Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Zoology

Open Access

High-resolution monitoring from birth to sexual maturity of a male reef manta ray, Mobula alfredi, held in captivity for 7 years: changes in external morphology, behavior, and steroid hormones levels

BMC ZoologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted20172:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-017-0023-0

Received: 12 May 2017

Accepted: 28 September 2017

Published: 17 October 2017

Abstract

Background

In this study, we report the first case of a male reef manta ray, Mobula alfredi, becoming sexually mature in captivity and present its reproductive characteristics.

Methods

We investigated changes in external morphology, behavior, and levels of steroid hormones in a male M. alfredi during its sexual maturation process.

Results

At 2 years and 6 months of age, the male exceeded 300 cm in disc width. Then, at around 3 years of age, the male started to chase a female in the tank and exhibited androgen levels similar to that of another matured male, indicating that the study specimen had begun sexual maturation endocrinologically. Its first copulation event was observed at 5 years and 4 months and appeared behaviorally similar to field observations. Seven months after copulation, we performed a biopsy to collect its semen, including any motile sperm.

Conclusion

Taken together, these results indicate that the captive male M. alfredi individual shows signs of sexual maturation (size of disc width, testosterone levels, reproductive behavior) already with the age of 2.5 to 3 years. As a first copulation was observed with 5 years 4 months of age and the presence of sperm were confirmed at the age of 5 years 11 months of age, the studied animal reached its full sexual maturity at the latest at the age of around 5 years.

Keywords

Reef manta ray Mobula Alfredi MaleSexual maturationIn-captivityMating behaviorsSex steroid hormones

Background

Manta rays comprise two species that occur in tropical, sub-tropical, and temperate waters around the world. As fully-grown adults, they are among the largest ray species. Due to their tendency to aggregate predictably in relatively shallow waters around islands and along coastlines, they have become an attraction for recreational divers in many countries. Manta ray-based ecotourism potential can be important for coastal communities, particularly in developing countries, where it can generate great economic benefits [1, 2].

Until recently, the genus Manta was considered mono-specific, but was redescribed [3] in 2009 as comprising the reef manta ray, Manta alfredi (Krefft 1868) and the giant manta ray M. birostris (Walbaum 1792). In a recent study, the mitochondrial genome analysis showed that both Manta species are nested within the other Mobula species and sister to M. mobular [4]; the authors noted that Manta is an invalid generic name. Therefore, in the present paper, the genus “Mobula” was adopted. Both species were listed as globally vulnerable on the IUCN Red List [5, 6].

Previous reports have provided some ecological information about manta ray species, such as distribution, movement patterns, courtship, mating behavior, gestation period, and reproductive periodicity [79]. However, there is little information on their reproductive biology. Observations of captive specimens in aquariums enable us to obtain accurate information of the same individual over time. At the Okinawa Churaumi Aquarium (OCA), M. alfredi individuals thrive since 1988; much information on the biology of this species has been generated in this aquarium. For example, the OCA recorded the first captive reproduction of a M. alfredi [10, 11]. On June 8, 2006, a male mated with a female and on June 16, 2007, the female gave birth to a female pup (193 cm disc width and 68.5 kg body weight). On June 17, 2008, the same pair gave birth to a male pup that was used in the present study. In addition, the copulating behavior was similar to that reported for Ogasawara wild mantas [12] and the duration of clasper insertion into the cloaca was approximately 11 to 18 s. Based on the observation, the authors concluded that the duration from copulation to parturition was approximately 1 year, which were consistent with field observations [7]. On the other hand, it is thought that M. alfredi usually takes a resting interval of at least 1 year between pregnancies [7]. The captive female in the OCA, however, mated with a male in the tank immediately after giving birth; the female manta ray became pregnant again and gave birth the next year [10]. This suggests that breaks in pregnancy in the wild are not due to the physical conditions, however, only environmental cues may be essential. Additionally, aspects of the embryonic respiratory system of M. alfredi were revealed by an ultrasonographic experiment on the pregnant individual [13]. This study provides the first direct evidence of the respiratory behavior of a M. alfredi embryo by demonstrating that the embryo acquires oxygen from the uterine fluid using gill ventilation. Thus, observations on M. alfredi in captivity can not only strengthen previous studies but also provide new biological information.

