Open Access

Understanding the dynamics of physiological impacts of environmental stressors on Australian marsupials, focus on the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus)

BMC ZoologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted20161:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-016-0004-8

Received: 8 May 2016

Accepted: 26 July 2016

Published: 23 August 2016

Abstract

Since European settlement more than 10 % of Australia’s native fauna have become extinct and the current picture reflects 46 % are at various vulnerability stages. Australia’s iconic marsupial species, koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) is listed as vulnerable under national environmental law. Human population growth, road expansion and extensive land clearance have fragmented their eucalyptus habitat and reduced the ability of koalas to move across the tree canopy; making the species most vulnerable on the ground. Disease-principally chlamydia, road death, dog-attack and loss of habitat are key environmental pressures and the reasons why koalas are admitted for veterinary care. It is important to understand the dynamics of the physiological impacts that the koala faces from anthropogenic induced environmental challenges, especially on its essential biological functions (e.g. reproduction and immune system function). This review explores published literature and clinical data to identify key environmental stressors that are operating in mainland koala habitats, and while the focus is mostly on the koala, much of the information is analogous to other wildlife; the review may provide the impetus for future investigations involving other vulnerable native wildlife species (e.g. frogs). Oxalate nephrosis associated renal failure appears to be the most prevalent disease in koala populations from South Australia. Other key environmental stressors included heat stress, car impacts and dog attacks. It is possible that maternal stress, nutritional deprivation, dehydration and possible accumulation of oxalate in eucalyptus leaf increase mostly during drought periods impacting on fetal development. We hypothesize that chronic stress, particularly in urban and fringe zones, is creating very large barriers for conservation and recovery programs. Chronic stress in koalas is a result of the synergistic interplay between proximate environmental stressor/s (e.g. heat stress and fringe effects) acting on the already compromised kidney function, immune- and reproductive suppression. Furthermore, the effects of environmental pollutants in the aggravation of diseases such as kidney failure, reproductive suppression and suppression of the unique marsupial immune system should be researched. Environmental policies should be strengthened to increase human awareness of the threats facing the koala, increased funding support towards scientific research and the protection and creation of reserve habitats in urban areas and fringe zones. Global climate change, nutritional deprivation (loss of food sources), inappropriate fire management, invasive species and the loss of genetic diversity represent the complexities of environmental challenges impacting the koala biology.

Keywords

Climate change Australia Wildlife Koala Conservation Diseases Extinction Stress physiology Reproduction Immune function Survival

Background

Human population growth and global climate change are severely impacting on Australia’s environment [14]. The negative effects of climate change are clearly demonstrated in the steady decline of native Australian wildlife [5, 6]. Australia is home to a distinctive and robust range of many endemic fauna [4], including the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). To safeguard the future of native wildlife species, it is crucial for researchers to identify the biological impacts that environmental stressors have on animals, hindering their ability to reproduce and survive. In this review, we will use the example of the koala to provide a detailed discussion on the biological impacts of key environmental stressors on wildlife in Australia.

Stress or any disturbance in an animal’s natural surrounding activates a ‘flight or fight’ response; a complex cascade of neurohormonal events [7, 8], including an acute stress response (releasing glucocorticoids-a group of corticosteroids with metabolic actions). Glucocorticoids direct energy towards a physical effort [8, 9] and it is an adaptive survival response [9, 10]. On the contrary, chronic stress (prolonged exposure to any noxious stimulus; predation for example) leads to sensitized glucocorticoid reactivity to stressors (See excellent review by [11]), which could have an inhibitory effect on reproductive hormone secretion ([8, 12]) affecting reproductive organ functionality [7], testicular histology [12, 13] and reproductive success [14]. Furthermore, a compromised immune system [7, 15] concomitantly may expose the animal to increased risk of autoimmune diseases, viral infections/resurgence [16], endotoxic shock [17] and susceptibility to parasitism/wound infections [18].

Mortality events in the koala are reflected similarly in other Australian wildlife [1922] and include predation by feral/introduced species [4, 23], loss of habitat/fragmentation/suitable trees [2430], climate change [4], car impacts [31], inappropriate fire management [20], drought/extreme temperature events [4, 32], pollutants [33, 34] and disease [30, 3539]. Chlamydia is a major contributor within the decline of the koala [38, 40] and together with the Koala retrovirus (KoRV) these are the two major endemic disease manifestations in wild and captive koalas [39, 41]. As in other species, manifestations of disease incidence are strongly associated with unpredictable environmental change [27, 28, 36, 41, 42] reflecting a common environmental stress related impact.

The primary objective of this review paper is to scrutinize both clinical data and published literature to identify key environmental stressors and their biological impacts on koala populations.

Environmental stressors

The negative effects of anthropomorphic driven environmental change (e.g. extreme heat wave events) on wildlife species are increasing [5]. There are consequences of these changes to the physical and biological systems due to environmental stressors, such as wildlife road deaths [2] or pathogen spill over [4345]. The complexity of the environmental interactions leading to these occurrences can be synergistic and multi-directional. Urbanisation and increasing population spread often have abrupt and tangible effects on the environment; divergence of water sources [46], clearance of habitats for agriculture [47] and logging of forests [35, 48]. Less tangible are the malignant effects of climate change [4951] and environmental contamination from pollution [33, 52, 53]. Greater aridity, erosion and extreme weather events driven by anthropogenic climate change [5457] decrease environmental productivity [47] and increase competition between native and exotic herbivores [6, 58]. Competition between introduced and native carnivores [59] significantly alter the predator–prey dyad [60] allowing exotic carnivorous species to gain pre-eminence and prey on native species with increased rapacity [6063]. Food availability decreases not only for native herbivores but also for any species that relies on a degraded biome [64]. Interspecies competition for nutrition [59, 64, 65] and suitable breeding niches [64] often preface failure of immune functions [15, 48] and reproductive hormone suppression [66] limiting, at every level, species’ ability to fulfil their biological imperative. Fungicides, pesticides [52], perfluorinated compounds and radionuclides [33, 53] persist in the environment [52] and bio-accumulate in the food chain [33, 53, 67]. Reprotoxic pollutants have a multi-faceted interaction with habitat degradation [52] and as a limiting factor within species’ reproductive success [6873]. Wildlife road death appears to be a simple case of cause and effect, but in reality may be the ultimate representation of multiple, synergistic, complex dynamic environmental processes. Hypothetically, the death of a koala may represent a search for food [65], or it could be related to cognitive or psychological malfunction from disease [74] or parasitism ([7577], [76, 7883]), be searching for a mate or suitable breeding opportunity [64] or simply trying to escape from an introduced predator species [8486] or controlled burn off [87]. The selection pressures affecting Australian wildlife are unprecedented [3]. When faced with these challenges species may respond by relocating to a suitable biome. This is clearly demonstrated in the pattern of movement of many native passerines tracking a suitable climatic niche, before major habitat destruction, across arid areas of Australia [8891]. A species may alternatively show phenotypic plasticity [3] in response to environmental changes and remain within their traditional biome [92] or undergo genetic change in evolutionary time-scale. Evidence of adaptive genetic change is few although Gardner et al. [93] presented strong evidence for genetically driven morphological changes. Environmental degradation and fragmentation within a rapid spatial and temporal pattern limits the species’ adaptive ability [48] at the velocity required for species longevity [3]. Isolation of populations as a result of habitat degradation, predation [94] or populations devastated during extreme weather events [95] can impact on species genetic diversity limiting their potential for evolution [94] or recovery when a stressor has subsided.

