Skip to main content

Table 8 Comparative morphology of selected freshwater Frontonia species

From: The neotypification of Frontonia vernalis (Ehrenberg, 1833) Ehrenberg, 1838 and the description of Frontonia paravernalis sp. nov. trigger a critical revision of frontoniid systematics

Characters F. leucas sensu Foissner F. leucas
Italy, Neotype
F. leucas India F. leucas Turkey F. paramagna China F. paramagna India F. angusta Neotype F. angusta Turkey
Average body length (μm) 250 180 173 335 341 293 116 170
Cytostome/body length ratio 1/5–1/8 1/7 1/6 1/8–1/9 1/10 1/10 1/5 1/4
Somatic kineties, number 115 104 100 187 180–200 166–208 94 105
Peniculi (I, II, III), number 4–5, 4–5, 4–5 5, 5, 5 5, 5, 5 4–5, 4–5, 4–5 4, 4, 4 4, 4, 4 5–4, 3, 2 4–5, 4–5, 4–5
Vestibular kineties, number 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3
Postoral kineties, number 6 5–6 6 6–8 6–7 6–7 4 4–6
Micronuclei, number 2–9 2–3 2–4 1 8a 6–14 1 1
Micronuclei, size (μm) ND 3–5 1.5–2 7–8a ND 1.5–2.3 7a 5–8
CVC, number ~ 10 8–11 7–8 10–12 ~ 15 10–14 Absent Absent
CVC, structure Long, twisted Long, twisted Long, twisted Branched Long, straight Long, straight Absent Absent
PCV, number 1 1 1 1 1 1–3 2–4 1
References [3, 4] Present study Present study [25] [15, 46] Present study [7] [25]
  1. CV Contractile vacuole, CVC Canals of contractile vacuole, ND No Data, PCV Pores of contractile vacuole
  2. aAccording to figures
\