Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Summary of standardised predictors and their relative importance after conditional averaging of top models (all models within 2AICC) (see methods for details on predictors in each global model)

From: The effects of group versus intensive housing on the retention of genetic diversity in insurance populations

Response variable Predictor variablesa Coefficient SEb CI 95% U CI 95% L RIc
Male reproductive skew Group housing −0.65 0.39 0.11 −1.41 0.61
Age −0.47 0.35 0.22 −1.16 0.46
Female reproductive skew Age −2.47 0.90 −0.71 −4.23 1.00
Group housing −0.53 0.61 0.67 −1.73 0.27
Body weight −0.22 0.54 0.84 −1.28 0.20
Female litter size Age −0.12 0.05 −0.02 −0.22 0.29
Male reproductive successd Standardised weight 1.76 0.61 2.96 0.56 1.00
Age −0.46 0.53 0.58 −1.50 0.32
  1. All bold trials indicate enclosures that significantly deviated from equal siring success
  2. aStandardised predictors to a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 0.5; all bold predictor variables have confidence intervals that do not include zero
  3. bSE; standard error
  4. cRI; relative importance
  5. dModel uses data from group housing and does not include data from intensive housing