To achieve efficient captive breeding of M. alfredi in other facilities, it is essential to accumulate more information on its reproductive ecology and physiology. However, only few studies on these aspects exist because of the difficulty in closely following M. alfredi over its complete life-span and the high effort involved. Here, we confirm that a male born in the OCA reached sexual maturity in captivity. Moreover, we provide behavioral and physiological information on its captive reproduction obtained from detailed and continuous time series observations.

Methods

An observed individual and rearing conditions

A male (identification number: No10–2) was born in the “Kuroshio” tank (a 10 m deep, rectangular aquarium (35 × 27 m)) of the OCA on June 17, 2008, and was observed continuously (Fig. 1a). After birth, the neonate was immediately moved to the sea pen (diameter: 30 m, depth: 12–15 m) and kept there for approximately 10 months to naturalize feeding and allow the development of swimming ability without any influence from other individuals. The pup was then moved to the main tank again. Our study period ended at the end of November 2015 as the animal has been moved and been kept solo since then. The circulation rate of water in the tank was 16 turnovers per day (recycled seawater 12 turnovers and fresh seawater 4 turnovers) and water temperature was not under thermal control. The daily feed dosage was 0.5–0.8% of its body weight. The body mass was calculated using the allometry equation (Body weight (kg) = 0.000013563* disc width (cm) 2.889 (R2 = 0.973)) that was derived from actual measurement values of 18 M. alfredi individuals (Matsumoto et al., personal communication). Feeding was performed twice a day, and the feed included Euphausia superba, E. pacifica, Sergestes lucens, and Engraulis japonicus.
Fig. 1

Photograph of No10–2 soon after his birth and a chart of his growth of disc width (DW). a No10–2 swimming in the ocean sea pen. b Actual DW measurements were taken at birth and at 10 months of age. After that, estimated DW values were calculated by interorbital distance. mo; months

Estimation of disc width

Disc width (DW) of specimen No10–2 was measured twice: at his birth (182 cm) and at 10 months of age (261 cm). Thereafter, its outer interorbital distance (IOD) was measured in June and/or December of each year. Estimated DW was calculated from IOD using the growth equation (LogDW (cm) = 0.84841*LogIOD (cm) + 0.88452, R2 = 0.94) that derived from actual measurement values of 18 M. alfredi individuals (Matsumoto et al., personal communication).

Behavior observation and test for stiffness of claspers

During the day, aquarium staff visually monitored the individual but not continuously. When the individual exhibited specific behaviors, we recorded the behaviors through photographs and/or videos from inside and/or outside the tank. To confirm the claspers status, we hand-tested them for stiffness at the birth (June 2008), 5 year and 4 months (Oct 2013) and 5 years 11 months of age (May 2014) while No10–2 swam.

Semen collection

To confirm whether or not the individual produced mature sperm, we obtained semen from No10–2 via a biopsy while swam (Additional file 1: Movie S1). At 5 years and 11 months of age (on May 30, 2014), a plastic tube (All Silicone Foley Balloon Catheters, Product No. 001027 0120, Create Medic Co., Ltd., Kanagawa) connected with syringes (5 ml for ballooning, 50 ml for collecting semen, Terumo Corporation, Tokyo) was slipped into his clasper and semen was obtained. The semen was observed under light microscopy and video-recorded; it was also observed under a light microscope after Giemsa staining. We estimated that the specimen did not suffer severe stress due to the biopsy because feed consumption was unaffected after the semen collection.

Additional file 1:

Movie S1. Semen collection. (MOV 9686 kb)

Blood collection and measurement of plasma steroid hormones levels

No10–2 had received husbandry training since it was approximately 1 year old, which enabled us to collect blood samples regularly after 3 years and 3 months of age, from its left or right pectoral fin vein or artery, using a syringe (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo) with a 20 gauge needle (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo) while No10–2 swam. The time of blood collection was fixed in the morning. However, during certain months, we could not collect blood samples. The collected blood was placed into a heparinized tube and plasma was obtained by centrifugation (1400×g for 20 min. at room temperature). Obtained plasma was stored at −30 °C until analysis. To compare mature and immature male characteristics, the preserved plasma obtained from other males (i.e., No6 mature, 318-cm DW; No26 immature, 215-cm DW) was also analyzed. Both male individuals were caught from the wild. No6 was regarded as sexually mature because previous observations showed that No6 mated with a female in the OCA [10]. In addition, No26 was regarded as immature based on the previous report that DW at sexual maturity in wild was 270–300 cm [8].

Extraction of plasma steroid was performed according to a previous procedure [14]. Briefly, plasma steroids were extracted three times using 2.5 mL diethyl ether. The extracts were evaporated and the residue was reconstituted with 2 times its volume of assay buffer (0.05 M borate buffer, pH 7.8, containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin). Estradiol 17 beta (E2), testosterone (T), and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) were determined by ELISA, following the methods of Asahina et al. (1995) [15]. Additionally, progesterone (P4) was determined using the Progesterone ELISA kit (Item No. 582601, Cayman Chemical Company, MI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We made it a top priority to measure testosterone levels based on the volume of preserved plasma sample. Samples and standards were applied in duplicate to each plate. Based on the information from the supplier (Cosmo Bio Co., Ltd., Tokyo), the major cross-reaction of the E2 antibody for estrone was 0.8%, and 0.5% for estriol. The cross-reaction of the T antibody for DHT and 11-ketotestosterone (11KT) was 7.0% and 0%, respectively; the cross-reaction of DHT antibody for T and 11KT was 48% and 0%, respectively; the cross reaction of the P4 antibody for E2 and T was 7.2% and <0.05%, respectively.

Results

Increase in disc width and elongation of claspers

DW at birth of the individual was 182 cm. Growth data of DW are shown in Fig. 1b: DW increased from the birth to 5 years and 6 months of age, after which it remained at ca. 345 cm until the end of the study. At birth, its claspers were shorter than its pelvic fins (Fig. 2a). The organ elongated during development. At an examination at 5 years and 4 months of age, its length exceeded the pelvic fins already (Fig. 2b). However, we could not confirm when exactly the clasper started to increase in size and exceeded the pelvic fins during our observation period. Furthermore its stiffness at this examination was similar to that of the mature individual No6.
Fig. 2

Morphological changes in claspers. a Claspers at 4 months old (in October 2008). b Claspers exceeded the distal end of the pelvic fins at 5 years and 4 months of age (in October 2013). Arrowheads indicate claspers; arrows indicate pelvic fin

Appearance of reproductive behavior

At 3 years of age (in June 2011; * in Fig. 5), we observed that No10–2 slowly chased females; this behavior is known as a “mating train” (Additional file 2: Movie S2). This behavior was observed several times over several days. At 5 years and 4 months of age (on October 6, 2013; ** in Fig. 5), No10–2 copulated with a female for the first time (Fig. 3; Additional file 3: Movie S3). The male chased the female actively (Fig. 3a), which attempted to position immediately over the dorsal surface of the female and cause the female to rear up, after then bit the tip of the female left pectoral fin, and then inserted its clasper into the female cloaca (Fig. 3b). During copulation, both sank to the bottom of the tank; once they reached the bottom, they swam away separately. The duration from biting the female left pectoral fin to the separation was 40–50 s. After the copulation, vigorous chasing of No10–2 continued for several days and then quieted. Two months after copulation, we confirmed that the female was not pregnant, using ultrasonographic imaging. At 5 years and 11 months of age (May 2014; *** in Fig. 5), the male chased the female actively for several days, but no mating was observed. When the individual reached 6 years and 11 months (May 2015; *** in Fig. 5), we observed active chasing without copulation for several days. And then, we again observed active chasing at 7 years and 2 months of age (August 2015) for a couple of weeks, followed by copulation at 7 years and 3 months of age (on September 2, 2015; ** in Fig. 5). Accordingly, we confirmed that the female was not pregnant.
Fig. 3

Snapshots of mating behaviors in No10–2. a Active chasing behavior observed in October 2013. b Copulation observed in October 2013

Additional file 2:

Movie S2. Mating train. The top position is a female, the second is No10–2, and the third is another matured male. (MOV 15007 kb)

Additional file 3:

Movie S3. First-time copulation of No10–2 recorded on October 6, 2013. (MOV 34609 kb)

Production of motile spermatozoa

At 5 years and 11 months of age, mobility of spermatozoa in the semen collected from No10–2 was confirmed (Fig. 4a, b; Additional file 4: Movie S4). The sperm had a typical chondrichthian spiral head structure and rotated along the long axis (Fig. 4c).
Fig. 4

Semen from No10–2. a Plastic tube inserted into the clasper. b Collected semen. c Giemsa-stained sperm. Scale bars = 20 μm

Additional file 4:

Movie S4. Motile sperm included in the semen. (MOV 760 kb)

Changes in the levels of steroid hormones

Changes in the concentrations of steroid hormones of No10–2 are shown in Fig. 5 and Additional file 5: Table S1. Androgens levels were stable from 3 years of age. Irregular peaks of testosterone levels were detected from age 6 onwards. Variation in dihydrotestosterone showed a pattern similar to that of testosterone. Estrogen showed basal level and did not range dramatically throughout the observation period. Progesterone level increased at 6 years of age, from February to June, then decreased. At 3 years of age, androgen levels of the studied specimen was within the range of androgen levels of the matured male (No6; Fig. 6, Additional file 6: Table S2), which in turn was approximately 25–135 times higher than that of the immature male (No26; Fig. 6, Additional file 7: Table S3). Immediately prior to the chasing behaviors seen in May and August 2015, increases in testosterone levels were observed, especially for T levels in August that exceeded the upper threshold of the standard curve (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Changes in the plasma steroid hormones levels in No10–2 during the monitoring period. Changes in testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, 17ß-estradiol, progesterone, and monthly-averaged water temperatures in the tank. “DL” means off-scale low; “Over” indicates that the parameter was not measurable using the scale applied; * indicate the timing that No10–2 start to join the mating train; ** indicates chasing period with observed copulation; *** indicate appearance time of the active chasing behavior without copulation

Fig. 6

Comparison of its testosterone levels with those of different males. Levels of testosterone during 2011 in No10–2 (when approximately 3 years of age), in the mature No6, and in the immature No 26. Aug, August; Dec, December; Feb, February; Jan, January; Jun, June; Mar, March; Nov, November; Oct, October; Sep, September

Discussion

It has been previously reported that the age and DW at maturity in males was 3–6 years and 270–300 cm, respectively [8, 16]. Our observations of reproductive age in captivity are consistent with these field observations [8]. On the other hand, regarding DW, when No10–2 was only 2 years and 6 months old — that is, 6 months younger the minimum age for maturity than in a wild male — No10–2 already had exceeded the DW size at maturity (300 cm) of wild males. However, although the testosterone level is already higher than in an immature animal, the animal did not show chasing or mating behavior at this time. These results suggest that age might be a more important factor than attaining sexual maturity size in M. alfredi. In contrast, it has been reported that the timing of pubertal development in male bonnethead sharks, Sphyrna tiburo, may be more associated with its size than its age [17]. On the basis of these disparities, it is likely that the limiting factor of sexual maturation in elasmobranchs depends on the particular species and/or its environment. Moreover, the results of the present study implied that that growth rates and possibly size at maturity might be quite plastic in M. alfredi, and very dependent on the individual’s experience.

Clasper length and calcification are often-used criteria of male sexual maturity in elasmobranchs, in that a rapid increase in clasper length marks the onset of sexual maturity [18]. Under these criteria, the length of the claspers of No10–2 had already exceeded that of the pelvic fins, and its stiffness at 5 years and 4 months of age was similar to that of matured No6, this suggested that No10–2 had completed sexual maturation by this age. However, we could not confirm when exactly the clasper started to increase in size and exceeded the pelvic fins during our observation period. Therefore, in order to determine whether the timing of clasper elongation is consistent with other characteristics of sexual maturation (especially mating behavior and/or steroid hormone levels), further detailed observations are needed if a new male is born.