Evidence suggests that the velocity of climate change within this century is expected to be rapid [96] with a collateral need of species to adapt and redistribute at a pace commensurate with the movement of suitable climates. To calculate the velocity of climate change, global temperature has been used [96] with evidence that a wide species range will/have shift/ed poleward or uphill in response to increased global temperatures [1, 49, 97, 98]. From the late 19th century global temperatures have risen by 0.6 °C with an acceleration of increase recorded in the last 40 years [93] however, these studies have focused on temperate geographical climates [49, 98]. Walther et al. [51] commented that biotic and abiotic ecosystems are not governed by world-wide temperature averages and sub-regional variation is of greater relevance in assessment of the ecological impacts of climate change. Van Der Wal et al. [91]) analysed 60 years of climatic data showing that the dispersal of Australian wildlife often orientated towards increased temperature in response to precipitation events. The findings of Van Der Wal et al. [91] when viewed in the context of the unique Australian weather patterns seem hardly surprising. Australia historically has experienced periods of drought and high rainfall. In the years 1788–1860 south-eastern Australia experienced 27 years of drought and New South Wales, 14 years of heavy rain [99]. The variability of rainfall in Australia, among the world’s highest, demonstrates in wet and dry periods often with extreme transition periods between the two [55]. The “Big Dry” from 1997–2009 was extreme and record breaking in its length [100]. The resultant research highlighted this weather event as a combination of traditional solar variability amplified by anthropogenic global warming from increased atmospheric greenhouse gases [54, 56]. Extremes in weather, including decreased rainfall, increased maximum temperatures, flash and basin flooding will impact on wildlife with greater risk of fires, decreased ground cover and possible increased erosion and sediment loading within catchments, rivers and lakes [55].

Chronic stress: impacts on reproduction and immune system

Disruptions to the environment and activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (Fig. 1) generally prepares the body for some form of exertion ([9], [8, 101]). The hypothalamus releases corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) [7], signalling the anterior pituitary to release adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) [8], which circulates in the blood and results in an increased output of glucocorticoids from the adrenal cortices [101]. Glucocorticoids act to divert storage of glucose, as glycogen or fat, and to mobilise glucose from stored glycogen. Cortisol is the pivotal glucocorticoid within HPA-axis stimulation and then restoration of homeostasis following the physiological stress response [101, 102]. Cortisol stimulates gluconeogenesis, preparing the animal for physical challenge, by partitioning energy, it also assists in balancing pH after the challenge, and finally acts as a chemical blocker, within a negative feedback process [102], to CRH secretion and HPA axis synergy. This interplay between hormonal and metabolic responses are similar across multiple vertebrate taxa and crucial for the maintenance of homeostasis [9, 10]. The HPA axis function comes at a cost of diverting energy away from other corporal functions [3, 7, 8]. Many authors reference concomitant reduction in growth, reproduction [48] and immune function [9, 66, 102] associated with chronic stress.
Fig. 1

Activation of the koala hypothalamus-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis and the consequences on biological functions in the presence of acute and chronic stressors

Chronic stress negatively impacts reproduction. At the levels of the neuroendocrine systems, each component of the HPA axis acts as an inhibitor to the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis and once the HPA axis is activated, secretion of gonadotropin-hormone releasing hormone (GnRH) [8] and pituitary gonadotrophin responsiveness is lowered; testis and ovarian sensitivity to gonadal hormones become reduced [7]. Suppression of the reproductive function during an acute stress episode should be ephemeral whilst priorities of energy expenditure are shifted towards survival rather than reproduction [8] however, chronic stress and continued high levels of glucocorticoids prolong the inhibitory effect on reproduction and may also increase testicular apoptosis [12, 13] contributing to decreased circulating testosterone levels [12]. Aerobic mitochondrial metabolism as a consequence generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) [8, 48] and in the absence of pro-oxidant-antioxidant balance oxidative stress ensues [103]. Leydig cell apoptosis as a result of increased glucocorticoid release generates ROS, which may compromise sperm integrity and fetal development [104, 105].

We hypothesise that wild koala populations are most likely impacted by chronic stressors (diseases and anthropogenic induced environmental change) and they could also be undergoing sub-clinical changes to their reproductive system, such as suppression of gonadal functions, irregular reproductive hormone cycles and infertility in both males and females. These postulations require urgent investigation and it is recommended that general health checks of wild rescued koalas should also include physiological stress evaluation and reproductive health assessment [106, 107].

The stress endocrine response, despite many negative connotations, is a physiological function integral to survival [3, 108] and evidence suggest that vertebrates are designed to display plasticity in response to environmental challenges and evolutionary pressures to maintain allostasis ([3, 9, 15, 18]). Dhabar et al. [109] in studies using rats demonstrated that the immune system response to acute stress is adaptive. The acute stress response resulted in redistribution of immune cells; norepinephrine (NE)/epinephrine (EPI) facilitated an increase in immune cells within the blood stream and EPI/corticosterone (CORT) caused procession of immune cells from the blood stream to the skin [18], lymphoid tissue and to other sites involved in ‘de novo immune activation’ [109]. In acute stress, fleeing from a predator, interspecies aggression or the hunt for food there is a presumption that the immune response would have adapted to a biological system which is energy efficient, expediently activated and which would protect the animal from skin trauma, bites or non-specific infection, natural corollaries of an exertive effort. This system would also allow for energy to be redistributed to systems engaged in the physical effort. Moller and Saino [82] demonstrated a significant correlation between survival and strong innate immune responses in birds conferring an obvious fitness advantage over those with compromised immune system. Conversely, in the Dhabhar & McEwen [18] study delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) was lessened and skin leukocytes were attenuated under chronic stress, which correlated with decreased response to glucocorticoids. The implications of a suppressed DTH in combination with attenuated skin lymphocytes may decrease resistance to opportunistic or harmful pathogens [18]. A temporary increase in Natural Killer cells (NKC) followed by suppression in response to peripheral β-adrenergic activation has been demonstrated in rats [110113] and is part of the innate immune system, however Shakhar & Ben-Eliyahu [114] demonstrated that continuous acute levels of catecholamine were retrograde to NKC sensitive tumour line. The authors comment that a differentiation should be drawn between stress events and major sympathetic activation in which a dysfunction of NKC activity may allow metastasis to establish. Forced swimming [110] and attacked/submissive intruders [112] increased lung tumour metastasis retention/colonisation in rats whilst Vegas et al. [113] did not investigate NKC but found mice with poor social coping strategies, including low social exploration, defensiveness, low social position or avoidance developed more pulmonary metastasis. NKC are considered part of the innate immune system [115] and following challenge with tumour cell inoculation, retention and development of metastasis, are rigidly controlled for 24 h by NKC [112]. The discovery, in mice, of NK cells showing an adaptive immune response, antigen memory and specificity, in the absence of T & B cells [116] to a ‘hapten based contact sensitiser’ [115] is interesting within the chronic stress-immune system dyad. Social isolation stress, in mice challenged with bacterial endotoxin, has been shown to increase arginine vasopressin (AVP), decrease CRH mRNA (glucocorticoid receptor) and increases endotoxic shock susceptibility [17]. The biological impacts of environmental pollutants on koala populations have not been studied in great detail. Thus, it will be important to investigate the potential impacts of chemical pollutants such as atrazine and other agricultural chemicals as it has been shown that environmental pollutants have the capacity to increase infectious disease susceptibility through chronic stress and of the immune and reproductive system dysfunction (see [15]).

Diseases

Whilst loss of habitat, predation, climate change and fire have been widely studied as important environmental stressors there has been very little research into the decline of marsupial species resultant of toxic chemical exposure [117, 118]. Cluster disease events such as birth defects/thalidomide [119], employees occupationally exposed to polyvinyl chloride/liver angiosarcoma [120], typhoid outbreaks/water quality [121], childhood leukaemia associated/polluted well water [122], fluorosis in kangaroos/aluminium smelter [123, 124] and environmental/animal/human contamination due to polybrominated biphenyls in Michigan [125] indicate that some disease clusters are signals of environmental exposure [126], the consequence of which may have been preventable [127]. Bridging the gap between epidemiological studies, which identify environmental contamination as the probable cause of a disease manifestation and providing regulators with scientific certainties to enact policy often appears at juxtaposition with mitigation of the disease cluster; obvious xenobiotic exposure dismissed as insignificant [125, 127].

Several clusters of disease affect Australian wildlife; oxalate nephrosis in the South Australia koala [128, 129], chlamydia in Queensland koala [39, 130], Tasmanian devil facial tumor [131, 132], mycotic diseases in amphibians [133], mucormycosis in the Tasmanian platypus [134], two of these within a small biome, and increasing amounts of retrovirus, causing leukaemia and lymphoma [135] many not seen before 1950 indicating a commonality of environmental stressor. Rhodes et al. [136] considers that mortality from diseases must be reduced by 59 % to prevent further koala declines. Therefore, identification of environmental stressors that can lead to a decrease in the immune system function is critical to koala conservation and recovery programs.

Oxalate nephrosis

Data from 225 koalas from South Australia represented in Fig. 2 clearly demonstrates oxalate nephrosis (ON) as the predominant disease condition affecting koalas; 26.2 % of the koalas admitted to the hospital diagnosed (November 2013-December 2014) and is considered the leading disease within the Mt Lofty ranges, east of Adelaide in South Australia [128, 129]. This condition, although also present in the Queensland and New South Wales koala is considered of limited incidence and impact in those states [128]. Estimates of 11 % renal dysfunction Mt Lofty Ranges populations in 2000 [128] and 55 % in 2014 demonstrating gross or histopathological changes with oxalate crystal deposition [129] consistent with ON shows a rapid temporal progression [129, 137]. Azotaemia (higher than normal blood urea-BUN) in combination with poorly concentrated urine and low specific gravity was associated with increased severity of histopathological changes [128, 129], which may point to renal disease as the ultimate cause within a complex patho-physiological dynamics.
Fig. 2

Clinical cases of koalas (N = 225) presented for treatment at a wildlife rescue facility in South Australia from November 2013–December 2014. Many patients presented with multiple conditions reflected in the tabled number of diagnosed condition versus patient numbers. Clearly in SA the major challenge for koalas is oxalate nephrosis, heat stress, car impacts and particularly for males dog attack. Unknown and trauma cases are well represented, many indicative of injuries sustained during dog attack or car collision and had these been included a more profound effect would have been shown. C = confirmed; U = unconfirmed

It is worthwhile to note that metatherian embryos (e.g. koalas) compared to eutherian embryos (e.g. chicken) require significant development dependent upon maternal milk during pouch development. Notably, marsupial mothers dedicate greater investment in lactation than in gestation [138]. Therefore, the effect of nutritional restriction [139141] and increased maternal circulating glucocorticoids [139, 142144] on the fetus during critical windows of development can result in decreased nephron numbers [139141, 143, 144] predisposing offspring to continued nephron loss, progressive renal dysfunction/injury [139], glomerulosclerosis [145] and enhance sensitivity to secondary postnatal environmental insult [139]. Low glomerular number is an important determinant of renal function [146]. Speight et al. [128] found glomerular atrophy in all koala patients with ON accompanied by fibrosis associated with crystal obstruction of the tubules. This may point to a duality of causal factors; maternal stress and nutritional deprivation impacting foetal development in combination with and proximate environmental stressor/s acting on already compromised kidney function. Calcium phosphate, generally associated with calcium oxalate crystals, was found in both healthy and ON koalas [128] and may be only functionally important when renal function is already compromised. The prevalence of ON in young koalas [137] may preclude over consumption of oxalate as a cause implicating a pre-existing renal developmental disorder. The similar incidence of ON in captive koala populations [128] is suggestive of reasons other than a maternal gestational nutritional restriction impacting fetal kidney development pointing to stress and increased maternal glucocorticoids as the primary cause in both captive & wild populations. Alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase (AGT) is an enzyme expressed in the hepatocytes and it is crucial for the metabolism of glyoxylate, the end product oxalate, excreted in urine [147]. Isolated populations of decreased genetic diversity show an autosomal disorder demonstrated by AGT deficiency [128, 137, 147, 148] however a decrease in AGT activity was not shown in SA koalas affected by ON [137]. Mt Lofty eucalypts showed higher levels of oxalates than Queensland species but despite this dietary oxalic acid ingestion was not considered as the cause of ON [128] however the results were pooled which may not allow for koala feeding exclusivity on eucalypts with the high oxalic acid content of some eucalypt species.

Koalas show a region/species preference [24, 149] with SA koalas displaying a marked preference for E. viminalis (manna gum) [150] and although koalas prefer to browse on young leaves in the wild, they are more likely to consume mature leaves due to availability. Manna gum and messmate leaf samples in the Mt Lofty ranges showed high oxalic acid concentration (4.68, 5.22 and 7.51 % DW respectively) with mature leaves overall showing higher oxalic acid content [128] during Spring sampling. Eucalypt species during times of low rainfall make osmoric adjustments, which reduces leaf water content [151]. Drought stress has been described in the Eucalypt with messmate stringy bark most affected [152]; peach trees demonstrate decreased leaf water content and increased oxalic acid levels [153]. Sampling of the same trees during summer or on the fringe may have had demonstrated different oxalic acid levels and the suggestion would be that eucalyptus seasonal, area specific oxalic acid levels be investigated with koala preferences adjusted for.

Other causal factors for ON are ingestion of ethylene gycol [129], which appears unlikely, however the extensive use of ethylene glycol in airplane deicers, automotive industry and solvents (ethylene glycol, http://www.npi.gov.au/resource/ethylene-glycol-12-ethanediol) and the proximity of ON cases to the Adelaide airport (Fig. 3) requires further investigation. Statistics Australia wide show alimentary tract and intestinal disease represented in 40 and 35 % of the koalas respectively. The possibility exists that over absorption of oxalic acid due to intestinal disease [154], decreased oxalic acid specific anaerobic bacteria [129, 154, 155] or slow microbial adaptation [156] is a factor in the development of ON disease and also requires further investigation.
Fig. 3

Oxalate Nephrosis (ON) cases by Adelaide Airport proximity. There is clear evidence of increased ON cases in the area falling within the 10–20kms of the airport. This should be investigated for a commonality of environmental stressor

Habitual factors mediate the composition of intestinal microbiota however the absence of bacteria with anti-inflammatory action during disease may implicate the essential nature of a functional intestinal bacterial flora for health [157, 158] and further investigation on the effects of elevated glucocorticoids on koala intestinal bacteria is required. Treatment indicated for ON is increased hydration [148], considered quite problematic with low leaf moisture content for the koala. Vickneswaran et al. [144] found male rat nephron numbers were most affected during gestation by maternal stress however Speight et al. [128] found no evidence of koala gender involvement in ON. The identification that prenatal nephron deficiency can be corrected with a single dose of retinoic acid [159] during gestation, even with nutritional deprivation, and during lactation [141] shows system plasticity, which can be exploited, particularly if environmental stressors can be identified and mitigated.

Chlamydiosis

Koalas suffer from two types of chlamydiosis, Chlamydia pneumoniae [39, 130], which may be endemic within koalas and C. pecorum, responsible for substantial reproductive consequences for the species [38, 39, 160] and possibly result of cross-species transmission [28]. Evidence suggests the chlamydia is associated with nutritional/environmental stressors [27] and symptoms vary from conjunctivitis, which may lead to blindness, respiratory tract infections [130], reproductive discharge and possible infertility [38].

The identification of genes from the natural killer complex (NKC) and leukocyte receptor complex (LRC) in koalas with chlamydia is suggestive of a role in the immune system [38] and may implicate the down-regulation of NKC activity during periods of chronic stress within individual manifestations and severity of chlamydial disease [40]. Rhodes et al. [136], Melzer et al. [27], and Phillips [28] question the impact chlamydiosis has on reproductive rates or survival of the koala with the possibility that ‘stable coexistence’ [27, 28] between disease and the koala has been demonstrated in population modelling [28]. Rhodes et al. [136] cites high rate of mortality rather than reproductive suppression in coastal koala populations as the stressor limiting the growth rate of the population. Chlamydia diagnosis, in the presence of an inflamed cloaca, without diagnostic confirmation or despite negative results (Narayan unpublished data) may have over emphasised the incidence of the disease within koala populations.

Fringe effects

High cortisol levels in koalas are associated with range edge, lower rainfall and leaf moisture [161] with continuously high cortisol levels, indicating chronic stress, for example, in a fragmented spider monkey colony [162]. Within dry or high temperature environments, leaf moisture dictates eucalyptus choice [27, 163] and combined with fur insulation, low basal metabolism, decreased body temperature [164], evaporative loss from the respiratory tract [165] and the ability to utilise non-fodder trees where the daytime temperature is lower [27, 166] allow thermoregulation and arboreal existence. Ellis et al. [165] found non-fodder daytime trees favoured by koalas were 2 °C cooler than the ambient temperature and are a critical feature of the koala microclimate. During drought and heatwaves koala survival depends upon relocation to a riparian habitat [24, 161, 165, 167, 168] and the availability of free standing water [161] without which dehydration follows. Contraction of riparian habitat is associated with mass mortality events in young koalas pushed from moist sites to the fringe [167] and expectation for fragmented or fringe populations in extreme temperature events increases extinction risk [161, 168]. Heat stress cases, reflected in Fig. 4, clearly show an association between koala heat stress, suburban fringe and temperatures exceeding 40 °C, the exception being 4 heat stress cases at 28.3 °C, however the preceding day was 44.7 °C and demonstrates the potential for heat stress, possibly resultant of dehydration, despite cooler temperatures [169].
Fig. 4

Heat stress is a major environmental stressor in the koala. Anthropogenic driven global warming with an increase in extreme temperature events pose a substantial risk of mortality when koala colonies have limited access to riparian habitats. It shows the number of heat stress cases against environmental temperature; cases are strongly associated with days of high temperature. Four cases were recorded for a moderate temperature of 28.3 °C however the preceding day was 44.7 °C and illustrates the limited ability of the koala to recover from extreme temperatures despite moderation of conditions. Temperature data was obtained from the Bureau of Meteorology (http://www.bom.gov.au/)

Higher leaf moisture is associated with soil water holding capacity [161]; the assumption being that soil would be moisture deprived at the fringe of a habitat. The koala, a caecum-colon fermener [170] maintains a precarious energy balance [171, 172], utilising poor quality diets containing essential oils and tannins within an extensive, prolonged, microbial digestive process [173]. The basal metabolism of the koala is 74 % of the mean of other marsupials [173] with maintenance energy requirements similarly reflected [164, 173]. Koalas spend around 19.3 – 20 h a day resting or sleeping [172, 174] however hypervigilance has been demonstrated in response to human presence/noise [171]. The energetic cost of chronic stress impacts reproduction [12, 13], growth [7], and the immune system [7, 15] whilst hypervigilance, the relationship with proximity to suburbia (Fig. 3) creates an energy/water/thermoregulation deficit [171, 172] when unable to engage in physiological and behavioural adaptations [174]. Large/small body size, within a Bergman’s rule (smaller body size as environmental heat increases) creates a paradox for the koala within degraded, fragmented/fringe habitats with water deprived environments experiencing extreme temperature events resultant of anthropogenic climate warming [5, 24, 54, 56, 57, 175]. Small body size in Queensland koalas allows for effective heat dissipation [176] but in the absence of water may encourage dehydration [5]. Koalas are larger in temperate areas as males size under sexual selection [176, 177] and as a result need more water [172] but would consequently have an inability to dissipate heat. This is clearly reflected in heat stress cases (Figs. 3 and 4) in which males (N = 17) and females (N = 11) showed marked difference in SA koalas.

Predation and road trauma

Rhodes et al. [136] and McAlpine et al. [31] commented that as forest cover is reduced mortality events increase; koala population decline considered to be driven by increased mortality events [31]. Species within a fragmented or isolated habitat have a low probability of survival [178180]. According to Davies et al. [25, 26], koalas living in the edge of its range often increase their movement in search of food sources and increase their vulnerability to predation in doing so. Both rural and suburban fragmentation/fringe effects are high risk for dog attack/vehicle trauma [28, 31, 35] with natal dispersal of 2–3 year old males clearly represented within deaths (Fig. 5). Absence of overlapping canopy encourages koalas to cross gaps between trees on the ground increasing vulnerability to dog-attack and vehicle trauma [31]. Reduced abundance of vertebrates worldwide is associated with proximity to roads [181]; road trauma, noise [181] and pollution must be also considered within koala chronic stress dynamics.
Fig. 5

Relative risk for koalas based upon specific environment. The four main environmental stressors and the occurrence in specific biomes. The suburban fringe appears to be highest risk for three of the four stressors affecting South Australia koalas

Conclusions

Our literature review provides fresh evidence that koala populations in urban and fringe areas are being severely impacted by environmental stressors. It is the synergistic nature of environmental stressors that makes the impact much more severe and the prolonged nature of stressors, arrival of new stressors (such as new urban development projects) are causing increasingly more stress to koala populations. We have identified key areas of investigation for future research, including a stronger focus on diseases (e.g. maternal transfer of immune genes to developing embryos), impacts on reproductive fitness traits (e.g. sperm integrity and mortality) and stronger research focus under the thematic area of chronic stress. Clearly, the field of conservation physiology, through non-invasive reproductive and stress hormone monitoring technologies have an important position in koala conservation and management research programs [107, 182]. Koala recovery programs should also focus on the potential impacts of environmental pollutants on the populations, especially those living in close proximity to urban zones. Native wildlife species can provide real-life examples of how anthropogenic induced environmental changes are impacting on Australia’s once pristine terrestrial environments. Hence, we should start thinking more seriously about our actions and how we are impacting nature. Stronger support is needed for research and conservation management programs to save our native fauna from the threat of extinction.

Abbreviations

ACTH, adrenocorticotrophic hormone; AGT, alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase; AVP, arginine vasopressin; BUN, blood urea; CORT, corticosterone; CRH, corticotrophin-releasing hormone; DTH, delayed type hypersensitivity; EPI, epinephrine; GnRH, gonadotropin-hormone releasing hormone; HPA, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; HPG, hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal; KoRV, koala retrovirus; LRC, leukocyte receptor complex; NE, norepinephrine; NKC, natural killer cells; ON, oxalate nephrosis; ROS, reactive oxygen species

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We wish to wholeheartedly thank the veterinary staff, nurses and volunteers of the Adelaide Koala and Wildlife Hospital (AKWH). Special thanks to Sue Finch, Dr Phil Hutt, Dr Sheridan Lathe for their generous support.

Availability of data and materials

This is a review and all data presented has been previously published and citations have been provided. The Adelaide Koala and Wildlife Hospital has been duly acknowledged for providing clinical data that have been adequately presented in graphs. Raw data may be requested through consent of the AKWH.

Authors’ contributions

EN conceptualised the review paper and the Masters of Science Research Scholar (MW) conducted the literature collection and data collation. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was not required for review article. Dr Narayan holds Charles Sturt University Animal Care and Ethics protocol (#A10644) for collaborative koala research with the Adelaide Koala and Wildlife Hospital.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University

References

  1. Hughes L. Climate change and Australia: trends, projections and impacts. Aust Ecol. 2003;28:423–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Van der Ree R, McCarthy MA. Inferring persistence of indigenous mammals in response to urbanisation. Anim Conserv. 2005;8(03):309–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Wingfield JC. The comparative biology of environmental stress: behavioural endocrinology and variation in ability to cope with novel changing environments. Anim Behav. 2013;85(5):1127–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Woinarski JCZ, Burbidge AA, Harrison PL. Ongoing unraveling of a continental fauna: Decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417301112 - See more at: http://www.smh.com.au/national/gone-feral-the-cats-devouring-our-wildlife-20140911-10fbs1.html 2015
  5. McKechnie AE, Wolf BO. Climate change increases the likelihood of catastrophic avian mortality events during extreme heat waves. Biol Lett. 2010;6:253–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0702.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Taylor DL, Leung LP, Gordon IJ. The impact of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) on an Australian lowland tropical rainforest. Wildl Res. 2011;38(5):437–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. O’Connor TM, O’Halloran DJ, Shanahan F. The stress response and the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis: from molecule to melancholia. QJM. 2000;93(6):323–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Whirledge S, Cidlowski JA. Glucocorticoids, stress, and fertility. Minerva Endocrinol. 2010;35(2):109.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Hing S, Narayan E, Thompson RA, Godfrey S. A review of factors influencing the stress response in Australian marsupials. Conserv Physiol. 2014;2(1):cou027.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Dantzer B, Fletcher QE, Boonstra R, Sheriff MJ. Measures of physiological stress: a transparent or opaque window into the status, management and conservation of species? Conserv Physiol. 2014;2(1):cou023.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Herman JP. Neural control of chronic stress adaptation. Front Behav Nuerosci. 2013;7:1–12.Google Scholar
  12. Gao HB, Tong MH, Guo QS, Ge R, Hardy MP. Glucocorticoid induces apoptosis in rat leydig cells. Endocrinology. 2002;143(1):130–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Yazawa H, Sasagawa I, Nakada T. Apoptosis of testicular germ cells induced by exogenous glucocorticoid in rats. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(9):1917–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Narayan E, Jessop T, Hero J-M. Invasive cane toad triggers chronic physiological stress and decreased reproductive success in an island endemic. Funct Ecol. 2015;29(11):1435–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Duffus ALJ. Effects of environmental change on wildlife health. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2009;364(1534):3429–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Marshall Jr GD, Agarwal SK, Lloyd C, Cohen L, Henninger EM, Morris GJ. Cytokine dysregulation associated with exam stress in healthy medical students. Brain Behav Immun. 1998;12(4):297–307.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Quan N, Avitsur R, Stark JL, He L, Shah M, Caligiuri M, Padgett DA, Marucha PPT, Sherida J. Social stress increases the susceptibility to endotoxic shock. J Neuroimmunol. 2001;115(1):36–45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Dhabhar FS, McEwen BS. Acute stress enhances while chronic stress suppresses cell mediated immunity in vivo: a potential role for leukocyte trafficking. Brain Behav Immun. 1997;11(4):286–306.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Amery-Gale J, Vaz PK, Whiteley P, Tatarczuch L, Taggart DA, Charles JA, Wilks CR. Detection and Identification of a Gammaherpesvirus in Antechinus spp. in Australia. J Wildl Dis. 2014;50(2):334–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Arthur AD, Catling PC, Reid A. Relative influence of habitat structure, species interactions and rainfall on the post‐fire population dynamics of ground‐dwelling vertebrates. Aust Ecol. 2012;37(8):958–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Eymann J, Smythe LD, Symonds ML, Dohnt MF, Barnett LJ, Cooper DW, Herbert CA. Leptospirosis serology in the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) from urban Sydney, Australia. J Wildl Dis. 2007;43(3):492–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. McCallum H, Jones M, Hawkins C, Hamede R, Lachish S, Sinn DL, Lazenby B. Transmission dynamics of Tasmanian devil facial tumor disease may lead to disease-induced extinction. Ecology. 2009; 90(12):3379–3392Google Scholar
  23. Holderness-Roddam B, McQuillan PB. Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) as a predator and disturbance agent of wildlife in Tasmania. Aust J Environ Manag. 2014;21(4):441–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Black KH, Price GJ, Archer M, Hand SJ. Bearing up well? Understanding the past, present and future of Australia’s koalas. Gondwana Res. 2014;25(3):1186–201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Davies N, Gramotnev G, Seabrook L, Bradley A, Baxter G, Rhodes J, Lunney D, McAlpine C. Movement patterns of an arboreal marsupial at the edge of its range: a case study of the koala. Mov Ecol. 2013;1(1):8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Davies NA, Gramotnev G, McAlpine C, Seabrook L, Baxter G, Lunney D, Rhodes JR, Bradley A. Physiological stress in Koala populations near the arid edge of their distribution. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e79136.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Melzer A, Carrick F, Menkhorst P, Lunney D, John BS. Overview, critical assessment, and conservation implications of koala distribution and abundance. Conserv Biol. 2000;14(3):619–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Phillips SS. Population trends and the koala conservation debate. Conserv Biol. 2000;14(3):650–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Tsangaras K, Ávila-Arcos MC, Ishida Y, Helgen KM, Roca AL, Greenwood AD. Historically low mitochondrial DNA diversity in koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). BMC Genet. 2012;13(1):92.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Vaz P, Whiteley PL, Wilks CR, Duignan PJ, Ficorilli N, Gilkerson JR, Devlin JM. Detection of a novel gammaherpesvirus in koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). J Wildl Dis. 2011;47(3):787–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. McAlpine CA, Rhodes JR, Callaghan JG, Bowen ME, Lunney D, Mitchell DL, Pullar DV, Possingham HP. The importance of forest area and configuration relative to local habitat factors for conserving mammals: a case study of koalas in Queensland, Australia. Biol Conserv. 2006;132(2):153–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Davies N, Gramotnev G, Seabrook L, McAlpine C, Baxter G, Lunney D, Bradley A. Climate-driven changes in diet composition and physiological stress in an arboreal folivore at the semi-arid edge of its distribution. Biol Conserv. 2014;172:80–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Johansen MP, Twining JR. Radionuclide concentration ratios in Australian terrestrial wildlife and livestock: data compilation and analysis. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2010;49(4):603–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu C, Deng J, Yu L, Zhou B. Endocrine disruption and reproductive impairment in Zebrafish by exposure to 8:2 fluorotelomer alcohol. Aquat Toxicol. 2010;96(1):70–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Brearley G, Rhodes J, Bradley A, Baxter G, Seabrook L, Lunney D, Liu Y, McAlpine C. Wildlife disease prevalence in human-modified landscapes. Biol Rev. 2013;88(2):427–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Buddle BM, Young LJ. Immunobiology of mycobacterial infections in marsupials. Dev Comp Immunol. 2000;24(5):517–29.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Fyfe JA, Lavender CJ, Handasyde KA, Legione AR, O’Brien CR, Stinear TP, McCowan C. A major role for mammals in the ecology of Mycobacterium ulcerans. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(8):e791.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Morris KM, Mathew M, Waugh C, Ujvari B, Timms P, Polkinghorne A, Belov K. Identification, characterisation and expression analysis of natural killer receptor genes in Chlamydia pecorum infected koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Polkinghorne A, Hanger J, Timms P. Recent advances in understanding the biology, epidemiology and control of chlamydial infections in koalas. Vet Microbiol. 2013;165(3):214–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Mathew M, Beagley KW, Timms P, Polkinghorne A. Preliminary characterisation of tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-10 responses to Chlamydia pecorum infection in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Plos One. 2013;8(3):e59958.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Denner J, Young PR. Koala retroviruses: characterization and impact on the life of koalas. Retrovirology. 2013;10(1):108.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Houlden BA, England PR, Taylor AC, Greville WD, Sherwin WB. Low genetic variability of the koala Phascolarctos cinereus in south‐eastern Australia following a severe population bottleneck. Mol Ecol. 1996;5(2):269–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD. Anthropogenic environmental change and the emergence of infectious diseases in wildlife. Acta Trop. 2001;78(2):103–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoque A. Risk of spill-over of diseases (in particular avian influenza) from wild aquatic birds in North Queensland. 2011. PhD thesis, James Cook University.Google Scholar
  45. Plowright RK, Eby P, Hudson PJ, Smith IL, Westcott,D, Bryden WL, Tabor GM. Ecological dynamics of emerging bat virus spillover. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015; 282(1798):20142124.Google Scholar
  46. Gober P. Desert urbanization and the challenges of water sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2010;2:144–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Burbridge AA, McKenzie NL. Patterns in the modern decline of Western Australia’s vertebrate fauna. Biol Conserv. 1989;50(1):143–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Beaulieu M, Costantini D. Biomarkers of oxidative status: missing tools in conservation physiology. Conserv Physiol. 2014;2(1):1–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Hickling R, Roy DB, Hill JK, Fox R, Thomas CD. The distribution of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Glob Chang Biol. 2006;12(3):450–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosenzweig C, Karoly D, Vicarelli M, Neofotis P, Wu Q, Casassa G, Menzel A, Root TL, Estrella N, Seguin B, Tryjanowski P, Liu C, Rawlins S, Imeson A. Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature. 2008;453(7193):353–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Walther G-R, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, Fromentin J-M, Hoegh-Goldberg O, Bairlein F. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature. 2002;416(6879):389–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Plant R, Walker J, Rayburg S, Gothe J, Leung T. The wild life of pesticides: urban agriculture, institutional responsibility, and the future of biodiversity in Sydney’s Hawksbury Nepean River. Aust Geogr. 2012;43(1):75–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Wood MD, Beresford NA, Semenov DV, Yankovich TL, Copplestone D. Radionuclide transfer to reptiles. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2010;49(4):509–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Karoly DJ, Braganza K. Attribution of recent temperature changes in the Australian region. Am Meteorol Soc. 2005;18(3):457–61. 463–464.Google Scholar
  55. Pittock B, Abbs D, Suppiah R, Jones R. Climatic background to past and future floods in Australia. Adv Ecol Res. 2006;39:13–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Timbal B, Arblaster J, Braganza K, Fernandez E, Hendon H, Murphy B, Raupach M, Smith I, Whan K, Wheeler M. Understanding the anthropogenic nature of the observed rainfall decline across south-east Australia. The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research (CAWR). 2010. Technical report No, 026, 202 pp. Downloaded from: http://www.cawcr.gov.au/technical-reports/CTR_026.pdf on 10-2-2016.
  57. Welbergen JA, Klose SM, Markus N, Eby P. Climate change and the effects of temperature extremes on Australian flying-foxes. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2008;275(1633):419425.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Facelli JM, Temby AM. Multiple effects of shrubs on annual plant communities in arid lands of South Australia. Aust Ecol. 2002;27(4):422–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Glen AS, Dickman CR. Niche overlap between marsupial and eutherian carnivores: does competition threaten the endangered spotted‐tailed quoll? J Appl Ecol. 2008;45(2):700–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Johnson CN, Isaac JL, Fisher DO. Rarity of a top predator triggers continent-wide collapse of mammal prey: dingoes and marsupials in Australia. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;274(1608):341–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Fancourt BA, Hawkins CE, Cameron EZ, Jones ME, Nicol SC. Devil declines and catastrophic cascades: is mesopredator release of feral cats inhibiting recovery of the eastern quoll? PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0119303.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Glen AS, Pennay M, Dickman CR, Wintle BA, Firestone KB. Diets of sympatric native and introduced carnivores in the Barrington Tops, eastern Australia. Aust Ecol. 2011;36(3):290–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Kennedy M, Phillips BL, Legge S, Murphy SA, Faulkner RA. Do dingoes suppress the activity of feral cats in northern Australia? Aust Ecol. 2015;63(4):258–69.Google Scholar
  64. Haythorpe K. Competitive behaviour in Common Mynas. An investigation into potential impacts on native fauna and solutions for management. 2014. PhD thesis, Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  65. Kaňuščák P, Hromada M, Tryjanowski P, Sparks T. Does climate at different scales influence the phenology and phenotype of the River Warbler Locustella fluviatilis? Oecologia. 2004;141(1):158–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Narayan EJ. Evaluation of physiological stress in Australian wildlife: embracing pioneering and current knowledge as a guide to future research directions. General and Comparative Endocrinology. in-press. Accepted 10/12/15.Google Scholar
  67. Stahl T, Mattern D, Brunn H. Toxicology of perfluorinated compounds. Environ Sci Eur. 2011;23(1):1–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Adam-Guillerman C, Pereira S, Delia-Vedova C, Hinton T, Garnier-Laplace J. Genotoxic and reprotoxic effects of tritium and external gamma irradiation on aquatic animals. In: Whitacre DM, editor. Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. 2012. p. 67–101. 220. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Ankley GT, Bencic DC, Breen MS, Collette TW, Conolly RB, Denslow ND, Edwards SW, Ekman DR, Garcia-Reyero N, Jensen KM, Lazorchak JM, Martinovic D, Miller DH, Perkins EJ, Orlando EF, Villeneuve DL, Wang R-L, Watanabe KH. Endocrine disrupting chemicals in fish: developing exposure indicators. Aquat Toxicol. 2009;92(3):168–78.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Bony S, Gaillard I, Devaux A. Genotoxicity assessment of two vineyard pesticides in zebrafish. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 2010;90(3–6):421–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Buckley J, Willingham E, Agras K, Baskin LS. Embryonic exposure to the fungicide vinclozolin causes virilation of females and alteration of progesterone receptor expression in vivo: an experimental study in mice. Environ Health. 2006;5(4):1–6.Google Scholar
  72. Gagnaire B, Adam-Guillermin C, Bouron A, Lestaevel P. The effects of radionuclides on animal behaviour. In: Whitacre DM, editor. Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. 2011. p. 35–58. 210. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.Google Scholar
  73. Goetz AK, Dix DJ. Mode of action for reproductive and hepatic toxicity inferred from genomic study of Triazole antifungals. Toxicol Sci. 2009;110(2):449–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Alford RA, Bradfield KS, Richards SJ. Ecology: global warming and amphibian losses. Nature. 2007;447(7144):E3–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Ryan U, Power M. Cryptosporidium species in Australian wildlife and domestic animals. Parasitology. 2012;139(13):1673–88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Thompson RCA, Lymbery AJ, Smith A. Parasites, emerging disease and wildlife conservation. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40(10):1163–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Vermeulen ET, Ashworth DL, Eldridge MDB, Power ML. Investigation into potential transmission sources of Giardia duodenalis in a threatened marsupial (Petrogale penicillata). Infect Genet Evol. 2015;33:277–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Appelbee AJ, Thompson RCA, Olson ME. Giardia and Cryptosporidium in mammalian wildlife-current status and future needs. Trends Parasitol. 2005;21(8):370–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Gelis S, Spratt DM, Raidal SR. Neuroangiostrongyliasis and other parasites in tawny frogmouths (Podargus strigoides) in south‐eastern Queensland. Aust Vet J. 2011;89(1–2):47–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Jenkins DJ. Hydatid control in Australia: where it began, what we have achieved and where to from here. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35(7):733–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Lidetu D, Hutchinson GW. The prevalence, organ distribution and fertility of cystic echinoccosis in feral pigs in tropical North Queensland, Australia. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2007;74(1):73–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Moller AP, Saino N. Immune response and survival. OIKOS. 2004;104(2):299–304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Thompson J, Yang R, Power M, Hufschmid J, Beveridge I, Reid S, Ng J, Armson A, Ryan U. Identification of zoonotic Giardia genotypes in marsupials in Australia. Exp Parasitol. 2008;120(1):88–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Berry O, Kirkwood R. Measuring recruitment in an invasive species to determine eradication potential. J Wildl Manag. 2010;74(8):1661–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Courchamp F, Chapuis JL, Pascal M. Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact. Biol Rev. 2003;78(03):347–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Medina FM, Bonnaud E, Vidal E, Nogales M. Underlying impacts of invasive cats on islands: not only a question of predation. Biodivers Conserv. 2014;23(2):327–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Vine S, Dutson G. (2006–2009). IBAs in Danger: The state of Australia’s important bird and biodiversity areas. Birdlife. Accessed from: http://birdlife.org.au/documents/IBA-IBAs-in-danger-Nov14.PDF on 17-2-2016 at 12.00PM
  88. Harrington G, Freeman A, Murphy S, Venables B, Edwards C. Carpentarian Grasswren survey. Prepared for the Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management by Birds Australia North Queensland. Downloaded from: http://birdlifenq.org/pdfs/boodjamulla_2011_final_report.pdf on 16–2 at 1:19PM. 2011
  89. Norman JA, Christidis L. Ecological opportunity and the evolution of habitat preferences in the arid-zone bird: implications for speciation in a climate-modified landscape. Sci Rep. 2016;6(19613):1–12.Google Scholar
  90. Serventy VN, Pringle JD, Lindsey TR. The wrens and warblers of Australia. Sydney: Angus& Robertson; 1982.Google Scholar
  91. Van Der Wal J, Murphy HT, Kutt AS, Pperkins GC, Bateman BL, Perry JJ, Reside AE. Focus on poleward shifts in species’ distribution underestimates the fingerprint of climate change. Nat Clim Chang. 2013;3(3):239–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Gienapp P, Teplitsky C, Alho JS, Mills JA, Merilä J. Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses. Mol Ecol. 2008;17(1):167–78.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Gardner JL, Heinsohn R, Joseph L. Shifting latitudinal clines in avian body size correlate with global warming in Australian passerines. Proc R Soc B. 2009;276(1674):3845–38452.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Gasc A, Duryea MC, Cox RM, Kern A, Calsbeek R. Invasive predators deplete genetic diversity of island lizards. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(8):e12061.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Boersma PD, Rebstock GA. Climate change increases reproductive failure in Magellanic penguins. Plos one. 2014;9(1):e85602.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Loarie SR, Duffy PB, Hamilton H, Asner GP, Field CB, Ackerly DD. The velocity of climate change. Nature. 2009;462(7276):1052–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Chen I-C, Hill JK, Ohlemiller R, Roy DB, Thomas CD. Rapid change shifts species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science. 2011;333(6045):1024–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Parmesan C, Yohe G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature. 2003;421(6918):37–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Fenby C, Gergis J. Rainfall variations in south-eastern Australia part 1: consolidating evidence from pre-instrumental documentary sources, 1788–186. 2012.Google Scholar
  100. Gergis J, Ashcroft L. Rainfall variations in south-eastern Australia part 2: a comparison of documentary, early instrumental and palaeoclimate records, 1788–2008. 2012.Google Scholar
  101. Möstl E, Palme R. Hormones as indicators of stress. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2002;23(1):67–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Romero LM. Physiological stress in ecology: lessons from biomedical research. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004;19(5):249–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Sies H. Oxidative stress: from basic research to clinical application. Am J Med. 1991;30(61,3C):31S–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Aitken RJ, Smith TB, Jobling MS, Baker MA, De Iuliis GN. Oxidative stress and male reproductive health. Asian J Androl. 2014;16(1):31–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Marchetti F, Bishop JB, Cosentino L, Moore II D, Wyrobek AJ. Paternally transmitted chromosomal aberrations in mouse zygotes determine their embryonic fate. Biol Reprod. 2004;70(3):616–24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Ballantyne K, Lisle A, Mucci A, Johnston SD. Seasonal oestrous cycle activity of captive female koalas in south-east Queensland. Aust Mammal. 2015;37:245–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Narayan E, Webster K, Nicolson V, Hero J-M. Non-invasive evaluation of physiological stress in an iconic Australian marsupial: the Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2013;187:39–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Segerstrom SC, Miller GE. Psychological stress and the immune system: a meta-analysis study of 30 years on inquiry. Psychol Bull. 2004;130(4):601–30.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Dhabar FS, Malarkey WB, Neri E, McEwen BS. Stress-induced redistribution of immune cells-from barracks to boulevards to battlefields: a tale of three hormones-Curt Richter award winner. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37(9):1345–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Ben-Eliyahu S, Shakhar G, Page GG, Stefanski V, Shakhar K. Suppression of NK cell activity and of resistance to metastasis by stress: a role for adrenal catecholamines and beta-adrenoceptors. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2000;8(5):154–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Ben-Eliyahu S, Shakhar G, Page GG, Stefanski V, Shakhar K. Suppression of NK Cell Activity and of Resistance to Metastasis by Stress: A role for Adrenal Catecholamines and β-Adrenoceptors. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2000;8:154–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000054276.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Stefanski V, Ben-Eliyahu S. Social confrontation and tumor metastasis in rats: defeat and β-Adrenergic mechanisms. Physiol Behav. 1996;60(1):277–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Vegas O, Fano E, Brain PF, Alonso A, Azpiroz A. Social stress, coping strategies and tumour development in male mice: behavioural, neuroendocrine and immunological implications. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006;31(1):69–79.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Shakhar G, Ben-Eliyahu S. In vivo β-adrenergic stimulation suppresses natural killer activity and compromises resistance to tumor metastasis in rats. J Immunol. 1998;160(7):3251–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Paust S, Senman B, Von Andrian UH. Adaptive immune responses mediated by natural killer cells. Immunol Rev. 2010;235(1):286–96.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. O’Leary JG, Goodarzi M, Drayton DI, von Adrian UH. T cell- and B cell-independent adaptive immunity mediated by natural cell killer cells. Nat Immunol. 2006;7(5):507–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Bolton RM, Ahokas JT. REVIEW: detoxication in Australian marsupials-ecotoxicological implications. Australas J Ecotoxicol. 1995;1:85–98.Google Scholar
  118. Stupans I, Kong S, Kirlich A, Murray M, Bailey EL, Jones BR, McKinnon RA. Hepatic microsomal enzyme activity in the koala and tammar wallaby: high 17β-hydroxysteroid oxidoreductase activity in koala liver microsomes. Comp Biochem Physiol C: Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol. 1999;123(1):67–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Vargesson N. Thalidomide‐induced limb defects: resolving a 50‐year‐old puzzle. Bioessays. 2009;31(12):1327–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Creech Jr JL, Johnson MN. Angiosarcoma of liver in the manufacture of polyvinyl chloride. J Occup Environ Med. 1974;16(3):150–2.Google Scholar
  121. Ram PK, Naheed A, Brooks WA, Hossain MA, Mintz ED, Breiman RF, Luby SP. Risk factors for typhoid fever in a slum in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Epidemiol Infect. 2007;135(3):458–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Lagakos SW, Wessen BJ, Zelen M. An analysis of contaminated well water and health effects in Woburn, Massachusetts. J Am Stat Assoc. 1986;81(395):583–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Clarke E, Beveridge I, Slocombe R, Coulson G. Fluorosis as a probable cause of chronic lameness in free ranging eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus). J Zoo Wildl Med. 2006;37(4):477–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Kierdorf U, Death C, Hufschmid J, Witzel C, Kierdorf H. Developmental and post-eruptive defects in molar enamel of free-ranging eastern grey kangaroos (macropus giganteus) exposed to high environmental levels of fluoride. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0147427.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Reich MR. Environmental politics and science: the case of PBB contamination in Michigan. Am J Public Health. 1983;73(3):302–13.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Aamodt G, Samuelsen SO, Skrondal A. A simulation study of three methods for detecting disease clusters. Int J Health Geogr. 2006;5(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Clapp R, Howe G, LeFevre M. Environmental and occupational causes of cancer: review of recent scientific literature. The Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, University of Massachusetts Lowell. 2005.Google Scholar
  128. Speight KN, Breed WG, Boardman W, Taggart DA, Leigh C, Rich B, Haynes JI. Leaf oxalate content of Eucalyptus spp. and its implications for koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) with oxalate nephrosis. Aust J Zool. 2013;61(5):366–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Speight KN, Haynes JI, Boardman W, Breed WG, Taggart DA, Rich B, Woolford L. Plasma biochemistry and urinalysis variables of koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) with and without oxalate nephrosis. Vet Clin Pathol. 2014;43(2):244–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Marsh J, Kollipara A, Timms P, Polkinghorne A. Novel molecular markers of Chlamydia pecorum genetic diversity in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). BMC Microbiol. 2011;11(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Cheng Y, Fox S, Pemberton D, Hogg C, Papenfuss AT, Belov K. The Tasmanian devil microbiome—implications for conservation and management. Microbiome. 2015;3(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Ross T. Persistent chemicals in Tasmanian devils, Independent scientist report commissioned by the Save The Tasmanian Devil Program, Tasmania. 2008.Google Scholar
  133. Densmore CL, Green DE. Diseases of amphibians. Ilar J. 2007;48(3):235–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Grant TR, Temple-Smith PD. Conservation of the platypus, Ornithorhynchus anatinus: threats and challenges. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag. 2003;6(1):5–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Simmons G, Clarke D, McKee J, Young P, Meers J. Discovery of a novel retrovirus sequence in an Australian native rodent (Melomys burtoni): a putative link between gibbon ape leukemia virus and koala retrovirus. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9):e106954.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Rhodes JR, Ng CF, de Villiers DL, Preece HJ, McAlpine CA, Possingham HP. Using integrated population modelling to quantify the implications of multiple threatening processes for a rapidly declining population. Biol Conserv. 2011;144(3):1081–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Speight KN. Oxalate nephrosis in a population of South Australian koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). 2013.Google Scholar
  138. Jones CB, 2012 Robustness, Plasticity, and Evolvability in Mammals. Mammals: From Humble Vertebrate Beginnings to Global Terrestrial Dominance. Part of the series SpringerBriefs in Evolutionary Biology. p 7–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3885-4_2.
  139. Paixão AD, Alexander BT. How the kidney is impacted by the perinatal maternal environment to develop hypertension. Biol Reprod. 2013;89(6):144.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Symonds ME, Stephenson T, Gardner DS, Budge H. Long-term effects of nutritional programming of the embryo and fetus: mechanisms and critical windows. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2007;19:53–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Wlodek ME, Mibus A, Tan A, Siebel AL, Owens JA, Moritz KM. Normal lactational environment restores nephron endowment and prevents hypertension after placental restriction in the rat. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(6):1688–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Dickinson H, Walker DW, Wintour EM, Moritz K. Maternal dexamethasone treatment at midgestation reduces nephron number and alters renal gene expression in the fetal spiny mouse. Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys. 2007;292(1):R453–61.Google Scholar
  143. O’Sullivan L, Cuffe JS, Paravicini TM, Campbell S, Dickinson H, Singh RR, Moritz KM. Prenatal exposure to dexamethasone in the mouse alters cardiac growth patterns and increases pulse pressure in aged male offspring. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(7): e69149.Google Scholar
  144. Vickneswaran C, Jefferies AJ, Anevska K, Cheong JN, Hanvey A, Singh RR, Wlodek ME. Maternal stress during pregnancy programs nephron deficits and gender specific hypertension in second generation offspring. In: Hypertension (Vol. 63, No. 6). 2014. p. E141. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  145. Luyckx VA, Shukha K, Brenner BM. Low nephron number and its clinical consequences. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2011;2(4):e0061. doi:https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10061.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  146. Hoy WE, Bertram JF, Denton RD, Zimanyi M, Samuel T, Hughson MD. Nephron number, glomerular volume, renal disease and hypertension. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2008;17(3):258–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Pey AL, Albert A, Salido E. Protein homeostasis defects of alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase: new therapeutic strategies in primary hyperoxaluria type I. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013(687658):15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/687658.Google Scholar
  148. Cochat P, Liutkus A, Fargue S, Basmaison O, Ranchin B, Rolland MO. Primary hyperoxaluria type 1: still challenging! Pediatr Nephrol. 2006;21(8):1075–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. Phillips S, Callaghan J, Thompson V. The tree species preferences of koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) inhabiting forest and woodland communities on Quaternary deposits in the Port Stephens area, New South Wales. Wildl Res. 2000;27(1):1–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  150. Ullrey DE, Robinson PT, Whetter PA. Composition of Preferred and Rejected Eucalyptus Browse Offered to Captive Koalas, Phascolarctos Cinereus (Marsupialia). Aust J Zool. 1981;29(6):839–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Merchant A, Callister A, Arndt S, Tausz M, Adams M. Contrasting physiological responses of six Eucalyptus species to water deficit. Ann Bot. 2007;100(7):1507–15.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  152. Sinclair R. Water potential and stomatal conductance of three Eucalyptus species in the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia: responses to summer drought. Aust J Bot. 1980;28(6):499–510.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. Arndt SK, Wanek W, Clifford SC, Popp M. Contrasting adaptations to drought stress in field-grown Ziziphus mauritiana and Prunus persica trees: water relations, osmotic adjustment and carbon isotope composition. Funct Plant Biol. 2000;27(11):985–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. Allison MJ, Cook HM, Milne DB, Gallagher S, Clayman RV. Oxalate degradation by gastrointestinal bacteria from humans. J Nutr. 1986;116(3):455–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Abratt VR, Reid SJ. Oxalate-degrading bacteria of the human gut as probiotics in the management of kidney stone disease. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2010;72:63–87.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  156. Allison MJ, Littledike ET, James LF. Changes in ruminal oxalate degradation rates associated with adaptation to oxalate ingestion. J Anim Sci. 1977;45(5):1173–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  157. Penders J, Thijs C, van den Brandt PA, Kummeling I, Snijders B, Stelma F, Stobberingh EE. Gut microbiota composition and development of atopic manifestations in infancy: the Koala Birth Cohort Study. Gut. 2007;56(5):661–7Google Scholar
  158. Round JL, Mazmanian SK. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(5):313–23.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  159. Makrakis J, Zimanyi MA, Black MJ. Retinoic acid enhances nephron endowment in rats exposed to maternal protein restriction. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007;22(11):1861–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  160. Mathew M, Pavasovic A, Prentis PJ, Beagley KW, Timms P, Polkinghorne A. Molecular characterisation and expression analysis of Interferon gamma in response to natural Chlamydia infection in the koala, Phascolarctos cinereus. Gene. 2013;527(2):570–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  161. Davies N, Gillett A, McAlpine C, Seabrook L, Baxter G, Lunney D, Bradley A. The effect of ACTH upon faecal glucocorticoid excretion in the koala. J Endocrinol. 2013;219(1):1–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  162. Rangel‐Negrín A, Alfaro JL, Valdez RA, Romano MC, Serio‐Silva JC. Stress in Yucatan spider monkeys: effects of environmental conditions on fecal cortisol levels in wild and captive populations. Anim Conserv. 2009;12(5):496–502.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  163. Munks SA, Corkrey R, Foley WJ. Characteristics of arboreal marsupial habitat in the semi-arid woodlands of Northern Queensland. Wildl Res. 1996;23(2):185–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  164. Degabriele R, Dawson TJ. Metabolism and heat balance in an arboreal marsupial, the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). J Compa Physiol B: Biochem Syst Environ Physiol. 1979;134(4):293–301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  165. Ellis W, Melzer A, Clifton I, Carrick F. Climate change and the koala Phascolarctos cinereus: water and energy. Aust Zool. 2010;35(2):369–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  166. de Oliveira SM, Murray PJ, de Villiers DL, Baxter GS. Ecology and movement of urban koalas adjacent to linear infrastructure in coastal south-east Queensland. Aust Mammal. 2014;36(1):45–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  167. Gordon G, Brown AS, Pulsford T. A koala (Phascolarctos cinereus Goldfuss) population crash during drought and heatwave conditions in south‐western Queensland. Aust J Ecol. 1988;13(4):451–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  168. Seabrook L, McAlpine C, Baxter G, Rhodes J, Bradley A, Lunney D. Drought-driven change in wildlife distribution and numbers: a case study of koalas in south west Queensland. Wildl Res. 2011;38(6):509–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  169. Adelaide temperatures. The Bureau of Meteorology. Accessed from: http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/cdio/weatherData/av?p_nccObsCode=122&p_display_type=dailyDataFile&p_startYear=2015&p_c=−106708561&p_stn_num=023090 on the 15-3-2016 at 10: 50AM.
  170. Cork SJ, Hume ID. Microbial digestion in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus, Marsupialia), an arboreal folivore. J Comp Physiol. 1983;152(1):131–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  171. Larsen MJ, Sherwen SL, Rault JL. Number of nearby visitors and noise level affect vigilance in captive koalas. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2014;154:76–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  172. Nagy KA, Martin RW. Field metabolic rate, water flux, food consumption and time budget of koalas, phascolarctos cinereus (marsupialia: phascolarctidae) in Victoria. Aust J Zool. 1985;33(5):655–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  173. Cork SJ, Hume ID, Dawson TJ. Digestion and metabolism of a natural foliar diet (Eucalyptus punctata) by an arboreal marsupial, the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). J Comp Physiol. 1983;153(2):181–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  174. Benesch AR, Munro U, Krop T, Fleissner G. Seasonal changes in the behaviour and circadian rhythms in activity and behaviour of captive koalas Phascolarctos cinereus. Biol Rhythm Res. 2010;41(4):289–304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  175. McKechnie AE, Hockey PA, Wolf BO. Feeling the heat: Australian landbirds and climate change. Emu-Austral Ornithol. 2012;112(2):i.Google Scholar
  176. Briscoe NJ, Krockenberger A, Handasyde KA, Kearney MR. Bergmann meets Scholander: geographical variation in body size and insulation in the koala is related to climate. J Biogeogr. 2015;42(4):791–802.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  177. Charlton BD, Ellis WAH, Brumm J, Nilsson K, Tecumseh Fitch W. Female koalas prefer bellows in which lower formants indicate larger males. Anim Behav. 2012;84(6):1565–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  178. Lindenmayer DB, Lacy RC. Small mammals, habitat patches and PVA models: a field test of model predictive ability. Biol Conserv. 2002;103(3):247–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  179. Santos-Filho M, Peres CA, Da Silva DJ, Sanaiotti TM. Habitat patch and matrix effects on small-mammal persistence in Amazonian forest fragments. Biodivers Conserv. 2012;21(4):1127–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  180. Yates MD, Loeb SC, David Jr C. The effect of habitat patch size on small mammal populations. 1997.Google Scholar
  181. van der Ree R, Jaeger JAG, van der Grift EA, Clevenger AP. Effects of roads and traffic on wildlife populations and landscape function: road ecology is moving towards larger scales. Ecology and Society. 2011;16(1):48. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art48/.Google Scholar
  182. Narayan E. Non-invasive reproductive and stress endocrinology in amphibian conservation physiology. Conservation Physiology. 2013;1:1–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement