory granules in addition to microvilli in the subplacenta cells of the paca and the guinea pig also suggests that there may be local effects of secreted products within the placenta itself, suggestive of paracrine effects.

In addition to sub-cellular specializations, the subplacenta of several species examined here (capybara, paca, agouti and rock cavy) presents a distinct pattern of vascularization, typical of endocrinal glands. Different aspects including the central vasculature of the labyrinth and junctional zones, and subplacental vasculature, were comparable with small capillaries, around larger vessels, where it was possible to identify sinusal dilatations and anastomotic channels, like those described previously [1]. Furthermore, others reported that the intercellular space was marked by the presence of microvilli as evidence of communication between the syncytium and the cytotrophoblast that make up the subplacenta in the cane rat [47]. While their content remains unknown, there is a temporal concordance between the appearance of these secretory granules in the subplacenta and the increase in progesterone binding globulins during gestation. In addition, the peroxisomes found in the subplacenta are consistent with lipid metabolism. These organelles contain enzymes related to the beta-oxidation of fatty acids. Peroxisomes breakdown fatty acids into acetyl-CoA, which supports the biosynthesis of cholesterol, the ultimate precursor of all steroid hormones [48]. Burgess and Tam [34] reported that lipid droplets which were first apparent in the spongy zone and other areas of the placenta after day 25 of gestation were consistent with steroidogenic activity in these cells. Mitochondria, especially those derived from syncytiotrophoblast, are known to have the capacity to initiate steroid hormone synthesis, being the sub-cellular site of expression of cytochrome P450 cholesterol side chain cleavage [49, 50].

More direct evidence for endocrine function was provided by the detection of steroid hormones in subplacental tissue and the expression of steroidogenic enzymes including 17β-HSD and 3β-HSD by immuno-histochemistry which is consistent with the synthesis of progesterone and of testosterone and estradiol. The catalytic activity of 17β-HSD is required for the reduction of DHEA to androstenediol, androstenedione to testosterone and estrone to estradiol. The presence of progesterone in subplacental tissue is also consistent with expression of 3β-HSD and the oxidation of pregnenolone and 17α-hydroxypregnenolone to progesterone and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone, respectively [51, 52]. The failure to detect aromatase labeling is consistent with the low amount of estradiol found in the tissues compared to progesterone and testosterone. This is also consistent with the low levels of expression of aromatase compared with cytochrome P450 17α-hydroxylase/1720-lyase in ovarian [53] and testicular tissues [54]. Finally, immunohistochemistry is not a very sensitive technique and low levels of enzyme activity together with poor cross-reactivity of antisera across species can present challenges.

Conclusions

The subplacenta does not differ greatly in terms of the structural aspects among the hystricomorphs investigated, and it is has potential for hormonal secretion during the early stages of pregnancy based on evidence consistent with steroidogenic enzyme activity.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available. If necessary, contact Maria Angelica Miglino (miglino@usp.br).

Abbreviations

PBS - phosphate:

Buffered saline

IM:

Immunohistochemistry

mM:

Millimolar

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

17β-HSD:

17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase

3β-HSD:

3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase

P450:

Aromatase cytochrome

SEM:

Scanning Electron Microscopy

EIA:

Enzyme-immunoassays

DHEA:

Dehydroepiandrosterone

References

  1. Bonatelli M, Carter AM, Fernandes Machado MR, De Oliveira MF, de Lima MC, Miglino MA. Placentation in the paca (Agouti paca L). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005;3:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-3-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Carter AM, Mess AM. Conservation of placentation during the tertiary radiation of mammals in South America. J Morphol. 2013;274:557–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20120.

  3. Stewart JR, Thompson MB. Evolution of placentation among squamate reptiles: Recent research and future directions. Com Biochem And Physiol Part A: Mol & Integr Physiol. 2000;127:411–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(00)00273-7.

  4. Stewart JR, Thompson MB. Evolutionary Transformations of the Fetal Membranes of Viviparous Reptiles: A Case Study of Two Lineages. J Exp Zool. 2003;299A:13–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.a.10288.

  5. Carter AM, Enders AC, Pijnenborg R. The role of invasive trophoblast in implantation and placentation of primates. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2015;370:20140070. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0070.

  6. Paavola LG, Furth EE, Delgado V, Boyd CO, Jacobs CC, Lei H, et al. Striking Changes in the Structure and Organization of Rat Fetal Membranes Precede Parturition1. Biol Reprod. 1995;53:321–38. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod53.2.321.

  7. Valdés G, Erices R, Chacón C, Corthorn J. Angiogenic, hyperpermeability and vasodilator network in utero-placental units along pregnancy in the guinea-pig (Cavia porcellus). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2008;6:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-6-13.

  8. Schuler G, Fürbass R, Klisch K. Placental contribution to the endocrinology of gestation and parturition. Anim Reprod. 2018;15(Suppl. 1):822–42. https://doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0015.

  9. Geisert RD, Conley AJ. Secretion and Metabolism of Steroids in Subprimate Mammals During Pregnancy. In: Endocrinology of Pregnancy. Totowa: Humana Press; 1998. p. 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1804-3_10.

  10. Oyen ML, Cook RF, Calvin SE. Mechanical failure of human fetal membrane tissues. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;15:651–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000030205.62668.90.

  11. Wolf E, Arnold GJ, Bauersachs S, Beier HM, Blum H, Einspanier R, et al. Embryo-maternal communication in bovine - Strategies for deciphering a complex cross-talk. Reprod Domest Anim. 2003;38:276–89. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00435.x.

  12. Stewart JR. Yolk sac placentation in reptiles: Structural innovation in a fundamental vertebrate fetal nutritional system. J Exp Zool. 1993;266:431–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402660509.

  13. Kot K, Kosik-Bogacka D, Łanocha-Arendarczyk N, Malinowski W, Szymański S, Mularczyk M, et al. Interactions between 14 elements in the human placenta, fetal membrane and umbilical cord. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091615.

  14. Bonatelli M, Machado MRF, Cruz C, Miglino MA. Análise morfológica da placenta da paca (Agouti paca, Linnaeus, 1766: Estudo ao microscópio de luz e à microscopia eletrônica de transmissão. Braz J Vet Res Ani Sci. 2001;38:224–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-95962001000500005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaufmann P, Davidoff M. The Guinea-Pig Placenta. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1977. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66618-6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Leiser R, Kaufmann P. Placental structure: In a comparative aspect. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1994;102:122–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hradecký P, Mossman HW. Vertebrate Fetal Membranes: Comparative Ontogeny and Morphology; Evolution; Phylogenetic significance; Basic Functions; Research Opportunities. J Zoo Anim Med. 1987;18(2/3):55. https://doi.org/10.2307/20460238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bezerra FVF, Favaron PO, Mess AM, Araújo Júnior HN, Oliveira GB, Pereira AF, et al. Subplacental development in Galea spixii. Pesqui Vet Bras. 2018;38:2175–82. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fadl S, Moshiri M, Fligner CL, Katz DS, Dighe M. Placental imaging: Normal appearance with review of pathologic findings1. Radiographics. 2017;37:979–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davies J, Dempsey EW, Amoroso EC. The subplacenta of the guinea-pig development, histology and histochemistry. J Anat. 1961;95 Pt 3:311-324.13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17105123. Accessed 7 Jan 2020.

  21. Rodrigues RF, Carter AM, Ambrosio CE, dos Santos TC, Miglino MA. The subplacenta of the red-rumped agouti (Dasyprocta leporina L). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. RB&E. 2006;4:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-4-31.

  22. J.S. RCM & P. Hystricomorph embryology. Symp Zool Soc London. 1974;34:333–60.

  23. Mess A. Development of the chorioallantoic placenta inOctodon degus—a model for growth processes in caviomorph rodents? J Exp Zool Part B Mol Dev Evol. 2007;308B:371–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Miglino MA, Carter AM, Ambrosio CE, Bonatelli M, De Oliveira MF, Dos Santos Ferraz RH, et al. Vascular Organization of the Hystricomorph Placenta: a Comparative Study in the Agouti, Capybara, Guinea Pig, Paca and Rock Cavy. Placenta. 2004;25:438–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2003.11.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oliveira MF, Carter AM, Bonatelli M, Ambrosio CE, Miglino MA. Placentation in the rock cavy, Kerodon rupestris (Wied). Placenta. 2006;27:87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2004.11.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Springer MS, Murphy WJ. Mammalian evolution and biomedicine: New views from phylogeny. Biol Rev. 2007;82:375–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00016.x.

  27. Santos J, Fonseca E, van Melis J, Miglino MA. Morphometric analysis of fetal development of Cavia porcellus (Linnaeus, 1758) by ultrasonography—Pilot study. Theriogenology. 2014;81:896–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.01.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schumann K, Guenther A, Göritz F, Jewgenow K. Characterization of fetal growth by repeated ultrasound measurements in the wild guinea pig (Cavia aperea). Theriogenology. 2014;82:490–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.05.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tolosa, Erasmo Magalhães Castro de - Rodrigues, Consuelo Junqueira - Behmer, Oswaldo Arruda - Freitas Neto A. Manual de Técnicas Para Histologia Normal e Patológica. Manole. 2003;219–33.

  30. Hodde KC, Nowell JA. SEM of micro-corrosion casts. Scanning Electron Microsc. 1980; Pt 2:89–106.

  31. Leiser R, Krebs C, Ebert B, Dantzer V. Placental vascular corrosion cast studies: A comparison between ruminants and humans. Microsc Res Tech. 1997;38:76–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19970701/15)38:1/2<76::AID-JEMT9>3.0.CO;2-S.

  32. Krebs C, Winther H, Dantzer V, Leiser R. Vascular interrelationships of near-term mink placenta: Light microscopy combined with scanning electron microscopy of corrosion casts. Microsc Res Tech. 1997;38:125–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19970701/15)38:1/2<125::AID-JEMT13>3.0.CO;2-R.

  33. Caceres S, Peña L, Silvan G, Illera MJ, Woodward WA, Reuben JM, et al. Steroid Tumor Environment in Male and Female Mice Model of Canine and Human Inflammatory Breast Cancer. BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8909878.

  34. Burgess SM, Tam WH. Ultrastructural changes in the guinea-pig placenta, with special reference to organelles associated with steroidogenesis. J Anat. 1978;126 Pt 2:319–27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/670066.

  35. Tam WH. Steroid synthesis in vitro by the placenta of the guinea pig, and progesterone concentrations in systemic and uterine plasma. J Endocrinol. 1977;73:483–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vasconcelos BG, Favaron PO, Miglino MA, Mess AM. Development and morphology of the inverted yolk sac in the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). Theriogenology. 2013;80:636–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.06.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Flamini MA, Barreto RSN, Matias GSS, Birbrair A, Harumi de Castro Sasahara T, Barbeito CG, et al. Key characteristics of the ovary and uterus for reproduction with particular reference to poly ovulation in the plains viscacha (Lagostomus maximus, chinchillidae). Theriogenology. 2020;142:184–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.09.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Oliveira MF, Mess A, Ambrósio CE, Dantas CAG, Favaron PO, Miglino MA. Chorioallantoic placentation in Galea spixii (Rodentia, Caviomorpha, Caviidae). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2008;6:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-6-39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Miglino MA, Franciolli ALR, de Oliveira MF, Ambrósio CE, Bonatelli M, Machado MRF, et al. Development of the Inverted Visceral Yolk Sac in Three Species of Caviids (Rodentia, Caviomorpha, Caviidae). Placenta. 2008;29:748–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2008.05.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Roberts CT, Sohlstrom A, Kind KL, Earl RA, Khong TY, Robinson JS, et al. Maternal food restriction reduces the exchange surface area and increases the barrier thickness of the placenta in the guinea-pig. Placenta. 2001;22:177–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Flamini MA, Portiansky EL, Favaron PO, Martins DS, Ambrósio CE, Mess AM, et al. Chorioallantoic and yolk sac placentation in the plains viscacha (Lagostomus maximus) - A caviomorph rodent with natural polyovulation. Placenta. 2011;32:963–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hillemann HH, Gaynor AI. The definitive architecture of the placentae of nutria,Myocastor coypus (Molina). Am J Anat. 1961;109:299–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001090306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mess A, Blackburn DG, Zeller U. Evolutionary transformations of fetal membranes and reproductive strategies. J Exp Zool. 2003;299A:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.a.10287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mess A. The subplacenta inOctodon degus andpetromus typicus—two hystricognath rodents without significant placental lobulation. J Exp Zool Part B Mol Dev Evol. 2007;308B:172–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lipka A, Majewska M, Panasiewicz G, Bieniek-Kobuszewska M, Szafranska B. Gene structure of the pregnancy-associated glycoprotein-like (PAG-L) in the Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber L.). Funct Integr Genomics. 2017;17:599–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Thompson LP, Pence L, Pinkas G, Song H, Telugu BP. Placental Hypoxia During Early Pregnancy Causes Maternal Hypertension and Placental Insufficiency in the Hypoxic Guinea Pig Model. Biol Reprod. 2016;95:128–8. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.116.142273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Oduor-Okelo D. An electron microscopic study of the chorioallantoic placenta and the subplacenta of the cane rat (Thryonomys swinderianus Temminck). Placenta. 5:433–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0143-4004(84)80024-7.

  48. Cerqueira NMFSA, Oliveira EF, Gesto DS, Santos-Martins D, Moreira C, Moorthy HN, et al. Cholesterol Biosynthesis: A Mechanistic Overview. Biochemistry. 2016;55:5483–506. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00342.

  49. Miller WL. Steroid hormone synthesis in mitochondria. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013;379:62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2013.04.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Martinez F, Olvera-Sanchez S, Esparza-Perusquia M, Gomez-Chang E, Flores-Herrera O. Multiple functions of syncytiotrophoblast mitochondria. Steroids. 2015;103:11–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Nguyen PTT, Lee RSF, Conley AJ, Sneyd J, Soboleva TK. Variation in 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity and in pregnenolone supply rate can paradoxically alter androstenedione synthesis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2012;128:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.10.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Prough RA, Clark BJ, Klinge CM. Novel mechanisms for DHEA action. J Mol Endocrinol. 2016;56:R139–55. https://doi.org/10.1530/JME-16-0013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Corbin CJ, Moran FM, Vidal JD, Ford JJ, Wise T, Mapes SM, et al. Biochemical assessment of limits to estrogen synthesis in porcine follicles. Biol Reprod. 2003;69:390–7. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.015578.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Moran FM, Ford JJ, Corbin CJ, Mapes SM, Njar VC, Brodie AM, et al. Regulation of microsomal P450, redox partner proteins, and steroidogenesis in the developing testes of the neonatal pig. Endocrinology. 2002;143:3361–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

To Maria Acelina Martins Carvalho, Franceliusa Delys de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo Ambrósio and Rosangela Felipe Rodrigues for support in collected samples and Antonio Chaves de Assis Neto for assigning the antibody aliquots of the study.

Funding

This work was supported by Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), and by The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grant number 2014/50844-3) providing financial assistance for sample collection, as well as for histological and data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ-USP), University of São Paulo- SP, Ave. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, São Paulo, 05508270, São Paulo, Brazil

    Maria Angelica Miglino, Gustavo de Sá Schiavo Matias, Nathia Nathaly Rigoglio, Jessica Borghesi & Taís Harumi de Castro Sasahara

  2. Department of Animal Physiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain

    Maria Josephina Illera del Portal, Juan Carlos Illera del Portal, Gema Silván Granado & Sara Cristina Caceres Ramos

  3. Department of Animal Science, Federal University of the Semi-Arid Region (UFERSA), Mossoro, Brazil

    Moacir Franco de Oliveira

  4. Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California UC-Davis, 3223 VM3B, Sacramento, California, USA

    Alan James Conley

Authors
  1. Maria Angelica Miglino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gustavo de Sá Schiavo Matias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nathia Nathaly Rigoglio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jessica Borghesi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Taís Harumi de Castro Sasahara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maria Josephina Illera del Portal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Juan Carlos Illera del Portal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gema Silván Granado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sara Cristina Caceres Ramos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Moacir Franco de Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Alan James Conley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MAM, GSSM, NNR, JB and THCS: experimental conduction / MFO: animal sample collection / MAM, MJIP, JCIP and AJC: project idealization / MAM, GSSM, NNR, JB and AJC: writing / MJIP, JCIP, GSG and SCCR: hormonal analysis / All authors: data interpretation / MAM: funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Angelica Miglino.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The project was conducted under rules of the Bioethics Commission of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil and by the Brazilian Institute of the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA) (Protocols Nr.77/2002; 927/2006). All Animal Ethics procedures are in accordance with BMC Zoology criteria.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miglino, M.A., de Sá Schiavo Matias, G., Rigoglio, N.N. et al. The comparative aspects of hystricomorph subplacenta: potential endocrine organ. BMC Zool 6, 16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-021-00074-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-021-00074-w

Keywords

BMC Zoology

ISSN: 2056-3132

Contact us