In this study, we observed that a M. alfredi born in captivity could exhibit mating behavior in the tank. Mating behavior of the giant manta ray, M. birostris, was observed in detail at Ogasawara Islands, Japan [12]; in this study, the serial mating behavior was classified into five steps: chasing, biting, copulating, post-copulating, and separating. In the case of M. alfredi, mating behavior observed in Mozambique also followed these five steps [7]. The present observations revealed that the captive male manta ray is able to engage in serial mating behavior typical of that seen in the field.

The first copulation of No10–2 was observed at 5 years and 4 months of age (in October 2013), a second one at 7 years and 3 months of age (in September 2015). Because this behavior was observed during visual monitoring in the day, we were unable to eliminate the possibility that any other occasion may have been overlooked. However, in here, we discussed based on the copulations we observed actually. Most of the copulations in M. alfredi at the OCA were observed from May to July, indicating that their breading season in captivity lasted for several months [10]. However, copulation in 2015 occurred in September, which differed from that in the past. In Hawaii and the Maldives, M. alfredi exhibits two mating seasons in a given year [7, 19]. For Hawaii, it was suggested that females that are unsuccessful in getting pregnant during the first mating season may mate again during the second season [19]. In the present study, copulation occurred in September, which was an unusual time at the OCA, presumably because of the failure to copulate successfully during the ordinary breeding season (May to July).

The results of the present study showed the changes in steroid hormones over time in a male M. alfredi born in captivity. In particular, it is reported that the increase in androgens could be associated with puberty in male elasmobranch. In male bonnethead sharks, S. tiburo, androgen increased during puberty [17]. Additionally, in a male whale shark kept for over 20 years in the OCA, its testosterone levels definitely increased during the dramatic extension of his claspers (Matsumoto et al., personal communication), indicating that testosterone levels increased during sexual maturation in male whale sharks as well. On the other hand, in the present study, the androgen level of No10–2 did not exhibit such an upward trend during monitoring. Furthermore, testosterone levels in another mature male (No6) were the same range as those of No10–2 at 3 years of age (in 2011), whereas testosterone levels in the immature male (No26) were extremely lower than those in No10–2. On the basis of these facts, it is highly likely that No10–2 had already started the sexual maturation process endocrinologically before 3 years of age.

Conclusion

Although born in captivity, a male M. alfredi reached sexual maturity at the age of 5 years. This fact raises the possibility of complete breeding of M. alfredi in captivity. Importantly, the present study is the first to provide endocrinological data on a male M. alfredi in captivity. Since there have been limited published reports about captive breeding or copulation of M. alfredi, it is important that the present information obtained at the OCA be shared to achieve breeding of M. alfredi at other institutions. We hope to contribute to a better understanding of the reproductive biology of M. alfredi through long-term observations in captivity.

Abbreviations

DHT: 

Dihydrotestosterone

DW: 

Disc width

E2: 

Estradiol 17 beta

IOD: 

Interorbital distance

P4: 

Progesterone

T: 

Testosterone

The OCA: 

Okinawa Churaumi Aquarium

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all of the Okinawa Churaumi Aquarium staff for their kind assistance.

Fundings

This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 16 K21717 (RN) and 25,292,128 (MN).

Availability of data and materials

Measurement value of steroid hormones supporting the conclusions of this article is included within an Additional file 5.

Authors’ contributions

RN, MN and KS conceived of the study, and participated in its design, and wrote the manuscript. RN performed steroid hormones assay. KM, RM, NY, YM, MY and KU collected blood samples, carried out the morphometry and observed behaviors. KM and RM carried out the semen collection and observation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal handling and sample collections were conducted by veterinary staffs in accordance with the Husbandry Guidelines (in Japanese) approved by the Ethics and Welfare Committee of Japanese Association of Zoos and Aquariums.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
(2)

References

  1. Anderson RC, Adam MS, Kitchen-Wheeler A-M, Stevens G. Extent and economic value of manta ray watching in Maldives. Tourism Mar Environ. 2011;7(1):15–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. O'Malley MP, Lee-Brooks K, Medd HB. The global economic impact of manta ray watching tourism. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e65051.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Marshall AD, Compagno LJV, Bennett MB. Redescription of the genus Manta with resurrection of Manta alfredi (Krefft, 1868) (Chondrichthyes; Myliobatoidei; Mobulidae). Zootaxa. 2301;2009:1–28.Google Scholar
  4. White WT, Corrigan S, Yang L, Henderson AC, Bazinet AL, Swofford DL, Naylor GJ. Phylogeny of the manta and devilrays (Chondrichthyes: mobulidae), with an updated taxonomic arrangement for the family. Zool J Linnean Soc. 2017; doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx018:.
  5. Marshall A, Bennett MB, Kodja G, Hinojosa-Alvarez S, Galvan-Magana F, Harding M, Stevens G, Kashiwagi T. Manta birostris. In:The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011. 2011. doi:https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-2.RLTS.T198921A9108067.en. Accessed Jan 2016.
  6. Marshall A, Kashiwagi T, Bennett MB, Deakos M, Stevens G, McGregor F, Clark T, Ishihara H, Sato K. Manta alfredi. In:The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011. 2011. doi:https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-2.RLTS.T195459A8969079.en. Accessed Jan 2016.
  7. Marshall AD, Bennett MB. Reproductive ecology of the reef manta ray Manta alfredi in southern Mozambique. J Fish Biol. 2010;77(1):169–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Couturier LI, Marshall AD, Jaine FR, Kashiwagi T, Pierce SJ, Townsend KA, Weeks SJ, Bennett MB, Richardson AJ. Biology, ecology and conservation of the Mobulidae. J Fish Biol. 2012;80(5):1075–119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Couturier LIE, Jaine FRA, Townsend KA, Weeks SJ, Richardson AJ, Bennett MB. Distribution, site affinity and regional movements of the manta ray, Manta alfredi (Krefft, 1868), along the east coast of Australia. Mar Freshw Res. 2011;62(6):628.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Matsumoto Y, Uchida S. Reproductive behaviour of manta rays (Manta birostris) in captivity. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Aquarium Congress: 2008; Shanghai, China; 2008. p. 123–37.Google Scholar
  11. Uchida S, Toda M, Matsumoto Y: Captive records of manta rays in Okinawa Churaumi Aquarium. In: Joint Meeting of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists: 23-28 July 2008; Montreal, Can Underwrit.Google Scholar
  12. Yano K, Sato F, Takahashi T. Observations of mating behavior of the manta ray, Manta birostris, at the Ogasawara Islands, Japan. Ichthyol Res. 1999;46(3):289–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Tomita T, Toda M, Ueda K, Uchida S, Nakaya K. Live-bearing manta ray: how the embryo acquires oxygen without placenta and umbilical cord. Biol Lett. 2012;8(5):721–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Nozu R, Nakamura M. Cortisol administration induces sex change from ovary to testis in the protogynous wrasse, Halichoeres trimaculatus. Sex Dev. 2015;9(2):118–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Asahina K, Kambegawa A, Higashi T. Development of a microtiter plate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for 17-alpha, 20-beta-21-trihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one, a teleost gonadal steroid. Fisheries Sci. 1995;61(3):491–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Deakos MH. Paired-laser photogrammetry as a simple and accurate system for measuring the body size of free-ranging manta rays Manta alfredi. Aquat Biol. 2010;10(1):1–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Gelsleichter J, Rasmussen LEL, Manire CA, Tyminski J, Chang B, Lombardi-Carlson L. Serum steroid concentrations and development of reproductive organs during puberty in male bonnethead sharks, Sphyrna tiburo. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2002;26(4):389–401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark E, von Schmidt K. Sharks of the central gulf coast of Florida. Bull Mar Sci. 1965;15(1):13–81.Google Scholar
  19. Deakos MH. The reproductive ecology of resident manta rays (Manta alfredi) off Maui, Hawaii, with an emphasis on body size. Environ Biol Fish. 2012;94(2):443–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement